1 / 20

Getting Colleagues on Board

Getting Colleagues on Board. Course: Using CEM data in Practice Day 2 Session 1 Tuesday 30 th May 2012 Sam Naismith. Outline. Background A case study Staff Involvement Feedback from and to staff Day to day staff support? Patience Considerations?. Background.

felcia
Download Presentation

Getting Colleagues on Board

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Getting Colleagues on Board • Course: Using CEM data in Practice • Day 2 Session 1 • Tuesday 30th May 2012 • Sam Naismith

  2. Outline • Background • A case study • Staff Involvement • Feedback from and to staff • Day to day staff support? • Patience • Considerations?

  3. Background • New School, new Concept? • Very few staff

  4. Aims • Increase the confidence of all pupils • Contribute to the educational process which helps all pupils to surpass their potential • Inform pupils on their current and potential achievement • Inform parents about how their children are progressing and where they can support and improve the learning process • Inform teachers on the best way to stretch and support each pupil • To inform Senior Leadership of progress throughout the school

  5. Principles • Have reliable base line data on all pupils • A system that measures progress against own ability • Break away from NC levels • Redefine “every child matters” • Recognise that 11, 12 & 13 year olds are children • Informative to pupils, parents and staff • Reliable and personal • Time efficient for staff

  6. The system • After looking at a few different techniques and their combinations. The method of using a Standardising score was decided on. • This was converted back to a MidYIS score and from that a predictive grade is given. • The system works by a teacher entering in a test/project mark out of 100.

  7. Staff involvement • I couldn’t do the maths!

  8. Staff involvement • The training process • Staff training day - introduction • Dummy run to check • Feedback from and to staff • Go live and review

  9. What staff see

  10. SLT/HoD view

  11. Yes but... • Too much information

  12. Yes but... • Too fast • Is it accurate • Professional judgement? • How does it work?

  13. Participation • Effort, behaviour and engagement • Comments on “-’s” and changes

  14. Text

  15. Feedback to/from staff • Pupils like it - tells them what they have to do • Individualised but more work! • Motivates and rewards most pupils

  16. Day to Day support • AEN Coordinator - Skills • Senior Tutor - picking up on slackers • SLT - pick up on “soft” or “Hard” departments

  17. Patience is a virtue..

  18. Considerations • The maths! • Quality of SPAG • A load of A*’s • Early days • New staff

  19. Over to you..

More Related