Proposal for work procedure of CJK editing team

1. 6 March 2006 TTC Proposal for work procedure of CJK editing team For information

2. Editing Team in CJK • At the December CJK NGN-WG, it was agreed to form a CJK editorial team for editing ITU draft recommendations. • At the January CJK ad-hoc meeting, it was decided to form 2 editorial teams to address Y.NGN-R1 requirements and Y.FRA. • Hope to agree to a working procedure for the CJK editing team, that will contribute to the improvement and completion of both documents for the April NGN-GSI meeting in Kobe.

3. Overall working procedure: agreed upon points • After the SG13 (or NGN-GSI) meeting, the CJK editors will carry out detailed studies of the docs and list up any issues such as: • Problematic statements in docs for any of the 3 countries • Insertion of new items • Editorial revisions • CJK editors will cooperate to produce revised versions of recommendation drafts • Exchange of opinions will done primarily by E-mail. • If necessary telephone/video/face-to-face conferences will be held. • Review of documents by CJK NGN-WG members to be conducted 2 weeks before the ITU's Delayed Contribution deadline. • As necessary comments by members other than editors • Editors may decide to further revise docs based on comments. • Submission of documents as contributions by main editor’s country. Editors choose details on which members will be the contributing authors. • Main points will be explained at ad-hoc meeting to be held before ITU meetings

4. Proposed editing team organizingguidelines Leader Members (1) Organization of the editing team The editing team consists of one team leader, two subleaders and editing members. - Generally, the document editor becomes the team leader. - Editorial representatives from each of the other 2 countries. - The leader and subleader choose the member (s) from their own country. (2) Role of the editing team The main role of the editing team is gathering and discussing CJK views. - The leader/ subleader collect/summarize the views from their country - Discussion of the issues from the issues list - Determination of the priority level for each issue based on the outcome of the discussions - Based on discussion outcome, the leader will gather the lower priority issues and create a revised document to submit to the ITU as a contribution. - For the high and medium priority items, each country will separately make a contribution to the ITU. Sub Members Sub Members

5. Editing work guidelines • Step 0: Preliminaries • Selection of the target documents for editing by CJK. • Selection of CJK editing representatives. • Step 1: Creation of the editing team • Selection of leader and subleaders • Leader and subleaders choose the editing team members from their respective countries. • Step 2: Laying out the editing work • The leader indicates the editing points of view. • Setting of editing schedule. • Step 3: Creation of issues list by each country • The leader and subleaders gather together the opinions from their respective countries into an issues list for each country. • Step 4: Creation of CJK‘s issue list • The leader summarizes the issues from each country's issue list into items. • The leader and subleaders cooperate to carry a detailed examination of the issues and to determine their respective priority levels. • The leader consults the CJK members about prioritized issues list. • Step 5A: Drafting of the revised version • The leader creates a revised draft to address the low priority issues (editorial level revisions.) • The revised version will be presented to CJK members by 2 weeks before the ITU submission deadline, and feedback will be received. Further changes made as needed and then the revised document will be submitted to the ITU as a contribution. • Step 5B: Addressing higher priority issues • As a general rule, each country will make a proposal to address the medium and high priority items and submit to the ITU as a contribution. • In some cases, the leader may decide it appropriate for the countries to collaborate on the content of the contributions. • The content of the contributions will be presented at the CJK ad-hoc meeting before NGN-GSI meeting.

6. Example of Issue List Table 1:Sample issue list Level of priority will be categorized as follows: L: Content does not need to be changed; editorial revision is necessary M： A partial revision of the content is necessary (such as adding/deleting items) H： A major change to the contents is necessary (Such as addition of a section, etc.)

7. Candidate Docs in NGN-GSI Table 2Candidate documents for editing (agreed) Leader

8. Editing team for Y.NGN-R1 Requirements • Make-up of editing team • Leader：　Atsunobu Narita (J: NTT Comware)　：　Editor of Y.NGN-R1 Requirements • a.narita@nttcom.co.jp • Sub-leader：　Fan Dong Yang (C：Siemens China) • dongyang.fan@siemens.com • Sub-leader：　Ilyoung Chong (K： H UFS Univ) • iychong@hufs.ac.kr • Make-up of each country's editing team • China：　Liu Duo (MII), Wu Tong (CT), Feng Wei (Huawei), Tu Jia Shun (ZTE), FangFang Gu(Alcatel) • Japan：　Atsushi Notoya (Oki), Keiichi Sasaki (NTT Comware), HIsashi Manabe (NEC) • Korea：　Chae-Sub Lee (ETRI), Jinho Hahm (ETRI), Michael Kim (TTA)

9. Editing team for Y.FRA • Make-up of editing team • Leader：　Naotaka Morita (J: NTT)　：　editor of Y.FRA • Motita.naotaka@lab.ntt.co.jp • Sub-leader：　Wang Ying (C：Huawei) • dudu@huawei.com • Sub-leader：　 Jinho Hahm (K: ETRI), • jhhahm@etri.re.kr • Make-up of each country's editing team • China：　 Liu Duo (MII), Wu Tong (CT), Feng Wei (Huawei), Tu Jia Shun (ZTE), FangFang Gu (Alcatel) • Japan：　Kiriko Ninomiya (NTT) • Korea：　Chae-Sub Lee (ETRI), Ilyoung Chong (H UFS Univ), Jeong Yun Kim (ETRI), Michael Kim (TTA)