1 / 6

Retail Management: Reverse discrimination and forced equal opportunity employment statistics.

Retail Management: Reverse discrimination and forced equal opportunity employment statistics. Anton Kusal. Gender Equalization. Supervisors and managers in retail chains Men and women have near ‘perfect’ distributions of managerial positions. Managers in non-retail environments

ezra
Download Presentation

Retail Management: Reverse discrimination and forced equal opportunity employment statistics.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Retail Management:Reverse discrimination and forced equal opportunity employment statistics. Anton Kusal

  2. Gender Equalization • Supervisors and managers in retail chains • Men and women have near ‘perfect’ distributions of managerial positions. • Managers in non-retail environments • Men tend to have a larger portion of promotions to supervisor positions. • Qualification vs. Reputation

  3. Retail Sales Managers • In the state of Oregon, 51.5% of retail supervisors are male and 48.5% are female. (http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/broker)

  4. Non-Retail Sales Managers • 69.2% of supervisors not associated with retail sales are male. • Females only comprise of 30.8% of these positions. (http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/broker)

  5. Questions • At what point is qualification overlooked in favor of maintaining gender ratios? • Does the even distribution of standard retail sales associates show further evidence of bias employment? • 47.7% male, 52.3% female • Does intentional gender balancing undermine the entire purpose of equal opportunity employment?

More Related