1 / 21

Simplex Method Meeting 5

Simplex Method Meeting 5. Course : D0744 - Deterministic Optimization Year : 2009. What to learn?. Artificial variables Big-M method. The Facts. To start, we need a canonical form

felice
Download Presentation

Simplex Method Meeting 5

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Simplex MethodMeeting 5 Course : D0744 - Deterministic Optimization Year : 2009

  2. What to learn? Artificial variables Big-M method

  3. The Facts To start, we need a canonical form If we have a  constraint with a nonnegative right-hand side, it will contain an obvious basic variable (which?) after introducing a slack var. If we have an equality constraint, it contains no obvious basic variable If we have a  constraint with a nonnegative right-hand side, it contains no obvious basic variable even after introducing a surplus var.

  4. 2x + 3y  5  2x + 3y + s = 5, s  0 (s basic) 2x + 3y = 5  ??????? Infeasible if x=y=0! 2x + 3y  5  2x + 3y -s = 5, s  0 (??????) Infeasible if x=y=0! ?????????????????? Compare!

  5. One Equality??? 2x + 3y = 5  2x + 3y + a = 5, a = 0 (I) (s basic, but it should be 0!) How do we force a = 0? This is of course not feasible if x=y=0, as 0+0+0 5!

  6. 2x + 3y = 5  2x + 3y + a = 5, a = 0 (I) (a basic, but it should be 0!) How do we force a = 0? This is of course not feasible if x=y=0, as 0+0+0 5 Idea: solve a first problem with Min {a | constraint (I) + a  0 + other constraints }! One Equality???

  7. Artificial Variables Notice: In an equality constraint, the extra variable is called an artificial variable. For instance, in 2x + 3y + a = 5, a = 0 (I) a is an artificial variable.

  8. One Inequality  ??? 2x + 3y  5  2x + 3y - s = 5, s  0 (I) s could be the basic variable, but it should be  0 and for x=y=0, it is -5 ! How do we force s  0? ?

  9. 2x + 3y  5  2x + 3y - s = 5, s  0 (I) s could be the basic variable, but it should be  0 and it is -5 for x=y=0! How do we force s  0? By making it 0! how?

  10. 2x + 3y  5  2x + 3y - s = 5, s  0 (I) s could be basic, but it should be  0 and it is -5 for x=y=0! How do we force s  0? By making it 0! But we have to start with a canonical form… so treat is as an equality constraint! 2x + 3y - s+ a = 5, s  0, a  0 and Min a

  11. Artificial Variables Notice: In a  inequality constraint, the extra variable is called an artificial variable. For instance, in 2x + 3y – s+ a = 5, s  0, a  0 (I) a is an artificial variable. In a sense, we allow temporarily a small amount of cheating, but in the end we cannot allow it!

  12. What if we have many such = and  constraints? 7x - 3y – s1+ a1 = 6, s1,a1  0 (I) 2x + 3y + a2 = 5, a2  0 (II) a1 and a2 are artificial variables, s1 is a surplus variable. One minimizes their sum: Min {a1+a2 | a1, a2  0, (I), (II), other constraints} i.e., one minimizes the total amount of cheating!

  13. Then What? We have two objectives: Get a “feasible” canonical form Maximize our original problem Two methods: big M method phase 1, then phase 2

  14. Big-M Method Combine both objectives : (1) Min iai (2) Max j cjxj into a single one: (3) Max – M iai + j cjxj where M is a large number, larger than anything subtracted from it. If one minimizes j cjxj then the combined objective function is Min M iai + j cjxj

  15. The Big M Method The simplex method algorithm requires a starting bfs. Previous problems have found starting bfs by using the slack variables as our basic variables. If an LP have ≥ or = constraints, however, a starting bfs may not be readily apparent. In such a case, the Big M method may be used to solve the problem. Consider the following problem.

  16. Example Bevco manufactures an orange-flavored soft drink called Oranj by combining orange soda and orange juice. Each orange soda contains 0.5 oz of sugar and 1 mg of vitamin C. Each ounce of orange juice contains 0.25 oz of sugar and 3 mg of vitamin C. It costs Bevco 2¢ to produce an ounce of orange soda and 3¢ to produce an ounce of orange juice. Bevco’s marketing department has decided that each 10-oz bottle of Oranj must contain at least 30 mg of vitamin C and at most 4 oz of sugar. Use linear programming to determine how Bevco can meet the marketing department’s requirements at minimum cost.

More Related