240 likes | 388 Views
#7.5 Campus Partners Working Together to Create Accessible Online Learning Environments . Panelists: Steve Adams, Distributed Learning Support Services Lacy K. Ford, Senior Vice Provost Christy Friend, Center for Teaching Excellence Aisha Haynes, Center for Teaching Excellence
E N D
#7.5 Campus Partners Working Together to Create Accessible Online Learning Environments
Panelists: Steve Adams, Distributed Learning Support Services Lacy K. Ford, Senior Vice Provost Christy Friend, Center for Teaching Excellence Aisha Haynes, Center for Teaching Excellence Karen Pettus, Student Disability Services
Overview • Vice-Provost’s Introduction (video) • Quality Review Timeline • Background (pre-2010) • Groundwork (2010-2013) • Building a process (2013-2014) • Year 1 Successes • Challenges and Next Steps
Introduction • Senior Vice Provost Lacy K. Ford • Commitment to Quality Accessible Online Courses • Link to Senior Vice Provost Lacy K. Ford Video
University of South Carolina Total Enrollment 45,457 Undergraduate 36,220 Graduate 6,867 Professional 1,470 • Main and Senior Campuses • Columbia • Aiken • Upstate • Beaufort • Regional Campuses • Lancaster • Salkehatchie • Sumter • Union
Background Thirty-two graduate degree and certificate programs through DL Online (Blackboard, Adobe Connect), DVD & telepresence Enrollment Growth 10,365 (AY 09) 13,665 (AY 10) 15,582 (AY 11) 16,602 (AY 12) 17,883 (AY 13) 18,808 (AY 14)
2010 • Distributed Learning Move by Vice Provost • Academic services leadership • Closer involvement with academic units • Course approval process revision • Unified vision and blueprint • Collaboration established
2011-2012 • Instructional Designers hired • University subscription to Quality Matters Program • Training for Instructional Designers • 7 Ways to Make Your Class Accessible
2011-2012 • September 24th, 2012: • OCR presentation on accessibility of online material • New online technologies and delivery modes • Enterprise applications and opportunities
2012-2013 • Dr. Ford’s assessment of online courses • Adoption of Quality Matters rubric for best practices • $1,500 course revision grant for faculty
Spring 2013 • Provost’s Quality Review Process Created • Process begins and ends with faculty • Rubric addresses course quality and accessibility • Collaborative units provide ongoing support • Provost’s Office announces and provides incentives
Spring 2013 DL Course Review Flow Chart
Summer 2013 • Getting the Word Out • Documents sent to department chairs/deans • CTE develops forms and resources • Faculty DL committee consulted
2013-2014 • Process Underway • Designers worked with faculty to revise courses • Weekly CTE meetings to discuss review process • Designers review courses and make recommendations • Faculty DL Quality Assurance committee reviewed materials/made recommendations
2013-2014 • Getting Faculty Buy-In • Campus partners streamline process for faculty • Process begins and ends with departments/faculty • Emphasis on flexibility and meeting faculty needs • Incentives/recognition for successful course revisions
Results • Year 1 (108 courses): • 34 passed review • 16 expected to pass by Fall 2014 • 27 retired by department • 22 faculty received $1500 + commendation letter
Success Story 1: • Vera Polyakova-Norwood • Director of Online Learning • Nursing • Challenge: Transcripts for frequent lecture updates • Solutions: • Faculty pooled grant funds • Use Dragon Naturally Speaking and Student Assistants
Success Story 2: • Maureen Petkewich • Instructor • Statistics • Challenge: Captions for videos showing math calculations • Solution: Supplemental grant funds to hire captioning service
Success Story 3: • Rebecca Collier • Adjunct Faculty • Women & Gender Studies • Challenge: Retrofitting existing voiceover PowerPoint lectures • Solutions: • Teaching assistant created transcripts • Will create scripts for future lecture preparation • “I like how the PowerPoint videos have a notes tab that puts in words exactly what you are saying in the videos, allows me to follow along and take good notes easily.”
Other Successes • 11 faculty/8 staff receive award from Disability Services • Invitations to present at conferences • Faculty and student testimonials
Next Steps • Quality Review for all DL graduate courses • Goal: All DL courses undergo review every 3-5 years • Goal: Work with technology services to create system-wide accessibility solutions