230 likes | 327 Views
NewExt: WP2 Mortality Risk Valuation - Results and uses for Externe. University of Bath Project Meeting May 26th, 2003 PSI. UK WTP Estimates (Full parametric model -Weibull distribution). Key questions to ask of results.
E N D
NewExt: WP2 Mortality Risk Valuation- Results and uses for Externe University of BathProject Meeting May 26th, 2003 PSI
UK WTP Estimates(Full parametric model -Weibull distribution)
Key questions to ask of results • What is the effect of age on WTP for reductions in one’s own risk of death? • What is the effect of health on WTP for reductions in one’s own risk of death? • How is WTP affected by latency?
Annual value of statistical life (Euro) with immediate risk reduction
WTP Regression results (5:1000 immediate) • Age • no association between respondent age and WTP • baseline risk not significantly associated with WTP But • expected years to live is +ve and significant • “probability of living to 70” and “age respondents expect to die” variables also +ve and significant
WTP Regression results(5:1000 immediate) • Higher education levels associated with lower WTP • Higher income associated with higher WTP • Own chronic illness associated with higher WTP, though illness in family associated with lower WTP
WTP Regression results (5:1000 immediate) • WTP lower if respondents doubted effectiveness of product • WTP lower for respondents did not think whether they could afford the product
WTP Regression (5:1000 future) • WTP for future risk reduction increases with (log) chance of surviving to 70 • WTP for future risk reduction decreases when respondent thinks their health will be worse in future • Other variables not significant
ExternE Requirements • Air pollution context • epidemiological results only allow quantification of loss of life expectancy (LLE) • epidemiology suggests elderly in health most likely to be vulnerable to premature death from air pollution • need to convert WTP for risk to LLE
Risk change - LLE conversion • Intuitively, if survival probability in future time periods rises, result will be rise in life expectancy - conversions made by Ari.
Policy Relevance of VLYL • Epidemiology suggests AQ policy of permanent change of 10ug/m3 of PM2.5 results in 6 month rise in life expectancy • Implied central values for 6 month rise in LE are: • contemporaneous risk: Euro 3,950 • latent risk: Euro 2,505
Outstanding issues • EU policy context: need pooled results to finalise recommended values • Extensions of existing methodology • small-scale testing of 2 variants in France • change “product” to “public health programme” • change risk reduction to increase in life expectancy
French Variants • change “product” to “public health programme” • Because, e.g.: • culture of free medical treatment in EU means respondents have difficulty in understanding health actions in terms of costs
French Variants • change risk reduction to increase in life expectancy • Because: • respondents may not understand probabilities • want toavoidhaving to mak eartificial conversion between WTP for risk change and LE change
Future Work • Provide final values for ExternE from pooled data • Estimate direct WTP values for appropriate changes in life expectancy - NEEDS?