1 / 21

TAXES AND LONG-RUN ECONOMIC GROWTH: CAN TAX REFORM RAISE “THE SPEED LIMIT” IN DENMARK?

Delve into the correlation between taxes and economic growth in Denmark while analyzing the impact of tax reform on long-term prosperity and productivity acceleration.

farroyo
Download Presentation

TAXES AND LONG-RUN ECONOMIC GROWTH: CAN TAX REFORM RAISE “THE SPEED LIMIT” IN DENMARK?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TAXES AND LONG-RUN ECONOMIC GROWTH: CAN TAX REFORM RAISE “THE SPEED LIMIT” IN DENMARK? Carl-Johan Dalgaard NORDIC TAX ECONOMIST MEETING OCTOBER 1 2012

  2. THREE ISSUES: • WHAT IS THE MAIN ENGINE OF LONG-RUN GROWTH? • HOW DOES TAXES AFFECT LONG-RUN GROWTH? • THOUGHTS ON TAXES AND THE SCOPE FOR A PRODUCTIVITY ACCELERATIONS IN DENMARK

  3. THREE POINTS: • TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY • FIRM DYNAMICS AND TRANSFER OF IDEAS • ONE FOCUS AREA: TRADE

  4. WHAT IS THE MAIN ENGINE OF LONG-RUN GROWTH?

  5. GDP PER WORK HOUR PHYSICAL CAPITAL HUMAN CAPITAL (Total Factor) PRODUCTIVITY Equipment; plants; natural capital Schooling; health ”Technology”; Public goods Obviously: Lots and lots of interdependence

  6. QUANTITATIVE IMPORTANCE: • About 2/3 of economic growth within rich nations is due to (total factor) productivity • 90% of the differences in growth rates (GDP per employed) across countries is due to TFP • Unpacking aggregate TFP • Entry/ Exit & Selection of firms. Foundation: New ideas (from abroad) • Public goods provision (infrastructure; efficient bureaucracy; Public R&D)

  7. HOW TAXES AFFECT LONG-RUN GROWTH

  8. Potential direct impact on Total factor productivity • The ”Dark side” of taxes: Reduces transfer of ideas. • Reduces foreign exposure and affects firm selection (e.g., tariffs). Limits access and exposure to new ideas. • Reduces the incentive to become (self-) employed (income tax).Introduction of new ideas; new firms. • Increases the costs of capital (corporate tax; cap gains tax). Introduction of new ideas embedded in capital equipment • Limits firm exit (subsidies) • The ”Lighter side” of taxes: What taxes help finance. • Supply of public goods (e.g., infrastructure; bureacratic efficiency; Public R&D) • Insurance: Social security reduces the potential ”downside” from being self-employed

  9. ½ • Theory (e.g., Barro, 1990): Non-linear impact from tax system • Empirics?

  10. Income; property; profits; trade Defense; health; education;transport & communication

  11. In practise it appears that the net impact from tax and expenditures has been near zero in most OECD countries 1970 -> (Gemmel et al, 2011) • Bottom line: Composition of taxes (and expenditures) is key

  12. THOUGHTS ON TAXES AND THE SCOPE FOR A PRODUCTIVITY ACCELERATIONS IN DENMARK

  13. Before we get started … humility • Two world wars; the demographic transition; the great depression; from agriculture to industry; mass education; stagflation; increasing female labor market participation. 2 percent per annum.

  14. Hourly productivity: EU G7/USA, 1970-2009 (black); DEU/USA, 1970-2009 (green). Note: (a) G7 is DEU, UK, FRA, ITA. Data: Penn World Tables 7.0. Hourly productivity, Denmark relative to US, 1970-2009. Souece: Penn World Tables 7.0

  15. Reignite the convergence process. Will admit a temporary growth acceleration. • Academic literature: Temporary acceleration in growth (10 yrs av). Robust finding: TFP changes; Trade changes (i.e., Imp + Exp / GDP) • International interaction does spur productivity; influences transfer of ideas and thereby entry/exit and selection • One focus area: Tariff (and non-tariff) barriers on trade in goods and services

  16. Suggestive evidence of link between international interaction and growth: Case of Singapore

  17. Non-tariff Barriers. Francois og Hoekmann on trade restrictions on services (JEL, 2010, p. 662): “…the indexes […] also point to generally higher restrictions in developing countries than in the OECD. At the same time though, some OECD countries (Australia, Canada, and Denmark, for example) have restrictions comparable to the averages prevailing in major developing country economies.” (my emphasis) • Tariffs. Composition of tariffs (Nunn and Trefler, 2010)

  18. Bias in tariffs. Positive correlation means ”more protection” of more skill intensive goods • Source: Nunn og Trefler, 2010, Am. Ec. J. – macro. Note: Growth corrected for impact of investments and human capital . The figure depicts the partial correlation between bias in tariffs and growth.

  19. CONCLUDING REMARKS

  20. Key importance of TFP; firm dynamics and transfer of knowledge • Taxes (and expenditures) likely influence this process. Composition of tax and expenditures. • Productivity accelerations seem to be associated with increased international interaction • Suggests a focus on tariffs and trade regulation. Structure of tariffs might be more important than levels.

  21. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

More Related