170 likes | 269 Views
Life Span Perspectives on Families of Persons with Cognitive Disabilities. Marty Wyngaarden Krauss Heller School Brandeis University and Marsha Mailick Seltzer Waisman Center University of Wisconsin-Madison. “Exploring Research Frontiers and Partnerships in Cognitive Disability”
E N D
Life Span Perspectives on Families of Persons with Cognitive Disabilities Marty Wyngaarden Krauss Heller School Brandeis University and Marsha Mailick Seltzer Waisman Center University of Wisconsin-Madison “Exploring Research Frontiers and Partnerships in Cognitive Disability” The Coleman Institute for Cognitive Disabilities Aspen, Colorado October 15, 2001
Issues Addressed: • Prevalence of family-based care among persons with developmental disabilities • New knowledge about family-based care • Findings from a decade of research on older families • Challenges for the future
Prevalence of Family-Based Care • Roughly 60% of persons with developmental disabilities reside with their families • Family-based care serves five times the number of people in other types of residential care • Among adults with DD living with family, 25% are aged 60 or over, 35% are between 41-59 years of age, and 40% are 41 years or younger • Over 83,000 individuals now on waiting lists for residential services • Only 3% of approximately $22.8 billion spent on DD services is targeted toward family support services
New Knowledge About Family-Based Care • Increased life expectancy for persons with DD extends duration of family-based care • Family based care is preferred option • Need for a life span developmental perspective regarding family-based care • Unanticipated lives: Gratifications and challenges of family-based care
Questions Addressed in our Research • How well do older families adapt to the challenges of lifelong caregiving? • What factors explain parental well-being in later life?
Study Design • Sample Criteria • mothers age 55 and over • son or daughter with mental retardation lives at home • Sources of Data • mothers • fathers • siblings • Frequency of Data Collection • 8 waves of data collection (1988 - 2000) • every 18 months
Sample Characteristics in 1988 (Time 1) • Average age of mothers: 66 years • 2/3 married • 1/4 employed outside the home • Average age of adults with mental retardation: 33 years • 54% sons; 46% daughters • 80% mild or moderate retardation • 1/3 Down syndrome • 90% in a day program
The Well-Being of Mothers • No greater parenting stress than mothers of young children • No greater burden of care than caregivers of elderly relatives • Comparable levels of life satisfaction as other women their age and no greater level of depression • Comparable size of social support network as other women their age
Question #2 • What factors explain parental well-being in later life?
Mothers’ Subjective Perceptions of How They Have Coped • They have altered what they value in life. • Their child has given them a mission to work for. • The relationship with their son or daughter is reciprocal.
Stress and Coping Framework (Pearlin) • Problem-focused coping aims to alter/manage the problem • Emotion-focused coping aims to reduce/manage emotional distress • Stressful situations • high levels of caregiving demands • severe behavior problems
Amplification ofDepressive Symptoms by Emotion-Focused Coping
Other roles employee caregiver volunteer spouse parent/grandparent friend relative neighbor Multiple Role Effects • Role overload hypothesis • multiple roles are overwhelming • Role enhancement hypothesis • multiple roles promote social integration, social support, and self-esteem
Social Support • Longitudinal effect of social support on psychological well-being • For women in their 60’s. . . • A larger network of friends and family was beneficial • For women in their 70’s and 80’s. . . • More emotional support was beneficial
What Aging Mothers Can Do To Maintain Well-Being • Coping (problem-focused) • Maintain multiple roles • Social support
Challenges For The Future • Creative family-service system partnerships • Extend our understanding of caregiving across multiple contexts • Increase public funding of family-support services