1 / 25

Benchmarking in European Higher Education

Benchmarking in European Higher Education. Dr. Christiane Gaehtgens ESMU Senior Expert. ESMU: European Centre for Strategic Management of Universities. International non-profit organisation promoting Good Practice: Networks: HUMANE, DEAN, MODERN, EDUPROF Seminars and Training Programmes

fahim
Download Presentation

Benchmarking in European Higher Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Benchmarking in European Higher Education Dr. Christiane Gaehtgens ESMU Senior Expert

  2. ESMU: European Centre for Strategic Management of Universities • International non-profit organisation promoting Good Practice: • Networks: HUMANE, DEAN, MODERN, EDUPROF • Seminars and Training Programmes • Benchmarking • Past activity -Technical assistance to EC (management of major HE programmes : COMETT, 1987-1995 & SOCRATES, LEONARDO, YOUTH for Europe III, 1995-2006) • President: Professor Frans van Vught, University of Twente, NL • Secretary General: Nadine Burquel, Headoffice in Brussels

  3. EBI-I:2006-2008 • Objectives: • understanding the concepts & practices of benchmarking • improving and increasing its use in higher education • Methodology • Desk research: analysis of 18 collaborative benchmarking projects in higher education • Three specialised practical workshops on benchmarking research, internationalisation and internal quality • Symposium, presenting preliminary project findings

  4. Outputs First Phase: • An online tool with examples, advice and an online bibliography • A practical handbook with a review of the literature and a step by step approach to benchmarking • A report of extensive desk research carried out on benchmarking in higher education • Guidelines of good practices for effective benchmarking

  5. EBI-II: 2008-2010 • Four benchmarking groups: • Governance • University-enterprise cooperation • Curriculum reforms • Lifelong learning • A broad online collaborative learning community • Benchmarking tools (questionnaires, reports, handbooks of GPs) • Conferences – Dissemination of results

  6. 2. Recent Challenges for European HEIs • Internationalisation/Globalisation • Cost and specialisation of research (human resources) • Reputation Race • Size matters (increasingly) • Supranational European integration policy • Teaching and learning: EHEI • Research structures, funding mechanisms: ERA,EIT, FPs • Modernisation Agenda: • Acknowledgement for diversity of mission • Institutional autonomy (responsibility) • Accountability • Stakeholder involvement • Growing Diversity of Profile and Mission • Accountability to stakeholders

  7. 4. What is Benchmarking? • Not invented here” : The Quality movement started in the private sector, namely in Japan after WW II. • Reluctantly, then enthusiastically excepted in the West. • Two major types: • Continuous monitoring (TQM) • Products and Processes (ISO 9000 etc.) • Benchmarking provides qualified, targeted information for strategic decisions through comparison of key performance indicators with strategically relevant partner institutions.

  8. 4. What is Benchmarking (2) • Benchmarking provides standards for institutional quality management/enhancement. • Benchmarking is a means for inter-organisational learning. • Benchmarking can be carried out within a peer-group, on a one-to-one basis or against a database. • Benchmarking brings together the benefits of cooperation and competition. • Benchmarking is a internal governance tool, not an external assessment or ranking.

  9. In other words: Benchmarking empowers HEIs to- • Measure and compare performance to the competition • Self-assess their performance in selected areas • Better understand processes • Support strategy formulation and implementation • Strengthen institutional identity • Set targets for improvement • Obtain data for decision making • Share good practice, learn from others how to improve • Respond to national and international performance standards • Be accountable to stakeholders • Set new standards for the sector.

  10. Ranking Benchmarking recognises institutional diversity „Golden Delicious and Granny Smith“ university-owned flexible (customising) competition and cooperation governance tool • mono-dimensional, „one size fits all“ approach • comparing „apples and oranges“ • externally owned, public • rigid • competition • main impact on reputation

  11. 5.1.Benchmarking Methodology: Approaches • Benchmarking approaches differ considerably: • Inter-/ Intra-organisational learning • Benchmarking Partnerships (several universities) • One-to-One Benchmarking • Benchmarking against database • Qualitative or quantitative

  12. 5.2. Benchmarking Methodology: Cornerstones to start with • Ensure validity • Choose research based method • Subscribe to rigid standards • Agree on chiefly quantitative • Be flexible and realistic • Decide on method and modules for individualised approaches • Pragmatic step-by-step approach • Ensure autonomy and confidentiality • Data and outcomes university/partnership-owned

  13. 6. Benchmarking Terminology • Priority (Domain):Strategically relevant area in which benchmarking takes place • e.g. the learning experience, research performance, administration, staff develoment • Indicators: Aspects/areas within the priority for which data can/should be gathered: • Input – processes – output – impact • Benchmark: level of performance per indicator • Standards can be categories (high/middle/low) or absolute numbers/percentages • to be defined by group during the benchmarking exercise

  14. More Benchmarking Terminology… • Benchmark: measurablelevel of performance per indicator an institution aims to achieve, relates on targets • Will be envisaged before benchmarking starts • Intended wo be revised or confirmed after the benchmarking exercise has been completed • Criteria: relevant aspect of indicators in which data are to be gathered and compared • To be determined on the basis of expertise and good-practice exchange • External experts should be involved for maximum relevance • Availability of data is crucial • Action plan: operational strategy for implementation of performance level based on findings of benchmarking exercise

  15. 7. Benchmarking Step-by-Step • First and foremost: • As Benchmarking is chiefly a governance tool, the choice of benchmarking approach should be determined by the overall strategic goals of each individual HEI. • Ownership of and responsibility for the benchmarking exercise lies solely with the management of participating university. • Be realistic for credibility: check feasibility, e.g. availability of data and resources, ensure stakeholder support.

  16. Step I: Developing a Strategy • Take responsibility at Senior Management level • Identify purpose, goals  and perspectives for the benchmarking exercise, taking into account institutional mission • Clearly define area(s) of benchmarking (priorities, domains) • Identify benchmarking method / partners  (here: through ESMU) • Choose approach (based on strategic goals and feasibility, e.g. availability of data, timeframe) • Communicate to internal and external stakeholders, gain commitment • Provide resources (staff, funding) • Create benchmarking team, allocate responsibilities • Formal agreement with benchmarking partners

  17. Step II: Gathering Information • Confirm availibility of data • Choose indicators (balance strategic goals and feasibility) • Define criteria (with help from external experts) • Set benchmarks (absolute or steps) • Gather data • Compare outcomes • Confirm/review targets

  18. priorities  indicators

  19. indicators  criteria  benchmarks

  20. Step III: Introducing ChangeAction Plan: Role of Senior Management • Define goals and targets, based on benchmarks, immediate, mid- and long-term • Communicate, gain committment • Provide appropriate resources for the change process to take place effectively (Task Force, infrastructure) • Supervise process/set milestones • Ensure implementation of actions • Monitor change in performance

  21. Step III Action Plan: Role of Task Force • Design framework and precise, step-by-step action plan to convert the results of benchmarking into institutional change • Design structured process with milestones and deadline • Report progress and obstacles to Senior Management • Improve database for future monioring

  22. Step IV: Assessment • Optional: • Evaluation of benchmarking experience • Evaluation of action/change process • Good practice exchange with benchmarking partners • …start all over again!

  23. … for Quality Enhancement is a never-ending challenge, and so is Benchmarking…

  24. Save the Date(s): • Benchmarking Workshop Brussels 10 June, 2010 • EBI-II Dissemination Conference Brussels 11 June, 2010

More Related