120 likes | 265 Views
AMETIST Review Meeting June 19, 2003, Brussels. AMETIST Case Study 3: Real-time Service Allocation for Car Periphery Supervision. Stefan Kowalewski Robert Bosch GmbH Corporate Research and Development Frankfurt, Germany stefan.kowalewski@de.bosch.com. Outline.
E N D
AMETIST Review MeetingJune 19, 2003, Brussels AMETIST Case Study 3:Real-time Service Allocationfor Car Periphery Supervision Stefan Kowalewski Robert Bosch GmbH Corporate Research and Development Frankfurt, Germany stefan.kowalewski@de.bosch.com
Outline • Short Range Radar: Automotive Applications and Challenges • CPS Platform • Analysis Model as Problem Description FV/SLD-Kowalewski, September 2002
Short Range Radar: Automotive Applications • Parking Assistance ( Automatic Parking) • ACC ( ACC Stop & Go) • Pre-Crash-Detection ( Collision Mitigation) • Dead Angle Supervision( Lane Change Assistant) FV/SLD-Kowalewski, September 2002
Challenges • Traditional development: Each application has dedicated sensors, actuators, ECU, Software and HMI. • No longer possible due to number of applications, cost, space. • Platform development needed: • Integration of applications (services) • Sharing of distributed resources (sensors, ECU, data) • Different variants • Real-time requirements for single applications must be met by integrated system • Model-based analysis necessary FV/SLD-Kowalewski, September 2002
CPS platform • Applications: Pre-Crash and Parking Assistance • One ECU per Sensor and one central ECU per cluster • Two sensor modes: • D (distance) mode: 1 - 7 m (D1), 1 - 2 m (D2) • Cv (closing velocity): 0.69 - 1.41 m • D2 is for recovery from precrash situation • Hard response time requirements, in particular lead time for precrash indication • Different HW and OS platforms: OSEK / dedicated scheduler FV/SLD-Kowalewski, September 2002
Problem description (deliverable 3.1.3) • Abstracted but realistic specification • Restriction to one sensor group (front cluster) • Analysis model of basic components and their reponsibilities: • Abstract components/connectors view • Scheduling not considered • Few problem formulations • Basis for further refinement FV/SLD-Kowalewski, September 2002
Analysis model: Context FV/SLD-Kowalewski, September 2002
Analysis model: CPS system FV/SLD-Kowalewski, September 2002
Analysis model: Sensor FV/SLD-Kowalewski, September 2002
Analysis model: ECU FV/SLD-Kowalewski, September 2002
Open problems • Current situation: • No complete prototype existing; only parts can be tested. • Timing still based on estimations and assumptions. • Any results on the relation between environment properties and timing requirements are welcome. • Examples: • Implications for object numbers/velocities/distances from the lead time requirements for Pre-Set and Pre-Fire? • How robust is the 15 ms frequency (in case of delays, or additional components)? • Optimal assignment to OSEK tasks? FV/SLD-Kowalewski, September 2002
Future of SRR development at Bosch unclear • Business unit decided to put SRR component development on hold. • Possible decisions in future: • Buy SRR components and sell systems • Replace SRR (24 GHZ) by LRR (77 GHz) • Start SRR component development again • Consequence: platform development currently in waiting loop FV/SLD-Kowalewski, September 2002