120 likes | 258 Views
NAPHSIS 2007 Salt Lake City. Oregon’s Experience with EDR Biometrics Michael Day, MPA Communications Coordinator Oregon Vital Events Registration System Center for Health Statistics Department of Human Services. The NAPHSIS/NCHS Collaboration Past Successes and Future Challenges
E N D
NAPHSIS 2007Salt Lake City Oregon’s Experience withEDR Biometrics Michael Day, MPA Communications CoordinatorOregon Vital Events Registration SystemCenter for Health StatisticsDepartment of Human Services The NAPHSIS/NCHS Collaboration Past Successes and Future Challenges Salt Lake City, UT June 3rd – 7th, 2007
Introduction to Biometrics • Genuine two-factor authentication combines: • Something you know – login/password • Something you are – fingerprint • Oregon uses the APC Biopod: The NAPHSIS/NCHS Collaboration Past Successes and Future Challenges Salt Lake City, UT June 3rd – 7th, 2007
Device Installation • USB Connection • We provide a disk containing necessary software • Device driver • Microsoft .NET Framework • Vendor program to adjust security settings • Support tech during rollout The NAPHSIS/NCHS Collaboration Past Successes and Future Challenges Salt Lake City, UT June 3rd – 7th, 2007
Biometric Signing Example – Fails: The NAPHSIS/NCHS Collaboration Past Successes and Future Challenges Salt Lake City, UT June 3rd – 7th, 2007
Biometric Signing Animation Example – Fails: The NAPHSIS/NCHS Collaboration Past Successes and Future Challenges Salt Lake City, UT June 3rd – 7th, 2007
Biometric Signing Animation Example – Successful: The NAPHSIS/NCHS Collaboration Past Successes and Future Challenges Salt Lake City, UT June 3rd – 7th, 2007
Overall Experience • Users largely accepting • “Cool” “Fun” “Easy” • Sometimes frustrating • Takes some practice for consistent finger placement • Requires all “I’s dotted and T’s crossed” before it will authenticate The NAPHSIS/NCHS Collaboration Past Successes and Future Challenges Salt Lake City, UT June 3rd – 7th, 2007
Concerns: Security • System creates templates using pattern matching • Reference template created and stored during initial enrollment • Match template created when signing record • Compare the two to authenticate The NAPHSIS/NCHS Collaboration Past Successes and Future Challenges Salt Lake City, UT June 3rd – 7th, 2007
Concerns: Security • Template security is the critical factor • Template is created using a hash function • Hash function is a formula used to turn fingerprint pattern into numeric data • One-way process • “Chops and mixes” original data • Further encrypted – AES 256-bit • Only encrypted hash value is transmitted/stored, not fingerprint pattern The NAPHSIS/NCHS Collaboration Past Successes and Future Challenges Salt Lake City, UT June 3rd – 7th, 2007
Concerns: Distrust • Some resistance to fingerprint storage • “Big brother” has their fingerprints? • Loss of privacy • How to address concerns • Biometric security white paper • Positive experience of other users • Increased use of fingerprints elsewhere The NAPHSIS/NCHS Collaboration Past Successes and Future Challenges Salt Lake City, UT June 3rd – 7th, 2007
Other Experiences • Co-exists with other biometric devices • Device can be used for other biometric functions The NAPHSIS/NCHS Collaboration Past Successes and Future Challenges Salt Lake City, UT June 3rd – 7th, 2007
Additional Information • General information: • Mike Day, Communications Coordinator • michael.r.day@state.or.us • 971-673-1196 • Technical questions: • Sandra Sams, Technical Lead • sandra.sams@state.or.us • 971-673-0579 • www.oregon.gov/DHS/ph/OVERS/ The NAPHSIS/NCHS Collaboration Past Successes and Future Challenges Salt Lake City, UT June 3rd – 7th, 2007