1 / 18

Parks and Recreation Division

PARK LAND ACQUISITION. Parks and Recreation Division. December 15, 2009. PRESENTATION OUTLINE. Overview Land Selection Process Board Action. PRESENTATION OUTLINE. Overview Land Selection Process Board Action. OVERVIEW. Chronology Park Impact Fee – March 2006

etana
Download Presentation

Parks and Recreation Division

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PARK LAND ACQUISITION Parks and Recreation Division December 15, 2009

  2. PRESENTATION OUTLINE • Overview • Land Selection Process • Board Action

  3. PRESENTATION OUTLINE • Overview • Land Selection Process • Board Action

  4. OVERVIEW Chronology • Park Impact Fee – March 2006 • Park Growth Analysis – November 2006 • Land Banking Discussion – October 2008 • Developed Criteria – March 2009 • Parks Advisory Board – September 2009 • Presentation today on potential properties for purchase with Park Impact Fees.

  5. OVERVIEW Park Growth Analysis Recap • Projected population growth through 2030 • Inventoried Community and District parks in County and cities • Identified service gaps in geographic areas based on future population • Deficient 9 Community Parks • Deficient 9 District Parks

  6. OVERVIEW

  7. OVERVIEW Benefits of Purchasing Property for Land Banking • Insufficient funds for new park construction • Operating funds not available for new parks or facilities • Results in minimal maintenance costs • Maintains current acreage level of service • Meets Impact Fee Ordinance requirements • Meets identified needs • Favorable market conditions

  8. OVERVIEW Approved Land Acquisition Budget • Budget FY 09 $6,500,000 • Rybolt Property Acquisition (1,000,000) • Apopka Loop Connector (680,000) • Dr. Phillips Gym Funding 880,00 0* Remaining Balance $5,700,000 *Requesting Board Approval

  9. PRESENTATION OUTLINE • Overview • Land Selection Process • Board Action

  10. LAND SELECTION PROCESS Step 1: • Researched properties for sale in park deficient areas identified in the Park Growth Analysis Step 2: • Applied scoring criteria to identified properties • Similar scoring criteria used in past years for Parks CIP Program • Scoring criteria approved by Parks Advisory Board Step 3: • Ranked properties based on highest scores (maximum score possible 740)

  11. LAND SELECTION PROCESS

  12. LAND SELECTION PROCESS

  13. LAND SELECTION PROCESS Scoring Matrix • Park Growth Analysis – 300 pts. • Current Need vs. Future Need • Access to Site – 100 pts. • Arterial Road Access • Developable Acres – 100 pts. • Accommodate Amenities for Active Recreation

  14. LAND SELECTION PROCESS Scoring Matrix • Clean and Clear Site – 50 pts. • Environmental Concerns • Located in Urban Service Area – 50 pts. • Utilities Available • Water Access – 140 pts. • Additional Recreation Opportunities • Proximity to Existing Parks – (150) pts.

  15. LAND SELECTION PROCESS

  16. PRESENTATION OUTLINE • Overview • Land Selection Process • Board Action

  17. BOARD ACTION • Approval to transfer Park Impact Fee funds from the Dr. Phillips Gym project to the Land Acquisition Program • Approval for staff to begin acquisition of ranked properties, subject to negotiations to include such factors as property cost, availability, location, etc.

  18. PARK LAND ACQUISITION Parks and Recreation Division December 15, 2009

More Related