480 likes | 644 Views
AFM visualization of MutS Sliding Clamp Formation in DNA Mismatch Repair. Erie Group Zimeng Li 2012-5-30. Contents. DNA Mismatch Repair Sliding Clamp Formation AFM techniques in fluid Results Future To-dos. DNA Mismatch Repair. Sliding Clamp Formation. Tessmer , et.al (2008).
E N D
AFM visualization of MutS Sliding Clamp Formation in DNA Mismatch Repair Erie Group Zimeng Li 2012-5-30
Contents • DNA Mismatch Repair • Sliding Clamp Formation • AFM techniques in fluid • Results • Future To-dos
Sliding Clamp Formation Tessmer, et.al (2008)
Sliding Clamp Formation Qiu, et.al (2012)
Techniques • Myosin V walk/Nano robot spider walk • Super resolution microscopy (Yildiz(2003);Nils Walter) • AFM (Kodera(2010);Nils Walter) • FRET (Qiu(2012)) • ?
Atomic Force Microscopy • Fluid AFM techniques • Difference between thermal tune and cantilever tune • Substrates, special tips/treatment
DNA • Sample Buffer • APTES? • Rinse? • In Air? • Image Buffer • Tip
NiCl2 No APTES, No Rinse, No Air Dry
Contamination • Buffer – filter (twice) • Water - filter • Cantilever holder RMS: 220pm RMS: 37pm
New Substrate Construct RMS: 220pm RMS: 80 pm
Dirty Tips? DNA: 600pm, Background: 400pm, Dots: 6nm RMS: 500 pm RMS: 80 pm
Success ‘Probability’ Tip consumption: ~70, 30% gets DNA, 30% gets something real, 30% bad
Case Study • Resolution compare • Fast image capability • Buffer dependence • Injection • Evaluate operations
Resolution Improvement? Air Water
Tip is ‘hit’ so easily Phase Height
Fast Imaging Capability • Scan speed, scan points, integral gain, scan size; most importantly, tip’s health • 12s, 25s,50s
Conclusion: 150nm scan 10s: 100,10 20s: 200,10
Conclusion: 300nm scan 25s: 512,20 10s:100,10
Conclusion: 100nm scan 12s: 256,20 6s: 256,40
Conclusion: 1um scan 50s:512,10;256,5 25s:256,10
As time goes up, dirty things come out 8:09:06pm 10:11:33pm
Injection of MutS Before After
Working with salt buffer • How is DNA bound to mica? • Competition between Mg2+ and Na+
Hi-salt buffer Direct fluid imaging, 512,2.3
Hi-salt buffer • Indirect fluid imaging (i.e. dry first) • Initial: 120uL water+DNA • Injection: 120uL Hi-salt ->’lo-salt’ mixture • Evaporate: 120uL water • Eventually: 120uL Hi-salt+DNA
Hi-salt buffer injection Before After
After evaporation Before After
Lo-salt Buffer 9:45:20pm 9:55:27pm Indirect/direct fluid image: doesn’t move
Success ‘Probability’ Tip consumption: ~70, 30% gets DNA, 30% gets something real, 30% bad
Current Protocol • 15min • Running a full cleaning cycle • Deposition/No incubation • Rinse once (Twice results in no DNA?) • 15-30min/cycle • Image/No Good?/Change tips/Image/… • Average 2~3tips/sample
To-dos • Continue working with lo-salt buffer • If not working, try no-salt buffer • Adding NaCl to increase DNA mobility • Hi-salt – using APTES treated mica to reduce mobility • Does MutS work in water or no-salt buffer?