1 / 48

Project X Reference Design Overview

Project X Reference Design Overview. Sergei Nagaitsev April 12, 2011. Reference Design. Reference Design Capabilities. 3 GeV CW superconducting H- linac with 1 mA average beam current. Flexible provision for variable beam structures to multiple users

fadhila
Download Presentation

Project X Reference Design Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project X Reference Design Overview Sergei Nagaitsev April 12, 2011

  2. Reference Design Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  3. Reference Design Capabilities • 3 GeV CW superconducting H- linac with 1 mA average beam current. • Flexible provision for variable beam structures to multiple users • CW at time scales >1 msec, 15% DF at <1 msec • Supports rare processes programs at 3 GeV • Provision for 1 GeV extraction for nuclear energy program • 3-8 GeV pulsed linac capable of delivering 300 kW at 8 GeV • Supports the neutrino program • Establishes a path toward a muon based facility • Upgrades to the Recycler and Main Injector to provide ≥ 2 MW to the neutrino production target at 60-120 GeV. • Day one experiment to be incorporated utilizing the CW linac • Utilization of a CW linac creates a facility that is unique in the world, with performance that cannot be matched in a synchrotron-based facility. Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  4. Reference DesignProvisional Siting CW Linac Pulsed 3-8 GeVLinac based on ILC / XFEL technology Pulsed Linac Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  5. Reference design: accelerator scope 5% duty cycle Pulsed dipole Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev Warm cw front end 162.5 MHz, 5 mA (H- ion source, RFQ, MEBT, chopper) 3-GeV cw SCRF linac (325, 650 MHz), 1-mA ave. beam current Transverse beam splitter for 3-GeV experiments 3-8 GeV: pulsed linac (5% duty cycle), 1.3 GHz Recycler and MI upgrades Various beam transport lines

  6. Changes to the reference design since Sep 2010 • Eliminated a 1.3-GHz section from the CW linac (Nov 2010) • Larger aperture, lower stripping losses, fewer cavities, cost neutral • Changed the RFQ frequency to 162.5 MHz (Jan 2011) • Easier chopper, lower RFQ power, larger aperture • Introduced a LEBT chopper (Nov 2010) • Ion source operates at a constant current, 5 mA max (Nov 2010) • Limit the max. cryo loss per cryomodule to 250 W (2K) (Nov 2010) • Per cavity – 25 W • Established pulsed 1.3 GHz linac configuration (Nov 2010) • 25 MV/m gradient • 1 mA beam current in 4.3 ms pulses • 1 Klystron per 16 cavities (2 CM) • 8 ms, 10 Hz Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  7. Linac beam current Beam to Recycler Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev Linac beam current has a periodic time structure (at 10 Hz) with two major components.

  8. Chopping for injection 162 MHz bunches to be removed Recycler RF • RF frequency at injection into the Recycler : ~50 MHz • Chopper needs to provide a kicker gap (~200 ns per 11 µs) and needs to remove bunches that fall into “wrong” phase of ring rf voltage. • 50% of bunches are removed ( ion source at 2 mA) • 80% of bunches are removed ( ion source at 5 mA) Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  9. Chopping and splitting for 3-GeV experiments 1 msec period at 3 GeV Muon pulses (16e7) 81.25 MHz, 100 nsec at 1 MHz700 kW Kaon pulses (16e7) 20.3 MHz 1540 kW Nuclear pulses (16e7) 10.15 MHz 770 kW Ion source and RFQ operate at 4.2 mA 75% of bunches are chopped at 2.5 MeV after RFQ Separation scheme Transverse rf splitter Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  10. Beam after splitter 1 MHz pulses 10 MHz bunches 20 MHz bunches Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  11. Ion source: TRIUMF-typeH- DC ion source Delivery expected: May 2011 LBNL + FNAL will test emittance etc. Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  12. Proposed LEBT configuration Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev LEBT will likely have a chopper to provide 0.5 ms gaps, needed for a switching magnet at 3 GeV

  13. RFQ (162.5 MHz) CW RFQ: Several design studies by LBNL Good experience at ANL and LBNL Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  14. MEBT design: 5 mA at 162.5 MHz beam 325 MHz warm bunching cavities =0.25 ∙μm; z,n=0.3 ∙μm Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  15. MEBT chopper Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  16. RT Bunching CW cavities Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  17. Effect of longitudinal emittance (L/=0.52) Bunch Length (3) vs. Synch. Phase MEBT SSR0 Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  18. Prelim Conclusions: Front End Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev • Transverse rms (norm) emittance 0.25 mm-mrad • Range of acceptable longitudinal emittances is close to equipartition, z/ ≈ 0.8-1.2, =0.25 ∙μm • No need for using 162.5 MHz cavity (copper) in MEBT. • SSR0 section at 325 MHz works for 162.5 MHz RFQ option • Unanswered issues: • Chopper driver • Beam absorber (10 kW) • Absorber sputtering and blistering rates

  19. SRF LinacTechnology Map Pulsed CW 650 MHz 0.16-3 GeV b=0.11 b=0.22 b=0.4 b=0.61 b=0.9 b=1.0 325 MHz 2.5-160 MeV 1.3 GHz 3-8 GeV Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  20. 325 MHz spoke cavity families SSR0 – design, prototyping SSR1 – prototyping, testing SSR2 - design Parameters of the single-spoke cavities Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  21. Focusing Periods in SSR sections: Focusing Period: SSR0: (sol+cav) = 610 mm SSR1: (sol+cav) = 800 mm SSR2: (sol+cav+cav+60 mm) = 1600 mm 800 mm Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  22. 650 cavities • 650 MHz, 5-cell cavity: • Similar length as for ILC-type cavity; • About the same maximal energy gain per cavity; • The same power requirements; • Benefits compared to 1.3 GHz ILC-type cavity: • Higher accelerating efficiency  smaller number of cavities and RF sources: • Beam dynamics • 2-fold frequency jump instead of 4-fold  easier transition • Smaller beam losses; • Less effect of cavity focusing (~1/ λ) • Trade-offs: • more serious problem with microphonics, but still may be manageable; • Larger diameter (comp to 1.3), higher cost per cavity; • additional rf frequency -> infrastructure. Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  23. 650 MHz cavities 650 MHz: β=0.61 650 MHz: β=0.9 Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  24. LE Cryomodules 3238.09 HE Cryomodules 8878.49 3282.03 11325.12 CMs lengths are shown from the first cavity iris to the last cavity iris. Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  25. 650 MHz Cryomodule(Tesla Style-Stand Alone, 250 W @ 2K) Vacuum Vessel Cold mass supports (2+1) Power MC (8) Beam End Plate Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  26. Cavity string & 300mm pipe Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  27. CW linac: Envelopes Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  28. Energy Gain per Cavity • Single cavity per power source • Solid State, IOT Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  29. 3 GeV CW LinacCryogenic Losses per Cavity ~42 kW cryogenic power at 4.5 K equivalent Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  30. Solenoid Magnetic Field Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  31. Quadrupole (doublet) Gradient Doublet (FD) 100 350 350 Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  32. Errors and misalignments • Misalignments ±1 mm for all elements (specification ±0.5 mm ) • RF jitter of 0.5 ° x 0.5 % in the front-end & 1 ° x 1% RF jitter in the high-energy part was implemented. • 100 seeds and 1 million macro-particles per seed. • 1 corrector, 1 BPM per solenoid/douplet/quad; BPM resolution=30 μm • Beam centroid is corrected to ±1mm; Emittance increase < 20%. • The uncorrected seeds predict losses above 100 W/m; corrected – no losses Beam Centroid off-set Beam Transverse Emittance The red curves are the 100 seeds without correction and the blue curves are the 100 seeds corrected Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  33. H- stripping Summary Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev • Stripping on residual gas is < 0.1 W/m if pressure is better than 10-8 Torr • Assuming gas contains 50% H2, 25% O2, 25% N2 • Magnetic stripping is well below 0.1 W/m even for unrealistic 5 mm beam offset. • Stripping on blackbody radiation is not an issue for SC linac. • Intra-beam stripping is ~0.1 W/m

  34. 3 – 8 GeV acceleration Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev • Pulsed linac based on the ILC technology • 1.3 GHz, 25 MV/m gradient, ≤5% duty cycle • considering 8-30 ms pulse length • ~250 cavities (28 ILC-type cryomodules) needed. • Simple FODO lattice • 1 Klystron per 2 CM’s

  35. Cavity Energy Gain Eacc = 25 MV/m: L=1.038m Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  36. Envelopes (sigma) Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  37. Summary of studies for pulsed linac Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev • Beam losses are smaller than for CW linac • Intra-beam stripping is well below 0.1 W/m • Magnetic stripping is small for reasonable beam displacement (<20mm) • LLRF control • Simulated for scheme with 1 klystron feed 2 CM • VS control at the level below~0.5 % and 0.5 deg (individual cavity error ~10% and 10 deg) allows to keep energy jitter at 8 GeV below 10 MeV. (needed for injection)

  38. Injection Need to accumulate 26 mA-ms protons in the MI/Recycler For a stationary foil, a single 26-ms pulse would destroy the foil. 6 pulses at 10 Hz give enough time for radiative cooling between pulses Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  39. Foil efficiency Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  40. Recycler injection Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  41. Alternative injection scheme • A possibility to inject in a single 26-ms pulse is highly desirable. • Eliminates the need for Recycler (as an accumulator) • Potentially allows for a lower linac energy (6-7 GeV) • Requires long-pulse linac operation Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  42. Recycler parameters Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  43. Phase-space painting Motivation • Gaussian beam G =3 • Single RF harmonic at 53 MHz B =5 DQ= -0.3 • Uniform beam G =1 • Longitudinal painting B =2 DQ= -0.04 Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  44. Longitudinal painting 162 MHz bunches to be removed Recycler RF B=2.2 Linac long. emittance: 1.3e-4 eV-s Recycler long. emittance: 0.6 eV-s Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  45. Transverse painting • Transverse painting is designed to: • Minimize the number of secondary passages and foil heating • To make correlated x-y painting (K-V distribution) with radius increase for each next pulse • Injected beam does not move on foil • Closed orbit describes almost a quarter of circle (forward and back) Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  46. Recycler modifications • New rf systems: • 53 MHz and 106 MHz (fixed frequency) • New injection system • Possibly TiN vacuum pipe coating to mitigate electron cloud Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  47. MI modifications • New RF systems • 53 MHz and 106 MHz (with freq. sweep for acceleration) • 2.7 MV/turn at 36-degree synch phase • γtjump system • Possibly TiN vacuum pipe coating to mitigate electron cloud Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

  48. Summary • Project X design concept is well developed and has been stable for more than 1 year. • We have an RD&D plan to take us through CD2. Key R&D issues (among others) • Chopper section • Recycler injection • SRF cavities Apr 12, 2011 - S. Nagaitsev

More Related