300 likes | 505 Views
CME Mythology: Do Global CMEs or Sympathetic CMEs Exist?. International Solar Cycle Studies 2001 (ISCS), June 13-16, 2001 Longmont, Colorado. Rainer Schwenn Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau. Halo CMEs: a new quality from SOHO.
E N D
CME Mythology: Do Global CMEs or Sympathetic CMEs Exist? International Solar Cycle Studies 2001 (ISCS), June 13-16, 2001 Longmont, Colorado Rainer Schwenn Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau
Halo CMEs: a new quality from SOHO A classical “halo” CME, observed by LASCO-C2 on 4.11.1998 Towards or away from Earth? That knowledge would grant space weather predictions a new quality
Front or backside: a new quality from SOHO A pressure wave (EIT Wave) in the solar atmosphere, pushed by a flare on 7.4.1997. A halo CME was launched towards Earth that caused a geomagnetic storm on 10.4.97.
This CME began as a “global” CME, i.e. in two parts simultaneously on both limbs. Later, the envelope turned into a full halo. Note: the source “axis” was about parallel to the lobes’ axis
Another apparent halo CME, also from two parts on opposite limbs This was the obvious source, on the front side. The bright flash occurred at 05:58 UT, and the axes were parallel. However…
Morale: better look twice, in particular if you are about to create a myth… …close inspection of C2 images proves: the east limb event started more than one hour ahead of time! An independent backside source?
The typical “global” CME? No: two lobes contained in one single halo CME, a “split halo”
The same event: the source axis was perpendicular to the lobes’ axis!
No “global “ event, just two lobes contained in a halo CME, a backside event by the way
Another split halo CME, “butterfly type”
In this “butterfly type” halo CME, the axis was about 450 off
2 lobes under a common halo envelope. The source was oriented almost parallel to the lobes’ axis.
The source axis is perpendicular to the lobes’ axis
One more example: a “butterfly-type” halo CME, on the backside
Close relatives of “global” CMEs: Cannibals! Gopalswamy, 2000 A halo CME, “cannibalizing” a limb CME
Close relatives of “global” CMEs: Cannibals! Gopalswamy, 2000 A halo CME, “cannibalizing” a limb CME Note: the “light bulb” CME had occurred behind the limb
Close relatives of “global” CMEs: Cannibals! Gopalswamy, 2000 2 succeeding halo CMEs, “cannibalizing” a limb CME
Other suspects in context with global CMEs: magnetic chains Chertok, 1997 ff Suggestion: “…the chains are visible manifestations of separators or quasi-separatrix layers formed between different interacting large-scale magnetic flux systems in the evolving global magnetic solar atmosphere”
Alternative explanation of “global” CMEs: new perspective on flux ropes Sketch showing the possible large-scale topology of a flux-rope magnetic cloud Bothmer and Schwenn, 1998
Alternative explanation of “global” CMEs: new perspective on flux ropes Chen et al., 1993 ff Erupting flux rope with its legs connected to the sun
Chen et al., 2000 This CME (on September 9th, 1997) was well observed by the Mark 3 and LASCO coronagraphs. It fits well to the erupting flux rope model
Chen et al., 2000 This is what the flux rope model would predict how this CME should look like
Different perspectives of flux rope CMEs 1. A typical flux rope CME seen from the side, I.e. above one limb
2. An extended flux rope CME seen from the front or back side. Note the 2D rope structure and the engulfing 3D halo CME structure. “Global” CMEs: a projection effect!
“Global” CMEs: a projection effect!
CME Mythology: Do Global CMEs or Sympathetic CMEs Exist? My answer is: No. They are probably just head-on (or head off…?) flux rope halo CMEs. Let’s see what they look like from different perspectives, i.e., STEREO and Solar Orbiter. STAY TUNED! Rainer Schwenn Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau