200 likes | 371 Views
Caring for orphaned children in China. Xiaoyuan Shang, Karen R Fisher Social Policy Research Centre Seminar Series, 29 April 2014. Outline. Chinese social policy context Alternative care principles and types Research questions and process Orphans profile
E N D
Caring for orphaned children in China Xiaoyuan Shang, Karen R Fisher Social Policy Research Centre Seminar Series, 29 April 2014
Outline Chinese social policy context Alternative care principles and types Research questions and process Orphans profile Case study examples – foster care, kinship care, NGO Implications for mixed child welfare policy
Chinese policy context • 570,000+ orphans – 1-2 parents died or cannot be found • Extended family responsible • Ministry of Civil Affairs if no extended family • Developing, transition country • Changing values, less informal care • Government support systems only in developed areas
Principles of good alternative care UN Guidelines on the Alternative Care of Children (UNGACC 2009) • family based care • preserving identity • permanency • child participation in alternative care processes
Forms of alternative care in China Informal kinship care Foster care Adoption Family group care Residential care
Research questions • How many orphaned children are in China, cared for by the state or in their communities? • What are the main forms of alternative care in China? Do they provide adequate care and protection to orphaned children? • What are the living experiences of these children in different alternative care, and what role does the state, kinship care, and other parties play in fulfilling their rights? • What are the official policies for supporting these children and how are the policies changing?
Methods • National Census of Orphans • National Sample Survey of State Child Welfare Institutions • In-depth research sites - 39 • Questionnaires, interviews, focus groups, observation • Children, families, officials, schools, social networks, organisations
Reasons orphaned • Illness • Accident • Natural disaster • Abandoned • Broader social policy implications
State child welfare institutions Hold the formal guardianship of orphans without extended family Historically cared for children in the institution. Now mixed: • Arrange adoption, foster care, family group care • Institutional care for transition, temporary, permanent, medical and disability support
Foster care policy changes Deinstitutionalisation • Local response to high number of orphans and financial constraints – central government funding insufficient for institutional care • Promoted as good practice by international NGOs • Child welfare goals • Changing role of the state – community, NGOs • Regulations for quality foster care (2003) Still not formalised in policy as preferable to institutional care
Rural informal kinship care Formal and informal social contract • Grandparents required to care for orphans • Paternal and maternal uncles and aunts accept responsibility • Occasional government support – social security, education Gender bias • Responsibility more frequent for orphaned boy • Marginalisation of mother if father dies Risks to children’s rights • Losing grandparent carers • Poverty and stress in kinship care households
NGO children’s welfare services Range in quality and services • International, domestic • Charity, religious, social service, child rights orientations • Registered, unregistered, individual household • Institutional care, group care, foster care, adoption Government role formalising from 2013 but ambivalent • Guardianship – unregistered birth • Good practice alternative care • Regulating quality
Further case studies Kinship care in Autonomous Region – cultural considerations Foster mother villages Children affected by HIV – villages with unsafe injecting drug use or plasma donation
Social welfare responses Basic Living Security Allowance for Orphans (2010) Other household social security Land assets for rural orphans Health care – urban family responsibility; Rural Cooperative Health Care Education – 9 years free compulsory schooling
Implications for mixed child welfare Child welfare policy and local implementation gaps • Prevention and protection for welfare children in families • Access to education, health and disability support • Law and governance of alternative care – guardianship, registered birth • Support for extended family carers and community Formalise alternative care • Finance, quality, principles of alternative care: • family based care; preserving identity; permanency; child participation
Resources Shang, X., Fisher, K.R. (2013), Caring for Orphaned Children in China, Lexington Books, Lanham. Chinese social policy projects www.sprc.unsw.edu.au/research/projects/?keyword=china&simple=Search x.shang@unsw.edu.au karen.fisher@unsw.edu.au 02 9385 7800