1 / 16

SKA 1 AA-low system design considerations

SKA 1 AA-low system design considerations. Andrew Faulkner . SKA 1 AA-low is a major System: >10x LOFAR sensitivity >1 km 2 collecting area >6:1 frequency range 70 – 450MHz ~50 deg 2 Field of View Very quiet site. Required in SKA Memo 125 . But.

etta
Download Presentation

SKA 1 AA-low system design considerations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SKA1 AA-low system design considerations Andrew Faulkner

  2. SKA1 AA-low is a major System: >10x LOFAR sensitivity >1 km2 collecting area >6:1 frequency range 70 – 450MHz ~50 deg2 Field of View Very quiet site Required in SKA Memo 125

  3. But........ It is also part of a bigger vision: SKA2 Some implications....

  4. SKA1 AA-low System requirements Priority • Stand alone instrument meeting SKA1 science goals • Deployable 2016 onwards • Specification will mesh with SKA2 system design e.g. • Frequency range ̶ Data rates • Calibration capability ̶ Correlation requirements etc... • Scaleable architecture for 2018+ commonality with AA-mid • Architecture will support upgraded processing devices • Phase 2 expansion ̶ Retro-fit Phase 1 (if good pay-back) SKA1 performance must not be compromised?

  5. Element requirements

  6. One or two elements?

  7. LWA element: mechanical example Electronics at top – well away from floods etc. Simple “skeleton” elements (delivered flat) Clamp type rotational adjustment Single pole fixing – just sunk into ground Buried cables Cheap mesh groundplane Easy and quick deployment

  8. Integrated AA-low element possibility • Elements onlyconnected by glass....

  9. Where to digitise? Can be done – safe option Likely to require distributed digitisation around station. (Cable cost and range) Requires good, stable analogue design More advanced – more stable Requires: low power, quiet digitisers. Low cost short range optical drivers. Likely, requires custom chips No option to upgrade digitisers.

  10. Potential AA-low station: Safe solution: • Single element Analog to clustered digitisation Centrally powered elements

  11. Station processor Requirements: • High bandwidth in • High bandwidth out • Largely cross connected • Scaleable at various levels • Programmable beamforming

  12. Station size • For a given total Aeff the collector cost is roughly constant • Increasing overhead with many smaller stations • Possibly increasing station processor complexity with large arrays • Total data rate to correlator for a fixed survey speed remains constant whatever number of stations BUT • Correlator and central processor demands become more challenging Station size largely determined by central processing costs

  13. Core Design Core for SKA1AA-low becomes virtually fully filled. More so for SKA2. Core “stations” are not separated – there is a “sea” of elements Design options/considerations to be made: Implies interconnected “station processing”, especially for SKA2 • Non-circular “stations” easier? e.g. Square or hexagonal? • Maximising the sensitivity from each element: • overlapping “stations”? • smaller “stations” (how small) with more correlation? • Apodising element density within areas of the core: • Benefit? Save money? Correlation goes up as n2, but incoming data rate is constant

  14. AA-low: SKA1 to SKA2 Fixed Aspects • Frequency range • Intrinsic to the design • Element & array electromagnetic design • Front end functionality • Analogue implementation • Unlikely to change • Interfaces • Could bypass a level of interconnect Possible Variables • Station size & configuration • Core layout (getting bigger) • Move element positions.....? • Trenching etc. • Processing technology level • Essential for economical deployment • Upgraded calibration methods • Needs flexible processing system

  15. SKA2 System A reminder for AA-mid! A tremendous step forward in SKA2 There must be ongoing development: which will also benefit AA-low

  16. Top design decisions...... Urgent (by CoDR April 2011) • Confirm specification in Memo 125: • Frequency range, sensitivity .... Immediate(by CDR, end 2011): • Single or dual element? • Demonstrable element in small array Medium Term (by AAVS1, end 2013) • Station size and configuration • Core configuration • Station system design • digitisation, processing location, data flow

More Related