1 / 34

Environmental Remediation Sciences BERAC Meeting April 30, 2003

Environmental Remediation Sciences BERAC Meeting April 30, 2003. Teresa Fryberger Office of Biological and Environmental Research. Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER). Associate Director Ari Patrinos. Environmental Remediation Sciences Division Teresa Fryberger, Director.

fabiano-knight
Download Presentation

Environmental Remediation Sciences BERAC Meeting April 30, 2003

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Environmental Remediation SciencesBERAC Meeting April 30, 2003 Teresa Fryberger Office of Biological and Environmental Research

  2. Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER) Associate DirectorAri Patrinos Environmental Remediation Sciences Division Teresa Fryberger, Director Climate Change Research Division Jerry Elwood, Director Life Sciences Division Marv Frazier, Director Medical Sciences Division Michael Viola, Director

  3. Outline • Background—DOE cleanup problems • Environmental Sciences Division • Strategic Planning so far

  4. Environmental Management The DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) was created in 1989 to Address the environmental legacy from over 50 years of nuclear weapons research, production, and testing - some of the most technically challenging and complex work of any environmental program in the world

  5. Environmental Legacy: Nuclear Weapons Production SOURCE: Accumulation from 50 years of nuclear weapons production by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessors

  6. DOE Environmental Legacy

  7. DOE Environmental Legacy DOE Problem Wastes - Examples - 403,000 cubic meters of high level waste (HLW) - 250,000 cubic meters of solid transuranic wastes (TRU) - 4.4 million cubic meters of low level waste (LLW) • Non-radioactive hazardous wastes and mixed wastes • 5,000 – 7000 contaminated facilities

  8. DOE Environmental Legacy DOE Environmental Problems • 5,700+ individual plumes contaminating soil and groundwater • 7.8 Km2 plume at SRS • 18.1 Km2 plume of CCl4 at Hanford • 710,000 m3 of soil at NTS • 1.5 million m3 of soil at Fernald

  9. The Legacy Continues • More contamination and waste will be identified as characterization continues • Decontamination wastes??? • Secondary waste streams from clean-up operations • Long-term stewardship of sites where residual contamination remains

  10. Why Do We Need Basic Research for the Cleanup? • We have never done this before • To provide a technical basis for making decisions • To provide new approaches to cut costs, or sometimes just to provide approaches • To resolve technical problems as the cleanup progresses

  11. Hanford in the mid 1940s

  12. Hanford High Level Tank Wastes EXAMPLE • Single Shell Tanks • 149 tanks • 35M gallons of wastes • 190K tons of chemicals • 132M curies of radioactivity • 75% Sr-90, 24% Cs-137 • 65 “leakers” • Double Shell Tanks • 28 tanks • 20M gallons of wastes • 55K tons wastes • 82M curies of radioactivity • 72% Cs-137, 27% Sr-90

  13. High-Level Tank Wastes: how was it created? DOE Spent Fuel Reprocess Acid Waste “Neutralization” Underground Storage Tanks 403,000 m3 Sludge (Oxides, Hydroxides, Carbonates Sr, Cs,TRU) Saltcake and Supernate (Nitrates, Nitrites, Cs, Sr, Tc)

  14. Treatment of HLW Tanks LLW TRUs Cs,Sr,Tc Liquid Volume!!! Cost!!! Quality!!! Separate Cs,Sr, (Tc)? ? Alkaline High Level Waste Sludge 0.03% Radionuclides TRUs, Sr, Cs, Tc, Metals HLW Glass $1-2M/glass log

  15. Hanford High Level Waste Science issues: • Chemistry of high pH solutions to predict waste behavior • Tailored separations processes to • Cut costs • Reduce volume • Improve waste form performance • Designer materials for wasteforms • Improve performance • Reduce volume/costs • Remote characterization and online monitoring tools

  16. Hanford High Level Wastes 65 Known Leakers Subsurface Contaminants: Cesium Strontium Uranium Technetium Cyanides Chromium Cobalt Nitrates What happens during retrieval?? What does it mean to say “we’re done”??

  17. Understanding Contaminant Transport • Science issues: • Modeling/Prediction • Complexity • Scaling • Characterization/monitoring • In situ remediation/immobilization • Surficial Transport • Trophic Transfer

  18. Galvin Commission, 1995 “There is a particular need for long term, basic research in disciplines related to environmental cleanup … Adopting a science-based approach that includes supporting development of technologies and expertise … could lead to both reduced cleanup costs and smaller environmental impacts at existing sites and to the development of a scientific foundation for advances in environmental technologies.” From the 1995 Galvin Commission Report On the Department of Energy Laboratories

  19. Environmental Remediation Sciences Division

  20. Environmental Remediation Sciences Division • STAFF • Judy Nusbaum • Anna Palmisano • Paul Bayer • Roland Hirsch, Medical Applications Div. • Brendlyn Faison, Hampton University • Henry Shaw, LLNL • 3-4 new slots (hopefully)

  21. Environmental Remediation Sciences D. radiodurans reduces uranium R&D for solutions to DOE’s long-term environmental cleanup challenges The Environmental Management Science Program (EMSP) is developing the scientific basis for risk-based decision making and “breakthrough” approaches to cleaning up the nuclear weapons complex. Bioremediation Research (NABIR) provides the understanding of how microbes that naturally exist in soils can stabilize metals and radionuclides. Studies span the range of microbial genetics of all the way to field studies at actual contaminated sites. The Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL) is serving environmental users from around the world by providing the leading edge of computational and experimental capabilities for understanding processes at the molecular level. The Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (SREL)is studying the ecological impacts of remediation activities in real time at the Savannah River Site while providing hands-on educational programs at the Site. complexation ions with tetramethoxycalix[4]arene of cesium

  22. Environmental Remediation Sciences: FY03 Budget (thousands of $) NABIR $24,720 EMSP $29,900 EMSL $38,000 (operations) SREL $ 6,800 Misc. $10,100 Total $109,500 Minus ~12M for unfunded Congressional earmarks in FY03! Largest program of its kind anywhere!

  23. Strategic Planning for Environmental Remediation Sciences NRC Recommendation: “…that DOE develop a strategic vision for its Environmental Quality (EQ) R&D portfolio. This vision should provide the framework for developing the science and technology necessary to address EQ problems that extend beyond the present emphasis of short-term “compliance” and should incorporate the principal of continual improvement.” A Strategic Vision for DOE Environmental Quality R&D(National Academy Press, 2001)

  24. Strategic Planning • 2 Strategic Planning workshops (July and September, 2002) • Involved scientists from all relevant disciplines, other DOE offices, other agencies • Used NRC Reports on EM Science needs as a basis • Formation of BERAC Subcommittee • 1st meeting in April 2003 • Reviewed Strategic Plan Draft • Draft II is on its way!

  25. Environmental Remediation Sciences: Mission Enable scientific advances that help solve currently intractable environmental problems or otherwise provide break-through opportunities for DOE environmental missions, while also contributing to the general advance of the scientific fields involved.

  26. Environmental Remediation Sciences: Goals • Provide science to inform decisions about environmental remediation and stewardship • Advance scientific foundations that enable innovative remediation technologies and methodologies • Synthesize and integrate across disciplines to foster new scientific approaches that match the complexity of the problems

  27. ERSD Characteristics • Primary focus is on a subset of DOE-EM relevant issues • That are currently “intractable” • Where science can have the greatest impact • Highly interdisciplinary – integrates results from biology, geology, chemistry, ecology, etc. • Committed to developing and supporting a suite of field research sites • Develop a “toolbox” of characterization and monitoring tools.

  28. Environmental Remediation Sciences Program Emphasis • Improve our understanding of contaminant fate and transport by investigating and linking relevant processes • Focus on interdisciplinary hypothesis-driven field studies to address complexity, scaling, and validation of models and lab results • Understand nature’s tools for cleaning up the environment — harness the cleanup potential of microorganisms and geochemistry

  29. Environmental Remediation SciencesProgram Emphasis (continued) • Help develop the next generation of computational and experimental capabilities for understanding contaminant behavior • Provide the basis for new characterization and monitoring capabilities • Provide the basis for new separations and waste management options

  30. Collaborating/Coordinating • Interagency Steering Committee on Multimedia Environmental Modeling • National Science and Technology Council committees • Collaborations/Joint Research Calls with • EPA, NSF, NIEHS… • Other BER: Genomes to Life, Ecology, Microbial Genome • Other DOE: Environmental Management, Basic Energy Sciences, Advanced Scientific Computing, Yucca Mountain Project

  31. The Office of ScienceProgram Offices and Environmental Capabilities Director Raymond L. Orbach Principal Deputy Director James F. Decker Deputy Director for Operations Milton D. Johnson Chief of Staff Jeffrey T. Salmon Office of Basic Energy Sciences Associate Director Patricia M. Dehmer Office of High Energy and Nuclear Physics Associate Director S. Peter Rosen Office of Biological and Environmental Research Associate Director Aristides Patrinos Office of Fusion Energy Sciences Associate Director N. Anne Davies Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research Associate Director C. Edward Oliver Geosciences Heavy Element Chem. Analytical & Separations Chemistry User Facilities: synchrotron light sources, (nanoscience centers, neutron source) Climate Change Genomes to Life Microbial Research Ecology Bioremediation Low Dose Radiation EM Science Program User Facility: EMSL Computation Initiatives: Genomes to Life (Contaminant Flow and Transport)

  32. Programmatic Challenges • Integrating the science across the division programs • Fostering interdisciplinary research teams • Nurturing truly innovative ideas • Getting our science used

  33. Getting our science used • Work directly with cleanup staff at sites to identify and collaborate on the field research sites. • Work on specific site problems • Sponsor frequent technical exchange workshops with sites • Develop a strategy to “advertise” our successes.

  34. Opportunities • to “revolutionize” environmental studies—bringing much-needed rigor and the new tools of genomics, nanoscience, and computing to bear. • to have far-reaching impacts on the way environmental issues are approached. • to apply to a broader set of problems (e.g. water quality, future energy options, waste minimization, mining and industrial wastes)

More Related