310 likes | 414 Views
Multiwavelength spectroscopy of high accretion rate polars. Axel Schwope Astrophysical Institute Potsdam Justus Vogel, Robert Schwarz (AIP) Fred Walter (SUNY) Vadim Burwitz (MPE) Klaus Reinsch (Göttingen). Polars – magnetic CVs. main sequence secondary magnetic white dwarf
E N D
Multiwavelength spectroscopy of high accretion rate polars Axel SchwopeAstrophysical Institute Potsdam Justus Vogel, Robert Schwarz (AIP) Fred Walter (SUNY) Vadim Burwitz (MPE) Klaus Reinsch (Göttingen)
Polars – magnetic CVs • main sequence secondary • magnetic white dwarf • accretion stream/curtain • magnetic field (10 – 200 MG) • synchronous rotation • no disk • cyclotron cooling • ~80 systems known • High/low states
Accretion scenarios 3) particle heatinghard X-ray supressed(low mass flow rate plus high B field) 1 2 Standard – stationary soft and hard X-rays balanced Filamentary – instationary soft X-ray excess(high mass flow rate and/orlow magnetic field)
Issues for XMM/Chandra • Temperature and density structure of accretion column (if there is one) X-ray line diagnostic
Issues for XMM/Chandra • Temperature and density structure of accretion column (if there is one) X-ray line diagnostic • Structure of accretion regions eclipsing systems
HU Aqr: fit to X-ray and UV-light curves (Schwope+01) Eclipse resolved Q ~ 3ol~ 450 km h~ 0.015 Rwd ~ 120 km
XMM-Newton observation of HU Aqr (May 17, 2002) Schwope et al 2004, ASP
HU Aqr: Simultaneous observations XMM & VLT(ULTRACAM) 16.5.2005 • VLT-UT3(ULTRACAM g) • XMM EPIC pn Schwarz et al 2008, A&A
Issues for XMM/Chandra • Temperature and density structure of accretion column (if there is one) X-ray line diagnostic • Extent of emission region eclipsing systems • Heating and cooling as a function of mass accretion rate SED of bright systems
SEDs – hydro and particle picture Shock heating Specific mass flow rate(B, Mwd, geometry, ...) Particle heating Beuermann 2004Fischer & Beuermann 2001
High accretion rate polars • Duty cycle ~ 50% (cf. Ramsay et al 2004) • The XMM-Newton conspiracyNONE of the ‚classical‘ bright polars was observed in a high accretion state • XMM triggers (V834 Cen AO5, VV Pup AO6)
Patterson et al 1984 Schwope et al 1995 VV Pup – the soft X-ray machine Porb = 100 min Two-pole geometry soft main pole less soft secondary pole spectral evolution through bright phase (shoulder)
VV Pup – the soft X-ray machine? MSSL polar survey Weak instationary accretion Thermal plasma ~4keV (Pandel et al 2005)
SED – low state HST (Araujo-Betancor+05) XMM/OM (Pandel+05) VLT (Mason+07) .
High state, main pole: cyclotron = (bright – faint) kTcyc ~ 10 keV Fcyc ~ 2e-11 cgs
High state, bright phaseX-ray spectrum bbody (30eV)+mekal(12keV)need warm absorberdon‘t need abs, reflect (?)
VV Pup – high & low state high-energy SED Main pole XMM: kT ~ 12 keV, 4e-12 cgs ROSAT/EUVE: ~ 8e-12 cgs Second pole XMM: kT ~ 4 keV, 4e-13 cgs ROSAT/EUVE: ~ 2e-13 cgs Low state XMM: kT ~ 4 keV, 5e-14 cgs ROSAT/EUVE: ---
VV Pup – high state SED EINSTEIN EUVE RGS FUSE EPIC ROSAT ROSAT & EUVE agree, EINSTEIN high Lx ruled out by FUSEBoth poles in ROSAT brighter than in XMM epoch
VV Pup results • Spectra (!) for low states and faint phases • T evolution: Shock vs particle heating • High state SED always dominated by soft X-rays at both poles additonal blob heating • Low state: No soft component observed
V834 Cen – non-dip spectrum wabs*absori (bbody(25eV) + mekal_cool(<1keV) + mekal_hot(12keV))need reflection
V834 Cen – SED kT (cyc)~ 10 keV Fcyc ~ 1e-11 cgs
Spectral energy distribution: 2XMMp1312+1736Vogel+08, astroph 0804.3946
Conclusions and outlook • SED fitting: relevance of multi-spectral data • Evolution of spectral parameters for given pole • Evolution of channels of energy release as a function of mass flow rate, B, Mwd and ? • Further insight from phase-resolved X-ray spectral analysis • And yes, we need more data and we do support XEUS (X-ray Doppler tomography)