1 / 11

COURSE REVIEW WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED, ANYWAY? PS 30: Winter 2005

COURSE REVIEW WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED, ANYWAY? PS 30: Winter 2005. THE 3-PRONGED APPROACH. Logic and principles of statistical analysis (lectures) Uses of software (sections and labs) Applications in political science: Course Reader (lectures) Student Projects (sections, labs, etc.).

farica
Download Presentation

COURSE REVIEW WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED, ANYWAY? PS 30: Winter 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. COURSE REVIEWWHAT HAVE WE LEARNED,ANYWAY?PS 30: Winter 2005

  2. THE 3-PRONGED APPROACH • Logic and principles of statistical analysis (lectures) • Uses of software (sections and labs) • Applications in political science: • Course Reader (lectures) • Student Projects (sections, labs, etc.)

  3. Cross-Tabulation Review Voting Intention by Gender: Chile, 1988 ___Gender (X)____ _M_ _F_ Σ Intention (Y) Yes 320 340 660 No 620 420 1040 Σ 940 760 1700

  4. Steps in Analyzing Cross-Tabulation • Check levels of measurement • Check array of table—X as column variable and Y as row variable, and “low-low” cells (if relevant) in upper left-hand corner • Check marginal frequencies • Compute and compare percentages (down the columns) • Form and strength: distribution of % and/or summary measure such as gamma • Significance: X2, which is a function of N and strength of relationship

  5. Computing and Comparing Percentages _____Gender______ __M__ __F__ Σ Intention Yes 34.044.7 38.8 No 66.055.3 61.2 Σ 100.0 100.0 100.0

  6. γ = (ad-bc)/(ad+bc) = - .221 X2 = Σ[(fo – fe)2 /fe] = 20.2 p < .001 Confidence bands at .05 level: ± 2.4%

  7. Regression Review Illegitimacy and Employment Y = % births outside marriage X = % economically active Unit of analysis: Scottish districts R = .666 R Square = .443 Adjusted R Square = .424 Standard Error of Estimate = 5.888

  8. Regression Coefficients: Intercept a = 106.570 Std error = 14.966 t = 7.121 p < .000 Slope b = -.922 Std error = .189 Beta = -.666 t = -4.884 p< .000 BOM = 106.570 - .922 EAP

  9. Steps in Analyzing Regression Coefficients • Strength: • Check values for r and (especially) r2 • Scrutinize scattergram • Form: • Write out full equation • Impose regression line on scattergram • Note signs of b coefficients • To observe predicted values of Y, plug in maximum and minimum values of X, mean value of X, and X values one standard deviation above and below mean of X

  10. Significance: • Check significance levels for F (or t) • Place confidence bands around b coefficient— • multiply standard error by ±1.96 • Ask yourself: Is this a function of the strength of • the observed relationship or of the N? • Multiple Regression: • Compare beta weights (standardized regression coefficients) • Note: interpretation of dummy variables

  11. TYPES OF RELATIONSHIPAND MULTIPLE REGRESSION • With Y as dependent variable: • Spurious: Association (coefficient) between X1 and Y vanishes (approaches zero) when X2 enters the equation • Enhancement: Total R2 for X1 plus X2 greatly exceeds r2 for either X1 or X2 (and X1 and X2 are not highly interrelated) • Specification: Difference in slopes, as determined through use of dummy variables

More Related