310 likes | 499 Views
A Swedish perspective on adaptation to Climate Change. Jörgen Nilsson Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute Norköping. Nordic hydropower in % of total electricity production. Norway 100% 123 TWh Sweden 45% 66 TWh Finland 12% 8 TWh (approximate figures).
E N D
A Swedish perspective on adaptation to Climate Change Jörgen Nilsson Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute Norköping
Nordic hydropower in % of total electricity production • Norway 100% 123 TWh • Sweden 45% 66 TWh • Finland 12% 8 TWh • (approximate figures)
Inflow to the Swedish hydropower reservoirs in relation to the average for the period 1950-2006 (TWh/year) Source: Svensk Energi
We need regional information 300x300km 50x50km Source: Monitor No. 18, 2003
Emission scenario A2 Emission scenario B2 Precipitation change downscaled by the regional RCO: ECHAM4/OPYC3 HadAM3H
Annual runoff change (mm) Hadley/A2 Annual runoff change (mm) Hadley/B2 Annual runoff change (mm) Echam/A2 Annual runoff change (mm) Echam/B2
Future production potential in Swedish rivers 1961-1990 vs 2071-2100
Implications: Less demand for heating … but more for cooling 1961-1990 2011-2040 2041-2070 2071-2100 CDD HDD Heating degree days per year, T<17oC Cooling degree days per year, T>20oC A2
Impacts on designfloods in Sweden % change in design flood peak, 1961-1990 vs 2071-2100
Changes in 100-years floods according to E/A2 and E/B2scenarios
Changes in 100-years floods according to H/A2 and H/B2scenarios
The Nordic energy sector is very sensitive to global warming: • It effects production (inflow to hydropower, wind, biomass) • It effects consumption (heating) • It effects safety (storms, dam safety) • It effects distribution (storms)
The most evident impact is that on hydropower, impacts on wind power are more inconclusive • Hydropower production is expected to increase • The annual rythm in river flow will be more favorable • Impact on dam safety is not self-evident and has to be analysed carefully, case by case • The development of the future European energy market will have strong impact on the Nordic hydropower industry
The Swedish Commission on Climate and Vulnerability • Addresses impacts, vulnerability, responsibilities and costs due to climate change • Sub-report on flooding, November 2006 • Final report, October 2007
Mälaren Stockholm Karlstad Örebro Hjälmaren Vänern Vättern Göta älv Gothenburg Future flood risks around the big Swedish lakes
Stockholm in April 2003 Foto: Sten Bergström, SMHI
Lake Mälaren and Stockholm, summary of the problems • Decree for regulation in 1943 • Pressure on exploitation, shore lines are not secure under today’s climate. Important downtown infrastructure is at risk, including the subway • Important shipping • But… • No river downstream hinders discharge • Sea level rise is compensated by uplift of land • Climate change does not seem to increase the problems
Large land slides in the Göta älv valley 1: Jordfallsskredet 1150, 65 har 3: Intagan 1648-07-10, 27har 6: Ballabo mars 1733, 3 har 9: Utby 1806-12-21, 4,5 har 10: Västerlanda ca 1830, >5 har 12: Surte 1950-09-29, 24 har 14: Göta 1957-06-07, 32 har 15: Agnesberg 1993-04-14, 0,25har 16: Ballabo 1996-04-16, 0,7 har Source: Statens Geotekniska Institut
Inundated areas at peak level if Climate Changeis considered will be about 50 cm higher than today
Changes in the 100-years levels and return periods for Lake Vänern according to climate scenarios
Attractive near-shore developments in the city of Karlstad Foto: Sten Bergström, SMHI
Vänern- Göta älv, summary of the problems • Decree for regulation in 1937 • Pressure on exploitation, shore lines are not secure under today’s climate • Hydropower in the river • Important shipping • Unstable geology limits discharge in the river. Land slides may risk water supply for 700 000 citizens • Sea levels hinder discharge • Climate change increases the problems
Conclusions • Big lakes mean big problems in metropolitan areas • Today’s flooding problems will be aggravated by climate change in western Sweden • Stockholm can be secured by a doubling of the discharge capacity of Lake Mälaren • There is no simple solution for Lake Vänern and River Göta älv. A combination of measures will be needed. • Cautious physical planning is necessary to avoid future problems everywhere
How to handle all that unavoidable uncertainty? • Use ensembles of climate models and scenarios • Develop flexible adaptation strategies • Add safety margins wherever reasonably possible • Communicate!