1.06k likes | 2.05k Views
Principles of Antiretroviral Therapy . Christopher Behrens, MD Northwest AIDS Education & Training Center University of Washington. CBB/2002. Current Treatment Strategies. DHHS Guidelines regarding when to initiate antiretroviral therapy Adherence Strategic antiretroviral combinations
E N D
Principles of Antiretroviral Therapy Christopher Behrens, MD Northwest AIDS Education & Training Center University of Washington CBB/2002
Current Treatment Strategies • DHHS Guidelines regarding when to initiate antiretroviral therapy • Adherence • Strategic antiretroviral combinations • Popular regimens • Follow-up monitoring CBB/2002
HIV: Case History • A 29-year old woman comes to the clinic for routine HIV care; she has been HIV-infected for about 4 years, and has never received antiretroviral treatment. Her most recent CD4 count is 330 and her viral load is 88,000. • You explain the meaning of her CD4 count and viral load • She asks you if you would recommend antiretroviral therapy CBB/2002
Advantages decrease viral load, increase CD4 count prevent further damage to immune system immune reconstitution reduced morbidity & mortality (if effective) prevent viral heterogeneity decrease infectivity Disadvantages toxicities, both short- & long-term pill burden, lifestyle changes potential for developing resistance may limit future options potential for transmission of resistant virus cost Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy CBB/2002
Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy: Key Considerations • Symptoms & Opportunistic Infections • CD4 count • Viral Load • Anticipated Adherence - patient ‘readiness’ CBB/2002
Indications for Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV DHHS Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents, February 5, 2001, Table 6. CBB/2002
Indications for Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV DHHS Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents, February 5, 2001, Table 6. CBB/2002
Baseline CD4 Count and Survival after initation of HAART: prospective cohort of 715 patients 1.0 0.5 CD4 Count when Initiate HAART proportion surviving < 50 51 - 200 201 - 350 > 350 0.0 1 3 4 5 0 2 Survival in Years Chen RY et al, 8th CROI, Chicago 2001
Cumulative Mortality by Baseline CD4 Count Baseline CD4 Count and Survival after Initiation of HAART CD4> 200 ==================== CD4 50-199 Probability of Survival (%) N = 1219 therapy- naïve individuals initiating HAART in British Columbia 1996 - 1999 CD4 < 50 Time From Start of HAART (months) JAMA. 2001;286:2568-2577 CBB/2002
Indications for Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV DHHS Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents, February 5, 2001, Table 6. CBB/2002
Survival after Initiation of HAART by Baseline CD4 Count and Viral Load =================== Probability of Survival (%) N = 1219 therapy- naïve individuals initiating HAART in British Columbia 1996 - 1999 JAMA. 2001;286:2568-2577 Time from initation of HAART (mos)
Impact of CD4 and Viral Load on Initiation of HAART: Summary • The optimal time to initiate therapy is: • unclear • before CD4 drops below 200 • probably when CD4 between 200 and 350 • determined more by CD4 count than viral load • Viral Load • predicts the slope of CD4 decline • may help determine whether to start closer to CD4 count of 200 or 350 CBB/2002
HIV: Case History • A 29-year old woman comes to the clinic for routine HIV care; she has been HIV-infected for about 4 years, and has never received antiretroviral treatment. Her most recent CD4 count is 330 and her viral load is 88,000. • Would you suggest she start antiretroviral therapy? CBB/2002
Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy: Key Considerations • Symptoms & Opportunistic Infections • CD4 count • Viral Load • Anticipated Adherence - patient ‘readiness’ CBB/2002
Adherence “Drugs don’t work if people don’t take them.” - C. Everett Koop CBB/2002
Virologic Control falls sharply with diminished adherence Patients with HIV RNA<400 copies/mL, % PI adherence, % (electronic bottle caps) Paterson, et al. 6th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 1999; Chicago, IL. Abstract 92. CBB/2002
Adherence O 90–100% O50–89% O 0–49% Adherence and AIDS-Free Survival 10% Adherence difference = 21% reduction in risk of AIDS 1.00 0.75 Proportion AIDS-Free 0.50 0.25 P = .0012 0.00 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Months from entry Bangsberg D, et al. AIDS. 2001:15:1181
Reasons for Non-Adherence: Clinician vs Patient Views Chesney M. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy. 12th World AIDS Conference, 1998; Geneva. Lecture 281 CBB/2002
Predictors of Poor Adherence • active alcohol1 or substance2 abuse • work outside the home for pay1 • depressed mood1 • lack of perceived efficacy of HAART3 • lack of advanced disease4 • concern over side effects4 1. Chesney MA. 37th ICAAC, 1997; Toronto. Abstract 281. 2. Cheever LW, Curr Infect Dis Rep 1999 Oct;1(4):401-407. 3. Horne R, et al. 39th ICAAC, 1999; San Francisco. Abstract 588. 4. Wenger N, et al. 6th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, 1999; Chicago. Abstract 98. CBB/2002
Predictors of Poor Adherence, continued • inability to fit medications into daily schedule • tid dosing, food requirements1 1. Stone VE, et al. JAIDS 2001; 28:124-131 CBB/2002
Factors Associated with Higher Levels of Adherence • twice-daily or once-daily regimens1,4 • belief in own ability to adhere to regimen1 • not living alone2 • dependent on a significant other for support2 • history of Opportunistic Infection or Advanced HIV disease3 1. Eldred L, et al, J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1998;18:117-125. 2. Morse EV et al, Soc Sci Med 1991;32:1161-1167. 3. Singh N, et al, AIDS Care 1996;8:261-269. 4. Stone VE, et al. JAIDS 2001; 28:124-131 CBB/2002
Factors Associated with Higher Levels of Adherence • Belief in efficacy of antiretroviral therapy • Belief that non-adherence will lead to viral resistance Wenger N, et al. 6th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, 1999; Chicago. Abstract 98.
Interventions Shown to Improve Adherence to Antiretrovirals • medication alarms1 • education & counseling sessions2,3 • Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)4,5 1. Samet JH, et al. Am J Med. 1992;92:495-502. 2. Malow RW, et al. Alcohol Drug Abuse 1998;49:1021-4. 3. Tuldra A, et al. 39th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 1999; Abstract 595. 4. Sorensen JL, et al. AIDS Care. 1998;10:297-312. 5. Wall TL, et al. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995;37:261-269.
Self-Adminstered vs Directly Observed Therapy During Incarceration N = 50 in each group p < 0.01 Fischl et al 8th CROI, 2001 abstract 528
Putting it all Together Practical Strategies to Improve Adherence
Improving Adherence: before Initiation of Therapy • Assess patient's understanding and acceptance of the regimens • Determine other medical barriers to adherence • Manage or refer for management of adherence-limiting co-morbid conditions Adapted from: Miller et al., The AIDS Reader 10(3):177-185, 2000.
Improving Adherence: before Initiation of Therapy • Try to use simple regimens • bid or better • avoid food requirements if possible • Clear & simple instructions • Negotiated treatment plan
Improving Adherence: After Initiation of Therapy • Close follow-up • Ask patient to verbalize treatment regimen • Education about adherence • re-emphasize importance of adherence at each visit, even in patients with good virologic control • review incidence & management of adverse effects often
Improving Adherence: After Initiation of Therapy • consider cues to remind patients of dosing • other reminders: alarms, watches, pagers • consider recruiting family/friends as support • referral to community support groups • involve other members of the health care team Adapted from: Miller et al., The AIDS Reader 10(3):177-185, 2000.
Back to the case • You confirm her viral load and CD4 count; she keeps her follow-up appointments and appears to understand the importance of adherence. She has no significant co-morbid conditions or medications. • What regimen would you recommend?
Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) • Combination of at least 3 drugs, usually: • 2 NRTIs (the “NRTI backbone”), plus: • 1 NNRTI or 1-2 PIs • Therapy with only one or two agents allows HIV to overcome therapy through resistance mutations
Classes of Antiretroviral Agents Nucleoside Analogues HIV RT RNA DNA Nucleus Host Cell Non-Nucleosides Protease Inhibitors Adapted from: Walker B. IDSA 1998
Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs) • Nucleoside analogues that block translation of HIV RNA into DNA by inhibiting HIV Reverse Transcriptase enzyme • AZT (zidovudine; Retrovir) • 3TC (lamivudine; Epivir) • d4T (stavudine; Zerit) • ddI (didanosine; Videx) • Abacavir (Ziagen) • ddC (zalcitabine; Hivid)
Tenofovir: a new NRTI • Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor • one 300mg tablet daily with food • well-tolerated and effective in clinical trials to date • effective against many strains of HIV with NRTI resistance • also active against hepatitis B • generally being reserved for salvage therapy
Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTIs) • Also inhibit HIV Reverse Transcriptase, but at a different site than NRTIs • Efavirenz (Sustiva) • Nevirapine (Viramune) • Delavirdine (Rescriptor)
Protease Inhibitors (PIs) • Block release of the assembled HIV virus particles from infected cells • Ritonavir (Norvir) • Saquinavir (Fortavase; Invirase) • Nelfinavir (Viracept) • Indinavir (Crixivan) • Amprenavir (Agenerase) • Lopinavir (co-formulated w/ ritonavir as Kaletra)
Ritonavir intensification of other Protease Inhibitors (PIs) • Protease Inhibitors, like many medications, are metabolized in the liver by the cytochrome P450 enzyme complex • Ritonavir inhibits this complex, thereby boosting serum levels of co-administered protease inhibitors
Basic Pharmacology Principles Cmax Drug Level Cmax Cmin IC90 Area of Potential HIV Replication IC50 Cmin Dosing Interval Time Dose Dose
An Example of Ritonavir Boosting:Indinavir/Ritonavir BID PK Study 10,000 IDV/RTV q12h: 800/200 High-fat Meal 800/100 High-fat Meal 400/400 High-fat Meal IDV q8h: 800 mg Fasted IndinavirPlasmaConcentration(nM) 1,000 100 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Time Postdose (hours) 6th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 1999. Abstract 362.
Ritonavir intensification of other Protease Inhibitors (PIs) • This can be used to ease pill burden, dosing intervals, and potentially overcome HIV resistance among protease inhibitors • This can also lead to potentially dangerous or fatal interactions with other medications and recreational drugs
So What to Start With? • PI - based regimens (2 NRTIs + 1-2 PIs) • NNRTI - based regimens (2 NRTIs + 1 NNRTI) • NRTI - based regimens (3 NRTIs)
The most clinical outcome data available for PI-based regimens Allow deferral of NNRTIs High genetic barrier to resistance (multiple mutations required) high pharmacologic barrier to resistance for pharmaco-kinetically boosted PIs Short-term side effects (esp. gastrointestinal) Long-term metabolic/morphologic side effects Inconvenience & adherence (schedule, pill burden, food requirements) Drug-drug interactions Protease Inhibitor -based regimens Disadvantages Advantages
Simpler regimens Fewer long-term toxicities Potent at high viral loads/low CD4+ cell counts (efavirenz) Allow deferral of PIs Fewer drug-drug interactions NNRTIs vary in potency; some may be less effective at high viral loads/low CD4+ counts (nevirapine, delavirdine) Low genetic barrier to resistance Extensive NNRTI cross-resistance toxicities: CNS, hyperlipidemia (efavirenz); rash (all); hepatotoxicity (NVP > EFV) NNRTI - based regimens Disadvantages Advantages
Allows deferral of PIs and NNRTIs Simple, low pill burden Well tolerated minimal long-term toxicity virtually no drug interactions Limited data, no clinical endpoint data Relative potency and durability not established Efficacy at high viral loads questionable Abacavir hypersensitivity NRTI - based regimens(AZT + 3TC + Abacavir) Advantages Disadvantages
Recommended Antiretroviral Combinations for Initial Therapy Choose one from Column A and one from Column B DHHS Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents, August 13, 2001, Table 12.
Inverse Association Nelfinavir Indinavir Nevirapine Delavirdine triple NRTI No Association Efavirenz Lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra) Unknown Association dual PI combination Effect of Baseline Viral Load on Efficacy
VL > 100,000 Proven LPV/RTV + 2 NRTIs Efavirenz + 2 NRTIs Unproven Boosted PI + 2 NRTIs 3 NRTIs + PI 3 NRTIs + Nevirapine NRTI/NNRTI/PI VL < 100,000 LPV/RTV + 2 NRTIs Efavirenz + 2 NRTIs Nevirapine + 2 NRTIs 1-2 PIs + 2 NRTIs AZT/3TC/Abacavir Choice of initial regimen by baseline Viral Load
Popular Initial HAART Regimens: Efavirenz + 2 NRTIs • d4T/3TC/Efavirenz • highly potent • generally well tolerated • CNS side effects from efavirenz • AZT/3TC/Efavirenz (or Combivir/Efavirenz) • low pill burden • more side effects from AZT