600 likes | 813 Views
Pictures and Words. Elinor Amit. Behavioral Decision Making: Building Approaches from Laboratory Insights October 31th 2011. How do we think about things?. The 3 main approaches: Words (inner speech) (e.g., Vygotsky, 1934; Oppenheim & Dell, 2010)
E N D
Pictures and Words Elinor Amit Behavioral Decision Making: Building Approaches from Laboratory Insights October 31th 2011
How do we think about things?... The 3 main approaches: • Words (inner speech) (e.g., Vygotsky, 1934; Oppenheim & Dell, 2010) • Pictures (mental imagery) (e.g., Kosslyn et al) • Abstract, a-modal representations (e.g., Caramazza, Hillis, Rapp, & Romani, 1990; Lambon Ralph, Graham, Patterson, & Hodges, 1999; Rapp, Hillis, & Caramazza, 1993; Tyler & Moss, 2001; Mahon & Caramazza, 2008)
How do we think about things?... The 3 main approaches: • Words (inner speech) (e.g., Vygotsky, 1934; Oppenheim & Dell, 2010) • Pictures (mental imagery) (e.g., Kosslyn et al) • Abstract, a-modal representations (e.g., Caramazza, Hillis, Rapp, & Romani, 1990; Lambon Ralph, Graham, Patterson, & Hodges, 1999; Rapp, Hillis, & Caramazza, 1993; Tyler & Moss, 2001; Mahon & Caramazza, 2008)
“the two most vivid forms of working memory are mental images... and snatches of inner speech” Pinker, 2008
Apple Red apple
Differences between words and pictures Red apple
We will discuss today… • The association between medium and psychological distance • The implications of the medium of representation to moral judgment
We will discuss today… • The association between medium and psychological distance • The implications of the medium of representation to moral judgment
Visual representation Proximal event Verbal representation Distal event The medium/morality hypothesis How do we think about things?... It depends… Amit, Algom, & Trope, 2009
What is psychological distance? The distance between an individual and a target. • Subjective • Egocentric
What is psychological distance? • Temporal: How much time separates between the individual’s present and the target event • Spatial: How far in space is the event from the individual • Social: How different is the social target from the individual Bar Anan, Liberman & Trope, 2006
Why is medium associated with distance? • Pictures and words serves different cognitive functions: • Words preserve the invariant & essential properties of the item for a distal use • Pictures preserve the stimulus in details for an immediate use.
Construal Level Theory (CLT) Mental construal processes serve to traverse psychological distances and switch between perspectives. Distal events not so much information => abstract representation, entailing the essence, invariant features of the referent. Proximal events there is information => concrete, subordinate representation. Trope & Liberman, 2003; 2010
Main hypothesis Pictures and words are associated with psychological distance: • People elect to represent close targets in pictures and distal targets in words. • Pictures impart a feeling of proximity, whereas words impart a feeling of distance.
cognitive processing: - Identification - Categorization - Selective attention - Memory • Social cognition: - Interpersonal communication - Moral judgment • Neural correlates
cognitive processing: - Identification - Categorization - Selective attention - Memory • Social cognition: - Interpersonal communication - Moral judgment • Neural correlates
Speeded Identification: Social distance Medium: pictures, words Distance: socially near, far Task: speeded identification football soccer Socially proximal Socially distal Amit, Algom, & Trope, 2009, Jep: General
Speeded Identification: Social distance F(1,13)=7.63, p < .05 Amit, Algom, & Trope, 2009, Jep: General
Speeded Identification: Spatial distance Medium: pictures, words Distance: spatially near, far Task: speeded identification Amit, Algom, & Trope, 2009, Jep: General
Speeded Identification: Spatial distance F(1,15)=6.3, p < .05 Amit, Algom, & Trope, 2009, Jep: General
Mental travel Exp.1: event related design, 11 subjects Exp.2: block design, 10 subjects Tomorrow CHAIR + + + 10 years APPLE 20 sec 1 sec Amit, Rim, Greene, & Trope, in prep
Mental travel (Harvard sample) far>near near>far Language regions Visual regions precuneus Fusiform R calcarine BA47L Fusiform L BA 21 L N=10, p =.001
Interim conclusion Pictures are associated with proximity, whereas words are associated with distance. • This association influence performance in various cognitive tasks (e.g., identification) - People spontaneously elect to represent proximal things visually (embodied cognition), and distal things verbally.
Implications of the medium/distance association for public policy
pressure from the government convenience for costumers existing routes location of main public services paths air pollution cost location of businesses bus driver’s union demands
Walk a lot Wait a little ? Walk a little Wait a lot
We will discuss today… • The association between medium and psychological distance • The implications of the medium of representation to moral judgment
We will discuss today… • The association between medium and psychological distance • The implications of the medium of representation to moral judgment
Visual representation Proximal event Verbal representation Distal event The medium/morality hypothesis The medium/distance hypothesis
Visual representation Proximal event Verbal representation Distal event The medium/morality hypothesis The medium/distance hypothesis
Visual representation Proximal event Verbal representation Distal event The medium/morality hypothesis The medium/distance hypothesis Implications for behavior… • If you see something • Do something!
Pictures “emergency” reaction • Words not so much
Visual processing Psychologically proximal High emotional reaction Verbal processing Psychologically distal Low emotional reaction 5 >1
Visual processing Psychologically proximal Emotionally-driven judgments High emotional reaction “cognitive”-driven judgments Verbal processing Psychologically distal Low emotional reaction 5 >1
5 >1 Yes Dual-Process Moral Cognition ?
No 5 >1 Yes X Greene et al, Cognition, 2009 Dual-Process Moral Cognition ?
Predictions Visual processing deontological judgments (rely on emotional reactions) Verbal processing utilitarian judgments (rely on “controlled” reaction)
Another rationale for the medium/moral judgment prediction Pictures thinking about means (consistent with deontological moral reasoning) Words thinking about end-goals (consistent with utilitarian moral reasoning)
Exp 1: How media preferences are related to moral judgments? L.A. Times Wall Street journal
Exp 1: How media preferences are related to moral judgments? More utilitarian r(108) = 0.233, p = 0.011* After controlling for level of education: r(107) = .22, p = 0.018*
Exp 1: How media preferences are related to moral judgments? More utilitarian Hours/day of TV watching R(170) = -0.18, p = 0.017* After controlling for education: r(169) = -0.18, p = 0.01**
Conclusions from Experiment 1: Media consumption preferences are associated with moral judgments tendencies: Visual deontological style Verbal utilitarian style * Cannot be accounted for by education
Exp 2: How cognitive style is related to moral judgments? Amit & Greene, under revision
Exp 2: How cognitive style is related to moral judgments? N = 50 r = .35 p = .01 R(50)=.346, p < .01 More utilitarian utilitarian Verbal - Visual Accuracy
Conclusions from Experiment 2: Cognitive style is associated with moral judgments tendencies: Visual style deontological Verbal style utilitarian Amit & Greene, under revision
Exp 3: How visual and verbal interference affect moral judgments? Condition 2 Condition 1 You are standing near a footbridge… Enemy soldiers have taken over your village…. 5 sec Is it appropriate to smother your baby? Is it appropriate to smother your baby? 5 sec 2.5 sec no…..yes no…..yes Amit & Greene, under revision
Prediction: • pictorial interference prevents representing the dilemma visually, thus leads to more utilitarian judgment. • Verbal interference prevents representing the dilemma verbally, thus leads to more deontological judgment. Amit & Greene, under revision