110 likes | 315 Views
Projections of the thermohaline circulation in OAGCMs : toward an understanding of uncertainties. Didier Swingedouw Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement France. Uncertainty for the future. Thermohaline circulation. THC : a system with complex feedbacks
E N D
Projections of the thermohaline circulation in OAGCMs: toward an understanding of uncertainties Didier Swingedouw Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement France
Uncertainty for the future Thermohaline circulation • THC : a system with complex feedbacks • Coupled with the atmosphere : an AOGCM is necessary
Mean global Temperature Temps (années) NIS2 CO2 (ppm) Scénario Snow Glacier CTRL 560 NIS2 Ocean CTL WIS2 280 Land CTRL Temps (années) WIS2 Two different IPSL-CM4 models: one with land-ice melting, the other without 0 500 70 Greenland melting impact on the THC Scenario of CO2 doubling, stabilised during 430 ans
NIS2 CTRL WIS2 Impact of the THC on global warming after 500 years WIS2 - CTRL NIS2 - CTRL Années de simulation
Density budget at the convection sites : + - with t=0 t=0 Sans-CTL Avec-CTL Feedback quantification
Main THC feedbacks Density flux of salinity THCe THCs Climate system + - Density flux of Température Dynamical gain of the THC system
CNRS project : understanding THC uncertainties in IPCC projections • Apply feedback model to « water hosing » CMIP : quantification of differences in feedback processes among IPCC models • Comparison of models with ocean « observations » in transient phase : • Last decades • Paleoclimate 8.2 event • Role played by atmospheric forcing and ocean resolution in scenarios
Models Uncertainty • Analysis of« water-hosing » = evaluate differences in ocean processes among IPCC models • Coupling ice-sheet model GREMLINS with IPSL-CM4 • Simulation of paleoclimatic event 8.2. • Representation of existing processes (feedbacks …) • Missing process : Greenland melting • Paléoclimatical constrain on IPSL-CM4 • Dynamical constrain of last 50 years • High resolution constrain on key sections High resolution simulation of last decades (MERCATOR, DRAKKAR) • OVIDE and RAPID section • Paleoclimate record of 8.2 event Observations 2 years
Models Uncertainty • NEMO with • 4 different atmospheric model • different oceanic resolution • Analysis of PMIP2 database of 8.2 event • Atmospheric forcing uncertainty • Ocean resolution impact • Paleoclimate constrain for all IPCC models • Climatic impact of THC High resolution simulation of last decades (MERCATOR, DRAKKAR) • OVIDE and RAPID section • Paleoclimate record of 8.2 event Observations 4 years
Conclusions Better evaluation of: • IPCC models against different observation datasets • Ice-sheet melting interaction with THC in IPSL-CM4 • Ocean resolution issues in coupled models with NEMO • Uncertainty related to atmospherical forcing of NEMO
Thank you mailto: didier.swingedouw@cea.fr