1 / 14

WHO KNOWS WHAT LURKS IN THE PI MIND - WE DO

WHO KNOWS WHAT LURKS IN THE PI MIND - WE DO. ONLY THE SHADOW (SYSTEM) KNOWS Randi Wasik, MBA, Director of Administration and Finance, University of Washington. THE AWARD LIFE CYCLE. AWARD ADMINISTRATION. Reasonable, Allowable, Allocable – the grant management holy grail

evette
Download Presentation

WHO KNOWS WHAT LURKS IN THE PI MIND - WE DO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WHO KNOWS WHAT LURKS IN THE PI MIND - WE DO ONLY THE SHADOW (SYSTEM) KNOWS Randi Wasik, MBA, Director of Administration and Finance, University of Washington

  2. THE AWARD LIFE CYCLE

  3. AWARD ADMINISTRATION • Reasonable, Allowable, Allocable – the grant management holy grail • Put the correct charges on the correct fund right from the start. • Undue cost transfers are a compliance issue. • Reconcile fund activity monthly. • Process all corrections as quickly as possible. • Communicate with PI or designee monthly to review past expenditures and future projections. • Do projections / burn rate and include IDCs!

  4. SHADOW SYSTEMS • Plan – they should serve both you and your faculty - transparency • Model so they can accomplish multiple goals • Be consistent • Do regularly • Get up and meet with your faculty to review and discuss • Have the faculty sign the reports • More than one set of eyes • Use electronic tools

  5. COST TRANSFER DEFINITION • Transfer of cost from one institutional account to another • Cost transfers can occur between: • two sponsored accounts • from a non-sponsored account to a sponsored account, • from a sponsored account to a non-sponsored account, • between two non-sponsored accounts

  6. EFFORT REPORTING • Federal regulations require that the effort of all individuals compensated or contributing effort to a federal project is verified. • Effort is percent of total time an individual spends on all work-related activities (research, teaching, patient care, administration, etc.) within their institution. • Cannot exceed 100%. • Not based on 40 hour work week. • Effort reporting certifies to the sponsors that effort committed to a project was completed.

  7. SUB RECIPIENT MONITORING • Institutions are responsible for programmatic, administrative and financial monitoring of all awards made to sub-recipients under sponsored projects. • Institutions have an obligation to monitor the sub recipients activities throughout the life of the award. •  Responsibilities include - PI, Department and  Institution.

  8. OTHER TRACKING NEEDS • Equipment • IRB • IACUC • Invoicing and Accounts Receivable • Scheduled Payments • Use for future budgeting and forecasting • Plan, forecast and account

  9. REPORTING • Financial Reports: • All expenditures posted? • All expenditures appropriate? • Equipment reports • Who owns the property now: Institution or Sponsor? • What is its distribution? • Is it still being used?

  10. REPORTING, CONTINUED • Releases (Normally for Contracts)Payment linked to timing or milestones/deliverables • Deficit Balances (Overruns) • Cannot be shifted to other awards • Cannot be included in F&A cost pools • Surpluses • Cost Reimbursement Agreements – Returned to Sponsor • Fixed Price Agreements (including Clinical Trials) – Retained by Institution

  11. AUDITS • Anticipate the project will be audited. • Manage the award correctly from the beginning. • Audits often take place several years after the project is completed. • Organized Files • Documentation for expenses including explanations of why items were charged • Appropriate Approvals • Audit Trails

  12. Research Stewardship and Compliance: Principles and Responsibilities Cost Policy and Financial Management Principle: Ensures fair and reasonable costs to the Government. Reasonable Allocation of Costs, Effort Reporting, Sub-recipient Monitoring, Cost Transfers, Indirect Costs, Cost Sharing Conduct of Research Principle: Ensures validity of results & maximizes return on public investment. Conflict of Interest, Research Integrity, Data, Resource Sharing, Cyber Security, Public access to Publications, Conflict of Commitment Protections/Safeguards Principle: Provides for welfare of researchers, subjects, & environment. Human Subjects, Animal Welfare,HIPAA, Select Agents, Radiation, Environmental Health & Safety, Hazardous Materials, Radiation, Recombinant DNA, Lab safety Public Policy Principle: Meets national social, economic, & security interests. SEVIS/Visas, Export controls Race, Gender, & Handicap Equality & Education, Lobbying, Debarment, Drug Use, USA Patriot Act Originally Created by Geoff Grant, Partners Health Care

  13. Florida International Univ.Effort Certification & Direct Costs $11.5 million Impact of Non-Compliance Johns Hopkins Univ. Effort Certification $2.7 million University of MinnesotaMisuse of federal funds $32 million New York University Medical CenterInflated Research Grant Costs$15.5 million Univ. California, San Francisco Animal Care Allegations $92,500 fine Univ. of Southern CaliforniaQuestioned Costs HHS/OIG Audit $400,000 Significant Audits & Settlements Mayo FoundationMischarging Federal Grants $6.5 million East Carolina UnivQuestioned Costs HHS/OIG Audit $2.4 million Univ Alabama, BirminghamEffort Certification & Clinical Research Billing $3.4 million Cornell MedicalClinical Research Issues $4.4 million Harvard/BIDMC Costing Issues (Self-Reported) $3.25 million Northwestern University Committed Time/Effort $5 million

  14. DISCUSSION and QUESTIONS

More Related