1 / 9

Auburn’s Strategy for Competency Assessment

Auburn’s Strategy for Competency Assessment. Cal Clark & Kathleen Hale NASPAA 2012. Central Conclusion I. Start work on Competency Assessment at beginning of Self Study After 2010 Accreditation Institute, this became our top priority

fifi
Download Presentation

Auburn’s Strategy for Competency Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Auburn’s Strategy forCompetency Assessment Cal Clark & Kathleen Hale NASPAA 2012

  2. Central Conclusion I • Start work on Competency Assessment at beginning of Self Study • After 2010 Accreditation Institute, this became our top priority • Decide how competencies will be defined and assessed as soon as possible • We decided to use written assignments in Core classes

  3. Central Conclusion II • The “Grubby Details” are probably the most important • Even after Competency Assessment System formulated and approved, several iterations of implementation are needed before it will work smoothly • Surprises in our first assessment of Universal Competency #3 • Continuing need to fill in details

  4. Central Conclusion III • Recruitment of Nucleus Faculty to work on this project key • Types of faculty response: 1) Enthusiastic, 2)Passively Accepting, 3) Hostile • Auburn: • Committee of three Enthusiasts • Support by rest of Nucleus Faculty • No overt opposition

  5. Major Components of Plan • Annual Assessment of 5 Universal Competencies, beginning Spring 2012 • Annual Assessment of Competencies in 4 Formal Specializations, beginning Spring 2013 • Assessment of MPA Student Portfolios, beginning Spring 2013

  6. Rubrics for Assessing Competencies • 1. Knowledge of Field • Demonstrates knowledge of public administration concepts, principles & theories • 2. Analytic Ability • Demonstrates the ability to analyze information about the public sector and to apply appropriate public administration concepts, principles & theories • Effective Communication • Demonstrates the ability to format and structure assignments with writing that is clear, concise, and properly edited

  7. Time Line: Universal Competencies • Oct 2010 Accreditation Institute • Nov 2010 Assessment Committee appointed (Hale, Chair; Brown; Clark) • Dec 2010 Overview at faculty meeting • Nov-Feb Committee develops Assessment Plan • Feb 2011 Nucleus Faculty approves Plan • April 2012 Committee Assessment of Universal Competency #3 approved &submitted to NASPAA

  8. Time Line: MPA Portfolio • Feb 2011 Overview of Portfolio approved • Nov 2011 Hale & Clark meet with students • Nov 2011 Faculty discuss student concerns • Jan 2012 Committee formulates proposal • Feb 2012 Faculty approve Portfolio structure • May 2012 Detailed assignment circulated to students • Oct 2012 Hale & Clark meet with students

  9. Documents Available on Request • Competency-based Assessment System • Complete Plan • Competency Decision-Making • Summary of Development, including minutes from student & faculty meetings • Assessment of NASPAA Universal Competency 3 • Full Assessment Report • Competencies for Specializations • Plan for assessing Specialization Competenciesclarkcm@auburn.edu

More Related