150 likes | 165 Views
This guide outlines the procedure for conducting experiments with institutional approval, including ethical considerations for nonhuman animals and human participants. It covers topics such as sample selection, power analysis, apparatus/instruments, scheduling, informed consent, instructions, and debriefing.
E N D
9 Procedure for Conducting an Experiment
Institutional Approval • Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) • reviews research protocols for studies using nonhuman animals • determines if proposed procedures are ethical • Institutional Review Board (IRB) • reviews research with human participants • primary concern is participant welfare • has informed consent been obtained? • do potential benefits of study outweigh risks to participants? • Animals • the Animal Welfare Act regulates care and housing • the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals provides a guide to using animals appropriately
Research Participants (cont'd) • Human participants • convenience sample of college students often used in psychological research • may not be representative of target population • some research requires special populations (e.g., school children) • using the Internet to recruit research participants is becoming more common • advantage of providing access to a larger and more diverse sample than otherwise possible • sample may not be representative of target population • important to report how participants were selected and assigned to research conditions
Power • How many research participants should be included in the research? • practicality must be balanced with the increased power that accompanies a large sample • Power– the probability of correctly rejecting null hypothesis • Power of at least .80 is desired (Reject Null 80% of the time) • As sample size increases, power increases • Factors that influence power: alpha level, sample size, and effect size • Effect size: the magnitude of the relationship between IV & DV in a population (Small, Medium, Large) • examine literature for approximate effect size estimation • Should conduct Power Analysis to estimate sample size
Power • Apparatus and/or Instruments • How will IV be manipulated and how will DV be measured? • depends on nature of research – may involve active participation by researcher or a particular type of apparatus (e.g., computers, MRI) • Apparatus and/or Instruments • Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers is a good source to identify research instruments • Procedure • detailed description of how experiment will be conducted • important to allow for future replication • Scheduling of research participants • consider issues of availability and anticipate drop out rates with human participants
Power (cont'd) • Consent to participate • informed consent necessary unless waived by IRB • consent form should include the following elements: • basic information about the study – where it will be conducted, duration • details about procedure of study including possible risks • any potential benefits that might be derived
Power (cont'd) • Consent to participate • consent form should include the following elements: • the type of compensation provided and penalty for early withdrawal • if using questionnaire, a statement indicating that participant can refuse to answer any question without penalty • for sensitive topics (e.g., depression, abuse) extra information for individuals who need assistance
Power (cont'd) • Consent to participate • consent form should include the following elements: • participants must be informed that they can withdraw from study at any time without penalty • participants must be informed as to how the records and data obtained will be kept confidential • Instructions • should be precise but not overly complex • warmup trials can assess understanding of instructions • Data collection
Debriefing or Postexperimental Interview • Functions • ethical • attempt to return participants to preexperimental state; particularly important if deception is used • educational • methodological • to establish effectiveness of independent variable or deception • sense of satisfaction
Debriefing or Postexperimental Interview (cont'd) • Functions • sense of satisfaction • feeling in participants that their participation has been beneficial to science and society
Debriefing or Postexperimental Interview (cont'd) • How to debrief • face to face generally preferred • begin by asking if participant has questions • question participant to determine if all aspects of study were clear • if deception was used
Debriefing or Postexperimental Interview (cont'd) • How to debrief • if deception was used • attempt to determine if participant discerned true nature of study • explain the purpose of using deception • ask participant not to reveal details of experiment to other participants
Debriefing or Postexperimental Interview (cont'd) • Is debriefing effective? • ethical and methodological likely to be fulfilled if procedures are followed; educational less likely
Pilot Study • A brief run-through of the entire experiment with a few participants prior to the actual collection of data • Serves several purposes: • establishes clarity of instructions • provides evidence that independent variable is being manipulated adequately • familiarizes researcher with the procedure