260 likes | 395 Views
Justice Reform. The judicial perspective. Topics. Common ground Managing change Budgets Four lessons Surprises. Netherlands:. Leeuwarden. Groningen. Alkmaar. Amsterdam. Assen. Haarlem. Zwolle. Utrecht. Almelo. ‘s-Gravenhage. Zutphen. Dordrecht. Rotterdam. Arnhem. Middelburg.
E N D
Justice Reform The judicial perspective
Topics • Common ground • Managing change • Budgets • Four lessons • Surprises
Netherlands: Leeuwarden Groningen Alkmaar Amsterdam Assen Haarlem Zwolle Utrecht Almelo ‘s-Gravenhage Zutphen Dordrecht Rotterdam Arnhem Middelburg Breda Roermond Maastricht ‘s-Hertogenbosch 19 District Courts 5 Appeal Courts Supreme Court Central Appeals Council Council of State 62 local courts!
Staff • 2200 judges • 1177 men 1023 women • 5839 court staff • 461 staff in national services • Source: Judicial Council Annual Report 2004
My Legal Career as Example • University law degree • Judicial training – 6 years in house and courses • 1987 Judge district court • 1993 local court Amsterdam • 1998 Program manager for IT policy • Civil chamber, Court of Appeals
What do we agree on? Reasons: • Growing caseload • Development in technology • Increasing political interest • International developments • Outcomes: Council, budget
Other Issues • Governance • Change management • Transparency • Case handling • External relations
Governance old Model Presidents’ Assembly Minister of Justice Court President Court Director Judges Court Staff
Court Improvement Program • Case handling • Court management • Governance • External relations
Improving Courts: Methodology 1 Program 20 Project teams Judiciary led Multi disciplinary
Improving Courts: philosophy • Cooperation • Support • Knowledge based • Not bureaucratic
Improving Courts: Results Legislation Governance Web kiosk Quality system Raised awareness
Improving Courts: Outcomes Court Management Judicial Council www.rechtspraak.nl Quality system Critical mass of change managers
Court management and budgets • More than 20 years of discussion • Judiciary: No independence without budget • Judicial council budgeting authority • Courts get budget based on number of cases disposed
Integral Management (Presidents’ Assembly) Minister of Justice Council for the Judiciary Court Board President, Sector Presidents, Court Director Judges and Court Staff
Court Budgeting • Open system: cases filed uncertain • Budget based on cases disposed x price • Case price based on standards • Undefended small claim: € 15 • Estimated number disposed before • Actual number disposed - recalculation
Meet the Judicial Council • 5 - full time • 3 judges • 2 non judiciary • 6 year term • renewable
Meet the Judicial Council • Mission: Improving societal • quality of judicial organization • Policy • External relations • Budget • Advisory • Change management
Aligning Reform in Coherent Programs Criminal Civil Admin IT Program Legislative advice
Lesson: Money Counts • Need for good statistics • Keep checking • 1992-2002 • Good for transparency • And for productivity • But quality control is needed!!!
Lesson: Quality Matters Measuring judicial quality Different instruments • Statistics • Surveys • Auditing
Lesson: Strange Effects 4 examples • Government commitment • Local courts • IT as catalyst for change • Everybody wants computers
Lesson: People Matter Most • Agendas • Allies • Changing minds • Critical mass • Ownership