400 likes | 422 Views
Learn about the sustainable turfgrass management practices in Asia, specifically focusing on selecting the right cultivars based on their performance characteristics. Explore the benefits of different turfgrass types and their establishment methods and costs. Discover the differences between Bermuda grass and Zoysia grass in terms of growth rate, scalping tendency, clipping yield, and ball lie. Gain insights into divot recovery and resistance in different cultivars.
E N D
Selecting Cultivars Based on Specific Performance CharacteristicsSustainable Turfgrass Management in Asia 2012 Doug KarcherAssociate ProfessorDepartment of HorticultureUniversity of Arkansas karcher@uark.edu turf.uark.edu
Tifway hybrid bermudagrass Sod or sprigs
Riviera bermudagrass Seeded
Propagation types • Seeded • Zoysia japonica • Vegetative • Zoysia japonica • Zoysia matrella var. matrella
Why zoysia seed? Summary of establishment methods and costs for zoysiagrass. 1193K baht/ha 375K baht/ha 225K baht/ha 84K Baht/ha
Zoysiagrass establishment rate LSD0.05 = 0.0047 Z. japonica Z. matrella
Trinexapac-ethyl PrimoFairway Experiment • Finer, tighter, and more upright for the treated plot
Sunsport Contessa Veracruz Sovereign Barbados Sultan From: Baldwin, C. M., H. Liu, and L. B. McCarty. 2008. Diversity of 42 bermudagrass cultivars in a reduced light environment. Acta Hort. (ISHS) 783:147-158.
Perceptions about bermuda vs. zoysia • Bermudagrass has a faster growth rate • More clippings • More scalping • Faster divot recovery • Zoysiagrass has higher density • Better ball lie
Bermuda vs. Zoysia Experiment • Plots evaluated over 2 growing seasons, once established. • Plots were mown at 1.3 cm (0.5 in). • 40 kg N ha-1 per growing month for bermudagrass and 25 kg N ha-1 for zoysiagrass.
Growth Rate (clippings) • Clippings were harvested by making two passes in the opposite direction over the same plot. • Clippings were then collected and oven dried at 80 °C for four days. • Dry weights were recorded to quantify clipping yield.
Scalping • Evaluated using digital image analysis • Digital photos taken under controlled lighting conditions and analyzed for % green
Digital image analysis used for scalping tendency • Scalping tendency (%): • [100*((percent green turf before mowing - percent green turf after mowing)/percent green turf before mowing)]. Before mowing 99.4% coverage 22.9% Scalping 76.6% coverage After mowing
Clipping Yield & Scalping Results • The cultivars with lowest clipping yields were Diamond , Meyer, and Patriot. • Palisades, Princess 77, and Tifway had the highest amount of clippings. • Patriot and Tifsportbermudagrass had the highest scalping across the two years of this study. • All other cultivars had minimal scalping
Golf Ball Lie Zorro zoysiagrass Zorro zoysiagrass: 98% ball exposed Palisades zoysiagrass Palisades zoysiagrass: 73% ball exposed
Ball Lie Results • When mown, no differences in ball lie. • Palisades zoysiagrass had the poorest ball lie in unmown conditions.
Divots ~ 0.2 ha turf removed annually per fairway by divoting.
Previous divot recovery research • Bermudagrass (Karcher et al., 2005a) • 2003 results: Riviera, Princess 77, and Patriot > Tifway, Tifsport. • Zoysiagrass (Karcher et al., 2005b) • Palisades, Cavalier, and Zorro had the fastest recovery times. • Meyer consistently had the slowest recovery times. • Although these (Karcher et al., 2005a,b) studies were not performed in the same experiment, they were performed at the same time and location (Fayetteville, AR). • The amount of time required to reach 50% recovery was similar between bermudagrass and zoysiagrass.
Our understandings of divoting • Recuperative potential • Divot recovery vs. divot resistance More susceptible to divoting Less susceptible to divoting
Materials and methods: divot recovery • Plots were divoted on: • 7 July 2008 • 25 August 2008 • 21 May 2009 • Three (subsamples) standardized divots (5 x 10 cm) were taken from each plot using a modified edger (Fry et al., 2008).
Tifwaybermudagrass at day 0 after injury (top) and at day 9 after injury (bottom) Percent recovery was calculated as: 100 * [(%coverx - %cover0) / (100% - %cover0)] day 0 after injury 0% recovery day 9 after injury 72% recovery
Divot Evaluations • Severity • 1 = Very small divot, little to no damage • 2 = Small divot, some injury • 3 = Moderate divot size or disruption • 4 = Large divot • 5 = Worst (very large divot) or severe injury
Summary – divot recovery • Those cultivars with the fastest time to 50% recovery were • Princess 77 and Riviera bermudagrass • Palisades zoysiagrass • Bermudagrasses recovered faster than zoysiagrasses • Keep in mind, these divots were created mechanically
Divot resistancealso differs among cultivars Riviera bermudagrass Diamond zoysiagrass
17 July and 1 September 2009 results – divot severity • Severity
Divot Conclusions • Zoysiagrasses tended to have a greater divot resistance. • Z. matrellacultivars (Cavalier, Diamond, and Zorro) consistently had the greatest divot resistance. • Perceived increases in ball lie of zoysiagrass may be a function of greater divot resistance
Summary Points • Keep your eye on improved, seeded cultivars • Within species, cultivars vary in establishment, growth rate, traffic tolerance, and divot resistance and recovery • Utilize best adapted species and cultivars to minimize inputs needed to produce quality turf • Current & Future Research • Shade , drought, disease, low management inputs
Acknowledgements • Conference organizers • Asian Turfgrass Center • Thai GCSA • The R&A • Dr. Micah Woods