1 / 44

Steve Gay - GIS Manager Mid America Regional Council Kansas City, MO

Steve Gay - GIS Manager Mid America Regional Council Kansas City, MO. Mid-America Regional Council Association of Governments for the Kansas City Metro Region Voluntary organization made up of Local Governments We represent 8 counties in two states, with 116 cities.

faris
Download Presentation

Steve Gay - GIS Manager Mid America Regional Council Kansas City, MO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Steve Gay - GIS Manager Mid America Regional Council Kansas City, MO

  2. Mid-America Regional Council • Association of Governments for the Kansas City Metro Region • Voluntary organization made up of Local Governments • We represent 8 counties in two states, with 116 cities

  3. Mid-America Regional Council • Seeks to build a stronger regional community through cooperation, leadership and planning. • Enhance the effectiveness of Local Government • Forum for addressing regional issues

  4. Overview of KC Metro GIS • Regional Centerline • Aerial Photography Cooperative • Population Forecasting - Paint the Town • Regional Geospatial Homeland Security

  5. KC Metro GIS • Committee of GIS professionals that address GIS issues that effect local governments in the MARC region • Communicate Knowledge and Expertise • Reduce costs through cooperative agreements • Develop Policies and Standards

  6. KC Metro GIS Communication Tools • Quarterly Meetings • Website -www.marc.org/gis/ • Newsletter - Intersections

  7. Regional Centerline • Support e9-1-1 initiative • Wireless call reference • MSAG Synchronization • Public Safety Answering Points (PSAP)

  8. 9-1-1 Call Routing

  9. Regional Centerline • MARC has Contracted with ESRI • Additional Centerline Functionality • Workflow Enhancements • Data Model Design

  10. Regional Centerline • MARC contracts with GeoComm for Centerline Maintenance • Staffing • Hardware/Software • Data Model Design • Workflow Documentation

  11. Regional Centerline • Current Centerline Maintenance • Digital (GIS or CAD) • Hard copy • Cookie Cutter

  12. Regional Centerline • ESRI is Evaluating/Recommending • Data Standards • Data model similar to industry standard transportation model • Workflow Enhancements

  13. Enhanced Data flow

  14. Regional Aerial Photography • Developed consistent specifications • Mixed resolution • Cost allocation/sharing/reduction • Expected collection – Spring 2006

  15. Proposed aerial photography resolution

  16. Beyond Orthophotography • LIDAR quotes • Images/Data to support Contouring • Oblique imagery

  17. Land Use and Population Forecasting andRegional Parcel Data Collection

  18. Land Use

  19. Regional Homeland Security Geospatial and Data Server Strategic Plan

  20. Why a Strategic Plan? • Use GIS to support Homeland Security and Public Safety • Homeland Security funding? • Urban Area Security Initiatives • Homeland Security Geospatial Work group • Regional Homeland Security Coordinating Committee • KC Metro GIS

  21. Geospatial Homeland Security Strategic Plan Initial Questions: • GIS data for the region? • Software to be used during emergencies? • Server Hardware needs? • Can we integrate with Federal level initiatives? • How can we secure long term funding?

  22. Regional Data Server Needs Assessment Initial Questions: • What are the current or proposed regional public safety applications? • Server hardware required to support these applications? • System Support? Data Center, Personnel and funding. • Is there opportunity to share resources?

  23. Development of the Plan Initial Steps • Selected Consultant - PBS&J • Kick-off meeting • Individual meetings in each county plus KCMO • Adopted an “All Hazards” approach

  24. Stakeholders • Emergency Managers • GIS and IT Managers • Police and Fire Personnel • State and Federal representatives • Public Health • Utility • Hospital

  25. Needs Assessment Methods • Individual community interview sessions • Survey of capabilities and resources • Data Inventory Matrix • Evaluation of Existing Preparedness & Response Plans

  26. Summary of Needs Assessment • GIS capabilities vary greatly • Data and Aerial Photography vary greatly (except roads and property data) • Software platform most used – ESRI • Several Communities Utilize WebEOC

  27. Gap Analysis • Sharing data across State and County Boundaries • Critical Infrastructure Data Layers – inconsistent • Relationships between GIS and Emergency Management • Published standards for collection and development of data.

  28. Synthesis of Multiple Planning Efforts Key Plans: • Regional Homeland Security Strategy Plan • Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan • Federal Planning - National Preparedness Goal

  29. Regional Homeland Security Strategic Plan • Planning and Readiness • Coordination and effective Relationships • Adequate Resources • Training and Exercise

  30. Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan

  31. Federal PlanningNational Preparedness Goal Source: DHS National Geospatial Preparedness Needs Assessment

  32. Federal PlanningNational Preparedness Goal All Hazards approach to national preparedness: • Prevent • Protect • Respond • Recover

  33. Geospatial Objectives • Collect the right GIS data • Make it sharable • Ensure its security • Integrate it into emergency operations

  34. Geospatial Objectives • Collect the right GIS data • Identification of key layers • Identifying who has what • Filling the gaps of priority data • Collection – methods and standards

  35. Geospatial Objectives • Make the Data sharable • Metadata • Standards Naming conventions • Software – Common Operating Picture • Web Portals • MOUs (data sharing and maintenance aggreements) • Server needs (ownership, capacity, location, accessibility) • Connectivity needs

  36. Geospatial Objectives • Ensure the Data is Secure • Redundancy • Secure sites • Reconfigurable server and connectivity

  37. Geospatial Objectives • Integrate it into emergency operations • Daily uses • Training and exercises • Organizational structure • GIS Operations

  38. Geospatial Homeland Security and Regional Data Server Plan Next steps • Drafting a Strategic Plan • Education and Outreach Plan • Implementation Plan • Priority of action items • Procedure for developing actions

  39. Questions? Steve Gay sgay@marc.org Steve Gay - GIS Manager Mid America Regional Council Kansas City, MO

More Related