270 likes | 484 Views
E N D
2. Motivation Increasing demand for network access from vehicles
E.g., VoIP, Web, email
Cellular access expensive
Ubiquity of WiFi
Cheaper, higher peak throughput compared to cellular 2
3. Our work 3
4. Talk outline 4
5. VanLAN: Our Vehicular Testbed 5
6. Measurement study 6
7. Handoff policies studied
Practical hard handoff
Associate with one BS
Current 802.11
Ideal hard handoff
Use future knowledge
Impractical 7
8. Handoff policies studied
Practical hard handoff
Associate with one BS
Current 802.11
Ideal hard handoff
Use future knowledge
Impractical
Ideal soft handoff
Use all BSes in range
Performance upper bound 8
9. Comparison of handoff policies 9
10. Talk outline 10
11. Designing a practical soft handoff policy 11
12. Why are existing solutions inadequate? 12
13. 13
14. 14
15. 15
16. 16
17. 17
18. 18
19. Talk outline 19
20. Evaluation 20 Mention the voip and tcp were deployedMention the voip and tcp were deployed
21. ViFi reduces disruptions in our deployment 21
22. ViFi improves VoIP performance 22
23. ViFi improves performance of short TCP transfers 23
24. ViFi uses medium efficiently 24
25. Conclusions Our work improves performance of interactive applications for vehicular WiFi networks
Interactive applications perform poorly in vehicular settings due to frequent disruptions
ViFi, a diversity-based handoff protocol significantly reduces disruptions
Experiments on VanLAN shows that ViFi significantly improves performance of VoIP and short TCP transfers 25
26. Practical soft handoff 26
27. 27
28. 28