1 / 45

Serving Special Populations in California Community Colleges

Serving Special Populations in California Community Colleges. Laurie Harrison Special Populations Collaborative Project and Joint Special Populations Advisory Committee. Research Questions:. What services are provided and what are the barriers ?

evita
Download Presentation

Serving Special Populations in California Community Colleges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Serving Special Populations in California Community Colleges Laurie Harrison Special Populations Collaborative Project and Joint Special Populations Advisory Committee

  2. Research Questions: • What services are provided and what are the barriers? • What is the impact of career and technical training?

  3. What Services are Provided?What are the Barriers? • Data source: • Special Populations Collaborative Project, West Hills Community College District

  4. Survey Methodology • Electronically administered to all colleges • Personal follow-up of non-respondents • 94 colleges responded (87%)

  5. Survey Results

  6. Where do Colleges Focus Attention?

  7. Services Provided by Colleges • Career Counseling 96% • Voc Ed Marketing 89% • Child care & Textbooks 82% • Interpreters 70% • Transportation 60%

  8. Barriers Encountered by Colleges • Need to address remedial skills 80% • Insufficient Funds 77% • Low recruitment & retention 64% • Transportation 59% • Inadequate job market 51% • Insufficient staff 50% • Insufficient facilities 39% • Inadequate support services 30% • Timing of classes 25% • Lack of institutional support 16%

  9. Survey results were also reported by: • Each of the six special population groups • Each community college region

  10. Selected Findings

  11. Career Counseling for Special Population Students • Career counseling was most frequently provided activity for each special population group. • However, the students who were least likely to get career counseling were nontraditional students. • May indicate a need for counseling with a nontraditional focus.

  12. For nontraditional students: • Developing/Disseminating vocational marketing materials was the second highest activity. • Yet, low recruitment was the highest ranking problem for these students. • Clearly a need for more effective recruitment strategies for nontraditional students.

  13. Transportation Factor • Transportation was the least frequently provided activity. • Yet, lack of transportation was the fourth greatest barrier. • Need to address transportation for special population students.

  14. Transition to the workplace • Most frequently listed as a barrier for students with disabilities and limited English proficient students. • A need for better coordination with employers and the workplace for these two target groups.

  15. What are Effective Practices? • Categorized by target population • For each practices there is a description and contact information

  16. Survey Results and Effective Practices available at: • www.jspac.org (Website of the Joint Special Populations Advisory Committee) • www.vteabp.org (Website of the California community college industry/technology collaborative project which is coordinating with the special populations collaborative project.)

  17. What Effect is Career and Technical Training having on Special Population Students? Data source: “Success for All” Study Anita Mathur, U.C. Berkeley for Joint Special Populations Advisory Committee

  18. Methodology • Examined records of students who exited the community college system in 1999-2000, and • Earned a vocational degree, certificate, or 12 units of vocational credit. • Linked these students’ data with Employment Department wage data. • 48,000 students in the sample

  19. Compared students from special populations groups to other students • Examined data for each special population group

  20. Major Findings

  21. The number of special population students: • 52% of students in the sample were classified in at least 1 special population group. • The sample included only completers or those with 12 units. • We know that special populations drop out at higher rates therefore initial percentages for special populations students are higher.

  22. Special population students are more likely to be: • Female • Non-white • Lacking a high school diploma • Unemployed or earning less prior to entering community college

  23. Increased Earnings • After receiving career and technical education: • Special population women increased median annual earnings by 182% • Special population men increased median annual earnings by 149%

  24. Learn More - Earn More • The more vocational education attained, the more likely special populations students are to be employed year round. • Students with associates degrees or 60+ unit certificates benefit the most. • Therefore, encourage longer length programs

  25. Nontraditional Careers Pay Off for Women • Women in nontrad careers earn more than women in traditional occupations. • The one exception is nursing • Therefore, encourage nontraditional enrollment

  26. Equal work does not always mean equal pay • Women in nontraditional careers still earn less than their male counterparts.

  27. Findings for Particular Special Population Groups:

  28. Students with Disabilities • Disabled students were the most likely special population group to earn an Associates Degree. • But they had the lowest post college earnings. • Need to work on employer interface for students with disabilities.

  29. Limited English Proficient Students: • LEP women are most likely to leave with only a certificate. • They showed lower gains in income (only slightly ahead of disabled students). • Encourage LEP student to pursue more in-depth training.

  30. Economically Disadvantaged Students: • Only about 9% of economically disadvantaged students go into nontraditional programs where earnings are highest. • Encourage economically disadvantaged to consider nontraditional training.

  31. “Success for All” study available at: www.jspac.org (Website of the Joint Special Populations Advisory Committee)

  32. Data over time

  33. Core Indicator #2 -Completions

  34. Core indicator #3a - Employment one year later

  35. Strategies to Increase Completions for • Single Parents • Displaced Homemakers • Economically Disadvantaged Students

  36. Key support person • Financial support including transportation • Support groups or clubs • Role models • Mentors • Classes on parenting, money management, and stress management • Identify transferable skills • Interview and work clothes

  37. Strategies to help Limited English Proficient students stay in school longer and succeed in the workplace

  38. Become aware of cultural differences • Create group projects and flexible seating arrangements • Write lesson objectives/key points on board • Provide foreign language dictionaries and thesauruses

  39. Strategies to help students with disabilities succeed

  40. Ensure that the environment is well-equipped, accessible, and welcoming • Work closely with DSP&S • Promote teamwork and cooperative learning • Incorporate role models who are disabled • Work closely with potential employers

  41. Strategies to increase Nontraditional enrollment and success

  42. Refer to “high skill - high wage” programs rather than “nontraditional” programs • Expose students to role models, job sites • Recruit in groups • Create nontraditional student clubs/support groups • Prepare students for the nontraditional workplace

  43. Remember • Special population students increase their incomes by 149 - 182%! • And the more they learn, the more they earn!

  44. So…… • Spread the word about the effectiveness of Career and Technical Education for Special Population Students! AND…..

  45. Toot Your Own Horn!

More Related