150 likes | 348 Views
Hearings on Separation of Powers and Legislative Oversight. Presentation: Gary Ciminero, Rhode Island House Policy Office Before the House Committee on Separation of Powers April 21, 2004. Today’s agenda. Separation of Powers and Legislative Oversight
E N D
Hearings on Separation of Powers and Legislative Oversight Presentation: Gary Ciminero, Rhode Island House Policy Office Before the House Committee on Separation of Powers April 21, 2004
Today’s agenda Separation of Powers and Legislative Oversight • Reply to Requests for Information Posed at Earlier Committee Hearings—Gary Ciminero, Rhode Island House Policy Office • Presentation on Legislative Oversight: Evaluation of Program Performance—Kate Wade, Program Evaluation Director, Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau
Legislative Oversight Reply to Requests for Additional Information— Posed at the 3/10/04 Hearing Gary Ciminero Rhode Island House Policy Office
Reply to Requests for Additional Information—Correction of RI Staff Count Data • Recall that at the prior hearing of 3/10, rankings from NCSL were based on total full-time staff per legislator by state. • Rhode Island’s data was as-of 3/03, at 297 Legislative Staffers • This meant that Rhode Island Ranked 23rd at 2.63 total legislative staffers per legislator
Reply to Requests for Additional Information—Correction of RI Staff Count Data • Updated/corrected data as of October 2003 for Rhode Island has the staff count at 278.4 FTEs. • Data as of October, compiled by the RI-DOA corrects for staff reductions, at the request of GA leadership and a corrected number of part-timers • These changes reduce the total by about 19 FTEs • On this basis, Rhode Island has a Staff/Legislator ratio of 2.46—Lowering our relative staff size to 25th nationally. (See updated chart on next page.)
Legislative Oversight Capacity—2003 Full-Time Staff per Legislator
Reply to Requests for Additional Information—Representative Paul W. Crowley (continued) INFORMATION on PROFESSIONAL STAFF COMPARISONS ACROSS STATES • NCSL also has data on Professional Legislative Staff by State—see next slide • On this fairer basis, Rhode Island ranks even better—with just 103.5 professional staffers it has • Just 1.01 Professional Staffer per Legislator • Ranking us 30th among the states in relative staffing
Legislative Oversight Capacity—2003 Full-Time Professional Staff per Legislator
Reply to Requests for Additional Information—Representative Paul W. Crowley (continued) INFORMATION on PROFESSIONAL STAFF COMPARISONS--continued • Based on a better measure, Full-time professional staff per bill enacted—with 518 bills enacted in RI in 2002 (see next slide): • We had just 0.22 professional staffers per bill • Ranking us 39th, one of the lowest relative staffing levels compared with other states.
Legislative Oversight Capacity—2003 Full-Time Professional Staff per Bill Passed
Reply to Requests for Additional Information—Representative Paul W. Crowley (concluded) INFORMATION on PROFESSIONAL STAFF COMPARISONS--concluded Based on another measure that gives better scope to the amount of work needing to be done by Legislative Professional Staff—we looked at the total number of bills introduced: • With 2767 bills introduced in RI in 2002: • We have has just 0.04 professional staffers per introduced bill • Ranking us 47th, for about the lowest relative staffing level compared with other states.
Reply to Requests for Additional Information—Representative Nicholas Gorham INFORMATION on PROFESSIONAL STAFF COMPARISONS with State Populations • BASED ON THE (FLAWED) METRIC OF FULL-TIME STAFF PER CAPITA, RI RANKS 2ND • BASED ON A SOMEWHAT FAIRER (YET FLAWED) METRIC OF FULL-TIME PROFESSIONAL STAFF PER CAPITA, RI RANKS 7TH AMONG THE STATES—see next slide.
Legislative Oversight Capacity—2003 Full-Time Professional Staff per Capita
Reply to Requests for Additional Information—Representative Nicholas Gorham (continued) HOWEVER, COMPARISONS WITH POPULATION SIZE DISTORT ANY CONCLUSION ABOUT STAFFING LEVELS • SINCE POPULATION IS A POOR MEASURE OF THE AMOUNT OF LEGISLATIVE ANALYSIS AND OVERSIGHT REQUIRED OF THE PROFESSIONAL STAFF. • BETTER MEASURES ARE THOUSE ALREADY DISCUSSED IN THE EARLIER SLIDES.
Reply to Requests for Additional Information—Representative Nicholas Gorham (concluded) HOWEVER, COMPARISONS WITH POPULATION SIZE DISTORT ANY CONCLUSION ABOUT STAFFING LEVELS • FOLLOWING THE LOGIC OF PERCAPITA SIZE, WE WOULD ERRONEOUSLY CONCLUDE THAT • MANY OF OUR EXECUTIVE BRANCH DEPARTMENTS ALSO HAVE LARGE STAFFING LEVELS RELATIVE TO OTHER STATES • RESEARCH FOR THESE COMPARISONS IS CURRENTLY UNDERWAY—AS SUGGESTED BY REPRESENTATIVE TIMOTHY A. WILLIAMSON