1 / 30

3.1 Determinants The Laplace Expansion

3.1 Determinants The Laplace Expansion. What’s the use?. All square matrices have a real number determinant We can use the determinant to see if the matrix is invertible. We can use the determinant to find the inverse.

filia
Download Presentation

3.1 Determinants The Laplace Expansion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 3.1 DeterminantsThe Laplace Expansion

  2. What’s the use? • All square matrices have a real number determinant • We can use the determinant to see if the matrix is invertible. • We can use the determinant to find the inverse. • We can also use determinants to solve systems of equations (using Cramer’s Rule)

  3. Definition • Given a (1 x 1) matrix A = [a]: • det[a] = a • We know A is invertible as long as a ≠ 0. • So for a (1x1) A is invertible iff a≠0. • A-1 = [1/a]

  4. Definition for (2x2) • Recall what the inverse of a (2x2) matrix was: • The inverse clearly exists as long as (ad - bc) ≠ 0. • We call det A = ad - bc • Again, A is invertible iff det A ≠ 0

  5. Minors and Cofactors • Mij(A) = (i,j) minor of an n x n matrix, A: • is the determinant of the (n-1)x(n-1) matrix formed from A by deleting row i and column j. • Cij(A) = (i,j) cofactor of A • = (-1)i+jMij(A) • C = ± M depending on row and column

  6. …continued • Since Cij(A) = (-1)i+jMij(A), note the simple method we can use for finding the sign to apply to M to get C based on the position of cofactor in A:

  7. Example: • Find the minors and cofactors of positions (2,1),(2,2) and (2,3).

  8. Determinant of an (nxn), n≥2 • Laplace Expansion: • We can use the Laplace Expansion along any row or column to find the determinant of (n x n) mtx, A: • Expansion along rowi: det(A) = ai1Ci1(A) + ai2Ci2(A) + … + ainCin(A) • Expansion along column j: det(A) = a1jC1j(A) + a2jC2j(A) + … + anjCnj(A)

  9. Example • Find the determinant of our earlier matrix:

  10. Example • Find the determinant of the following matrix:

  11. Helpful Hints to reduce work • Note that if we have a matrix with a row or column of zeros, the determinant is 0. • Recall also that we can apply elementary row operations to matrix A to create a row of zeros in some matrices. • We can create some zeros in a row by applying elementary row operations in all matrices. • The question is, what effect will applying the row operations have on the determinant.

  12. Theorem 2 • Let A be an (n x n) matrix. • If A has a row or column of zeros, det A = 0. • If two distinct rows (or columns) of A are interchanged, the determinant of the resulting matrix is (- det A). • If a row (or column) of A is multiplied by a constant, u, the determinant of the resulting matrix is u(det A). • If two distinct rows (or columns) of A are identical, det A = 0. • If a mult of a row of A is added to a diff’t row, the determinant of the resulting mtx is det A (cols too).

  13. Proof • Property 2: Proof by induction, • Prove for n=2:

  14. Prop 2 (cont) • For A = (nxn),n>2, we swap rows c and d to get B. • In finding det A and det B, we expand on a row other than c or d, we get the same coefficients w/ same signs, and the minors are the same except rows c and d are swapped. • We continue this process, always getting the same coefficients w/ the same signs until we get down to (2x2)’s • These (2x2)’s will be • We have shown that for (2x2)’s, det B = -det A, so for each of our terms (which have same coeff’s so far), the det B = -detA, so all of our terms will simply have opp signs.

  15. Proof of Property 4 • If two distinct rows (or cols) of A are same, det A=0 • First swap the two rows that are the same to get B • B = A so det A = det B • Also, by prop. 2, det B = - det A • So det A = - det A which can only happen if det A = 0. 

  16. Proof of property 5 • Proof: B is obtained from A by adding k times row c to row d. • So row d of B is now: [ad1 + kac1, ad2 + kac2,…,adn +kacn) • The cofactors of this row do not depend on their values, only on their position and on the rest of the matrix, so they remain the same. So Cdj (B) = Cdj (A) • If we expand along row d of B:

  17. Continued... • This matrix C is just obtained from A by replacing row d by row c since the coefficients are from row c and we expand along d so that row c remains in the minor matrix. • Therefore, matrix C has two identical rows, and by property 4, det C=0 • Therefore, det B=det A 

  18. Finding determinants is easier • Now we can simplify the matrices of which we need to find the determinant: • row or column reduce to create more zeros • swapping rows/cols changes sign • adding multiples of a row/col to another doesn’t change • factor out a common factor from a row or column • pulls out as a multiplier on the determinant

  19. Examples

  20. Examples • Find all x such that det A = 0 (making A not invertible).

  21. Examples • show that: • Matrix of this type is called a Vandermonde matrix. • Can extend formula to (n x n) case

  22. Theorem 3 • If A is (n x n), then det(uA) = un det A for any u (try it…) • Proof:

  23. Triangular matrices • Lower Triangular: all entries above main diagonal are zero • Upper Triangular: all entries below main diagonal are zero • Note what happens with the determinant: • Theorem 4: the determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of the entries on the main diagonal.

  24. This makes life easy! • Can we carry all matrices to triangular form using row operations? Of course! • So to find the determinant, reduce to triangular form noting the row operations you have used along the way. • Remember: • when you swap rows, switch sign of determinant • when you mult a row times a value, the det of what remains must be multiplied by recipricol • when you add a mult of one row to another, nothing changes.

  25. Continued.. • Note that if when you reduce, you end up with a row of zeros, the determinant will be zero (as it should be since the matrix will not be invertible.

  26. Theorem 5 • Given the following block matrices w/ A and B square:

  27. Proof of Theorem 5(ind) • show true for A (1 x 1)

  28. Proof of Theorem 5(ind) • assume true for A (k x k) For A (k x k) • Prove true for A ((k+1) x (k+1))

  29. Proof of Theorem 5(ind) • Mi1 is the det of submatrix (Si1(T)) formed by deleting the ith row and 1st col of T Since only getting rid of row of A and same row of X, and col 1 ofA and col 1 of 0. • Si1 (A) will be (k x k). • Mi1(T) =det(Si1(T)) = det(Si1(A))detB (by induction) • =Mi1(A)detB

  30. Proof of Theorem 5(ind) 

More Related