100 likes | 388 Views
ECO324 Chapter 3—Modeling Market Failure. 6. Absence of Property Rights. The Coase Theorem Ronald Coase (1910-2013), Nobel Laureate, 1991. Ronald H. Coase: On Economics http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04zFygmeCUA. Property Rights.
E N D
ECO324 Chapter 3—Modeling Market Failure 6. Absence of Property Rights The Coase Theorem Ronald Coase (1910-2013), Nobel Laureate, 1991 Ronald H. Coase: On Economics http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04zFygmeCUA
Property Rights • Valid claims to a good or resource that permit the use and transfer of ownership through sale • For environmental goods, it’s unclear who “owns” rights • Economics says it’s the absence of rights that matters, not who possesses them
Coase Theorem • Proper assignment of property rights, even if externalities are present, will allow bargaining between parties such that efficient solution results, regardless of who holds rights • Assumes costless transactions • Assumes damages are accessible and measurable In economics, a transaction cost is a cost incurred in making an economic exchange. It includes: search and information cost, bargaining cost, and enforcement cost.
See Spot bark. The Coase Theorem: An Example Dick owns a dog named Spot. Negative externality: Spot’s barking disturbs Jane, Dick’s neighbor. The socially efficient outcome maximizes Dick’s + Jane’s well-being. • If Dick values having Spot more than Jane values peace & quiet, the dog should stay. Otherwise, the dog should go. Coase theorem: The private market will reach the efficient outcome on its own…
The Coase Theorem: An Example • CASE 1: Dick has the right to keep Spot (Jane needs to pay Dick to get rid of Spot).Benefit to Dick of having Spot = $500Cost to Jane of Spot’s barking = $800 • Socially efficient outcome: Spot goes bye-bye. • Private outcome: Jane pays Dick $600 to get rid of Spot, both Jane and Dick are better off. • Private outcome = efficient outcome http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwwDkCylj2g
The Coase Theorem: An Example • CASE 2: Dick has the right to keep Spot (Jane needs to pay Dick to get rid of Spot).Benefit to Dick of having Spot = $1000Cost to Jane of Spot’s barking = $800 • Socially efficient outcome: See Spot stay. • Private outcome: Jane not willing to pay more than $800, Dick not willing to accept less than $1000, so Spot stays. • Private outcome = efficient outcome
The Coase Theorem: An Example • CASE 3: Jane has the legal right to peace & quiet (Dick needs to pay Jane to keep Spot). Benefit to Dick of having Spot = $500Cost to Jane of Spot’s barking = $800 • Socially efficient outcome: Spot goes bye-bye. • Private outcome: Dick not willing to pay more than $500, Jane not willing to accept less than $800, so Spot goes bye-bye. • Private outcome = efficient outcome
The Coase Theorem: An Example • CASE 4: Jane has the legal right to peace & quiet (Dick needs to pay Jane to keep Spot). Benefit to Dick of having Spot = $1000Cost to Jane of Spot’s barking = $800 • Socially efficient outcome: Spot stays. • Private outcome: Dick pays Jane $900 to keep Spot, both Jane and Dick are better off. • Private outcome = efficient outcome
The private market achieves the efficient outcome regardless of the initial distribution of rights.
Solution to ExternalitiesGovernment Intervention • Internalize externality by: • Assigning property rights, OR • Setting policy prescription, such as: • Set standards on pollution allowed • Tax polluter (= MEC at QE) • Establish a market and price for pollution a private solution public solutions Ch4 Ch5 Ch5