1 / 11

Evolution of Social Behavior

Evolution of Social Behavior. Costs of group living:. 1. Increased conspicuousness - crypsis is not an available means of predator avoidance. 2. Increased intraspecific competition for food and mates, especially in cases with dominance hierarchies.

evers
Download Presentation

Evolution of Social Behavior

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evolution of Social Behavior Costs of group living: 1. Increased conspicuousness - crypsis is not an available means of predator avoidance. 2. Increased intraspecific competition for food and mates, especially in cases with dominance hierarchies. 3. Increased risk of parasitism/diseases. 4. Increased potential for inbreeding and potential inbreeding depression. Benefits of group living: 1. Selfish herd phenomenon. 2. Cooperative predator defense is possible. 3. Cooperative hunting is possible. 4. Information sharing and cultural inheritance are possible. 5. Division of labor possible.

  2. Polyandry, polygyny, & male-biased dispersal Male gametes are cheap relative to female gametes. This explains why polygyny is so much more common than polyandry. Mate choice is usually driven by females. Manifestations of sexual selection are usually seen in males (e.g., antlers).

  3. Polyandry, polygyny, & male-biased dispersal Male gametes are cheap relative to female gametes. This may explain the pattern of female philopatry and male dispersal in mammals. Hamilton et al., (2005. Genetics. 170:409) used genetic data to estimate dispersal among 5 populations of Microtusarvalis.

  4. Kin selection and altruism in Urocitellusbeldingi

  5. Carnivores and Social Behavior Most Carnivores are solitary, or asocial. Ursids are asocial.

  6. Carnivores and Social Behavior Canids Canis lupus Vulpesvulpes Lyaconpictus

  7. Carnivores and Social Behavior Felids Pantheraleo up to 4 breeding females, several non-breeding females 2 males may or may not be related females are related and hunt cooperatively. satellite males belong to no pride, attempt sneak copulations

  8. Carnivores and Social Behavior Hyaenids Crocutacrocuta Clans of up to 80, both males and females. Individuals forage alone. These groups form to defend kills from lions.

  9. Carnivores and Social Behavior Mustelids Melesmeles - They forage alone and are rather omnivorous - Live in communal dens, called setts. - A clan of 10’s of animals occupy the setts for generations - Clans defend a territory and share in burrowing work.

  10. Carnivores and Social Behavior Herpestids Helogaleparvula There’s a very complex social system. Dominant breeding pair and several non-reproductive individuals. They forage independently. There is cooperative predator defense. They give alarm calls and there’s a division of labor.

  11. Resource Dispersion Hypothesis Common set of starting conditions - Basic territoriality - Individuals defend the smallest area that will support them in a bad year. - Size of the territory depends on dispersion of resources. - The key is that it’s usually not a bad year and resources are readily available. - Therefore, a single “territory” may support >1 individual most of the time. - Most often, benefits to group living outweigh the costs. A recent paper has summarized support for this that’s been generated over the years. (Johnson et al. 2002. TREE. 17:563)

More Related