Richard Fiene, Ph.D. Penn State University

1. Evaluation of Keystone STARS Quality Rating System: Part of a Multi-Dimensional Model for Improving Child Care Quality* Richard Fiene, Ph.D. Penn State University *Paper presented at NAEYC Research Symposium, June 9, 2007, University of Pittsburgh

2. Methods for Achieving Quality Child Care GOALS NONREGULATORY METHODS REGULATORY METHODS Accreditation Public Education Credentialing Training of caregivers & admin Rate setting Fiscal regulation Approval of public operated programs Association membership Newsletters., Journals & Books Environmental health Licensing or registration Building & fire safety Zoning Base line or floor of quality below which no service may legally operate Development of Resource & Referral Centers Illegal unlicensed operations Exempt programs Criminal sanctions YOUNG CHILDREN Vol. 34 No. 6 Sept. 1979, pp. 22-27 Gwen G Morgan Abuse & neglectful care

3. Regulatory Approaches toward Achieving Quality • Credentialing:A formally recognized process of certifying an individual as having fulfilled certain criteria or requisites. • Contracts: Regulation by contract in which performance standards are imposed as a contractual obligation. • Accreditation: The formal recognition that an agency or organization has compiled with the requisites for accreditation by an accrediting body. Accreditation usually requires the organization seeking this form of recognition to pay for the cost of the process. The organization bestowing the accreditation has no legal authority to compel compliance. It can only remove accreditation standing. • Best Practices: Through affiliation with professional organizations, an agency becomes aware of “best practices” and establishes its own goals to achieve a higher level of care services.

4. Non-Regulatory Approaches to Achieving Quality Care in Child Care Programs • Consultation • Consumer Education • Peer Support Associations • Professional Organizations • Resource and Referral • Technical Assistance • Training-Staff Development • Quality Rating Systems

5. ZERO TO THREE’s Better Care for the Babies Project: A System’s Approach to State Child Care Planning—Griffin/Fiene, 1995 Inputs Processes Outcomes Agency Rule Making Authority Interagency Review Consistent Data Collection Combined/Cost-Effective Use of Resources to Meet State Priorities Comparison State Standards to National Guidelines Identifying Gaps & Weakness Regulations, Requirements, Codes, Funding Rules Strength/Clarity of Rules Reduced Duplication of Rules Consistency Across Agencies Compliance Study &State Profile Rule Change/Clarification Guidance Material Training & TA Consumer Materials Monitoring System Surveillance Licensing Registration Certification Monitoring Efficiency Program Compliance Targeting Resources to Areas of Need Monitoring Effectiveness Training & Technical Assistance Program Compliance Weighted Indicator Checklist CCR&R Local CC Programs CC Organizations Consumers Monitors Field Survey Focus Groups Public Hearings Consensus-Building Increased State-Local Cooperation

6. Pennsylvania Early Childhood Quality Studies • 2006 = Barnard, Etheridge Smith, Fiene, & Swanson (2006) • 2002 = Fiene, Greenberg, Bergsten, Fegley, Carl, & Gibbons (2002) • 1996 = Iutcovich, Fiene, Johnson, Koppel, & Langan (1998, 2001) • 1990 = Melnick & Fiene (1990) • 1984 = Kontos & Fiene (1986, 1987) • 1978 = Fiene & Aronson (1979)

7. 2006 ECE Quality Study (Keystone STARS) Methodology • 572 programs • 356 Child Care Centers • 135 Family Child Care Homes • 81 Group Child Care Homes • ECERS/FDCRS Assessments

8. Key Findings from 2006 ECE Quality Study (Keystone STARS) • Child care quality is improving • Keystone STARS centers show higher quality • Programs with a defined curriculum have higher quality • Teachers with college degrees provide higher quality early education

9. Early Childhood Quality Data (2006): ECERS Scores by STAR Level STAR LevelECERS Scores • Not in STARS 3.90 • Start with STARS 4.08 • STAR 1 4.20 • STAR 2 4.45 • STAR 3 4.95 • STAR 4 5.42

10. Comparisons to Previous Early Childhood Quality Studies (1978-2006) YearECERS Scores • 1978 4.75 (CDPES) • 1984 4.00 • 1990 4.00 • 1996 4.50 • 2002 4.00 • 2006 3.90 Not in STARS • 2006 4.11 Start with STARS • 2006 4.33 STAR 1 & 2 • 2006 5.25 STAR 3 & 4

11. ECERS Scores by STAR Level

12. ECERS Comparisons to Previous Early Childhood Quality Studies

13. For additional information: Richard Fiene, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Human Development Penn State University W-157 Olmsted Building Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 717-329-7309 Rjf8@psu.edu http://www.hhdev.psu.edu/cahhdi/