1 / 18

Update on Rome Results

Agenda A eff Fall-off past 10 GeV V3R3P7 Classification Trees Covariance Scaled PSFs Pair Energies. Update on Rome Results. A eff Fall-off. No Cuts - Not "NoCal". After "GoodEnergy" Cut. After PSF("CORE") Cut. A eff Post New Cts. No Cuts - Not "NoCal".

fay-barr
Download Presentation

Update on Rome Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Agenda Aeff Fall-off past 10 GeV V3R3P7 Classification Trees Covariance Scaled PSFs Pair Energies Update on Rome Results

  2. Aeff Fall-off No Cuts - Not "NoCal" After "GoodEnergy" Cut After PSF("CORE") Cut

  3. Aeff Post New Cts No Cuts - Not "NoCal" After "GoodEnergy" Cut After PSF("CORE") Cut

  4. Energy Cts NoCal: < 2 r.l. or < 5 MeV LowCal: < 350 MeV MedCal: < 3500 MeV HighCal: > 3500 MeV CAL Energy Def's and Good/Bad Breakdown

  5. Energy Cts Summary Plot SR Cut ForV3R3P7

  6. Thin VTX/1Tkr Tree Energy Selection: GoodE.Prob > .20 + Standard Cleaning (See Rome Talk)

  7. Thin VTX Core

  8. Thin VTX Regression - Prediction

  9. Rome: Thin PSF's - Integrated over FoV 4 Combinations of Cuts (CORE/Pred) Cuts: 2/1 Cuts: 1/1 Meets SR Events Eff.: 94.5% Ratio 95/68 > 3 Cuts: 3/4 Cuts: 3/2 Events Eff.: 52.3% Events Eff.: 19.1%

  10. Post-Rome: Thin PSF's - Integrated over FoV 4 Combinations of Cuts (1-CORE/4-Pred) Cuts: 2/1 Cuts: 2/2 Cuts: 2/4 Cuts: 2/3

  11. Covariance Scaled PSF's (from Covariance.ppt presentation to Analysis Group, July, 2003) A bit of math then shows that: and Definitions: Where all the variables come from the Merit-ntuple. (See my covariance ppt for details on Tkr1ThetaErr and Tkr1PhiErr - these are derived from the covariance matrix elements event-by-event)

  12. Scaled PSFs: Energy Dependence Comment: Works well except in regions where energies fed to Kalman Filter are in-accurate. Specifically below 50 MeV and above 10 GeV 18000 < E < 56000 56000 < E < 180000 5600 < E < 18000 1800 < E < 5600 560 < E < 1800 180 < E < 560 56 < E < 180 18 < E < 56

  13. Scaled PSFs: Angle Dependence McEnergy < 10000 MeV -.4<cos(q)<-.2 -.6<cos(q)<-.4 Edge of FoV -.8<cos(q)<-.6 -1<cos(q)<-.8 On Axis

  14. Universal PSF Curve??? 1) Scale Factors adjusted to 2.38 & 3.36 Thin / Thick respectively 2) IMcoreProb > .2 & IMpsfErrPred < 3. (SR cuts) 3) Energy cut: .5 <Tkr1ConEne/EvtEnergySumOpt < 1. Note: This cuts out almost 1/2 the data !!!! (44.4%)

  15. Pair Energies: The Missing Half Only Valid Region: [.5, 1.) Optimization done in

  16. Pair Energies: The Missing Half (2) Optimization done in & Consraint to QED

  17. Post Rome: Next Steps 1) Use EvtEnergySumOpt for constraint energy 2) Try 1/E optimization - shouldn't be worse then the present situation. 3) Fit Shower Model Leakage parameters out past 180 GeV.

More Related