1 / 43

Enhancing Probation Supervision Rule for Public Safety

This training program focuses on updating probation practices and language to enhance public safety, reduce recidivism, and provide mandate relief. It incorporates evidence-based practices, improves case planning, and emphasizes quality in probation contacts.

finch
Download Presentation

Enhancing Probation Supervision Rule for Public Safety

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Part 351 of Title 9 NYCRR Probation Supervision Rule 2012 Training for Probation Directors, Supervisors, Staff Development Officers, and FPP Certified Instructors NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services Office of Probation and Correctional Alternatives DCJS Office of Probation and Correctional Alternatives OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES

  2. The Importance of Probation Supervision • Nearly 120,000 adults and 17,000 juveniles are under probation supervision on any given day-a larger number than those incarcerated in prison or under parole supervision combined. • It is the mechanism by which officers enforce the orders of the court and change offender behavior in order to reduce recidivism and enhance public safety. • It is the most visible aspect of probation that the public utilizes to measure the effectiveness of probation.

  3. Why a new Supervision Rule? Current rule: • not updated in nearly 30 years • outdated practices and language • not based in evidence • risk levels more offense focused than offender focused • focused on beginning and end stages of supervision rather than entire process

  4. Why a new Supervision Rule? Opportunities for Improvement • Enhance public safety and provide some mandate relief for counties • Incorporate evidence-based practices developed over the last two decades • Re-engineer assessment, case planning, and reassessment to support best practices throughout the entire supervision period • Re-focus ISP and PED efforts to improve supervision of high risk cases • Provide for well defined approach to administrative cases

  5. Why a new Supervision Rule?. Opportunities for Improvement • Emphasize quality not just quantity in probation contacts • Incorporate technology in probation work • Incorporate more structured graduated sanctions and rewards into probation supervision • Incorporate quality assurance/supervisory oversight

  6. Rule Revision—the Process • Workgroup started meeting monthly in January 2010, included COPA, NYSPOA, NYSAC, DCJS Legal and Research staff, DOB, Executive Chamber, and OPCA staff. Monthly meetings for almost 2 years were held. • Process was data-driven with data presented by Northpointe, Orbis Partners, and DCJS • Literature reviews were conducted via Council of State Governments and APPA documents • Other states and jurisdictions were consulted-NYS Parole, NYS OCFS, Federal Probation, Texas, Colorado, Arizona • In all, 18 draft versions were developed and reviewed

  7. Probation Supervisionis based in… • Risk Principle • Need Principle • Responsivity Principle • Program Integrity Principle

  8. DefinitionsSection 351.1 Merit credit and merit credit activities Program completion Pro-social community activities Protective factor Risk and need assessment Risk management Risk reduction Specialized assessment Stabilization period Sustained program participation Technology Victim restoration • Active vs. Administrative case • Actuarial risk • case plan • Contacts (collateral; contact substitution; home contact; in-person contact; positive home contact; probationer contact) • Criminogenic need • Educational achievement • Employment retention • Evidence-based practice • Graduated sanctions • Incentive • Interim Probation Supervision

  9. Objective and ApplicabilitySections 351.2 and 351.3 Objective 351.2 Applicability 351.3 The rule is applicable to all probation departments in NYS For family and criminal court supervision cases For interim supervision cases • What is the point of the rule? • Provide procedures • Interim Probation Supervision cases now included • Promotes evidence-based practices in probation supervision • Holds offenders accountable, improves offender competencies, restores victims • Reduces recidivism

  10. Case AssignmentSection 351.4 • No change—still three (3) business days from probation department’s official notification of disposition • Requires Probation Director or designee to: • Review case for legality of sentence and inclusion of all statutorily required conditions; and • Verify the dates of disposition or interim probation supervision • Assign to specialized caseloads, if available

  11. Assessment and Case PlanningSection 351.5 • Assessment and Case Plan process must be completed within thirty (30) business days • Assessment needs to be completed if not already completed during PSI • What is 30 business days?

  12. The AssessmentSection 351.5 (a) The Assessment: • Initial Interview: within eight (8) business days from the date of case assignment (previously was 5 days from sentence for ISP and 7 days from sentence for others) • Still allows for auxiliary personnel to conduct limited Initial Interviews • Allows for documented exceptions for cases where probationer is unavailable for Initial Interview within eight days

  13. Supervision Level AssignmentSection 351.5(b) • Risk assessment instrument shall assist with supervision level • Levels now based on Greatest Risk; High Risk; Medium Risk; and Low Risk • Case status now includes Active Cases or Administrative Cases • Over-rides must follow policy, be approved and documented • Supervision requirement while pending assessment is in-person contact every week

  14. Supervision Level AssignmentSection 351.5(c) All applicable legal case requirements must be met at this time: • DNA sample • SORA status compliance • Fingerprints • Restitution

  15. Case PlanningSection 351.5(d) • Case plan shall be based primarily on information from assessment/s • Case plan must include efforts to engage probationer and/or family • Case plan must be focused on remediation of behavior giving rise to complaint (charge) • Case plan must address identified risk and needs, and include protective factors and strengths • Case plan is the road map for probation supervision—outlines how conditions of probation will be achieved

  16. Case PlanningSection 351.5(d) cont. Case planning should include: • Feedback to probationer of assessment results • Use of Motivational Interviewing styles and skills • Analysis of probationer level of motivation • Matching motivation level to case plan goals/strategies • Long term goals (achievable by end of probation); short term goals (achievable by next reassessment); and action steps (achievable by next appointment with Probation Officer) • Identified roles and responsibilities of those involved in case plan

  17. Probation SupervisionSection 351.6 • Balance between risk management and risk reduction • What is risk management? • What is risk reduction? • Active or Administrative case status?

  18. New Risk Levels • Greatest Risk • High Risk • Medium Risk • Low Risk

  19. Required Contacts • In Person Contact requires the physical presence of the probationer • Probationer Contact requires a visual contact with the probationer (allows for real-time technology) • Collateral Contact requires a third party verification of probationer information • Positive Home Contact requires the physical presence of the probationer during the home contact • Home Contact is a contact at the probationer’s home without the physical presence of the probationer

  20. Probation SupervisionSection 351.6 (a) (1-4) Contacts for Greatest Risk • 6 probationer contacts per month, with a minimum of 1 in-person contact per week and 2 probationer contacts per month • 6 collateral contacts per month-related to criminogenic needs • 1 positive home contact each month from case assignment—a positive home contact counts as an in-person contact Contacts for High Risk • 1 in-person contact per week • 6 collateral contacts per quarter—related to criminogenic needs • 1 positive home contact during the 1st month from case assignment-thereafter, 3 home contacts per quarter, 2 of which must be positive home contacts—a positive home contact counts as an in-person contact

  21. Probation SupervisionSection 351.6 (a) (1-4) Contacts for Medium Risk • 2 probationer contacts per month, with a minimum of 1 in-person contact per month • 2 collateral contacts per quarter—related to criminogenic needs • 1 positive home contact during 1st 45 days from case assignment—a positive home contact counts as an in-person contact Contacts for Low Risk • 1 contact per month • Collateral contacts as needed • Home contacts as needed

  22. Stabilization Period • Stabilization period means the first three (3) months of juvenile probation supervision and three-six (3-6) months of adult probation supervision as a Greatest Risk or High Risk probationer during which the probationer is assessed for compliance with the conditions of probation and the case plan. • Stabilization periods are not necessary for Medium and Low Risk cases, as by definition, they are relatively stable. • Stabilization period is the minimum amount of time during which the probation officer is able to assess the probationer for compliance before Merit Credit may be considered

  23. Merit Credit Eligibility • Merit credit means a protocol by which Greatest Risk, High Risk or Medium Risk probationers, who are in compliance with their conditions of probation and achieving their case plan goals, may be considered for a reduction in contacts by their probation officer, or eligible for other forms of incentives as determined by local probation departments. Merit credits reflect sustained and measurable achievement and must be documented in the case file. • Merit credit activities are defined as victim restoration measures, employment retention, educational achievement, sustained program participation, program completion, or pro-social community activities. Merit credit activities are directly related to the probationer’s identified criminogenic needs, conditions of probation and case plan.

  24. Merit Credit Activities • Educational Achievement is measurable and documented educational or vocational achievement • Employment Retention is sustaining documented employment • Program Completion is documentation of completing all program requirements • Pro-Social Community Activities must be extended, consistent participation that can be measured and documented • Sustained Program Participation must have consistent attendance and meaningful participation that can be documented • Victim Restoration Measures can include restitution, community service, apology letters, other restorative practices and must also be documented

  25. Stabilization Period and Merit Credit Eligibility-how it works • For Greatest Risk: Following the stabilization period (3 months for juveniles and 3-6 months for adults), and if the probationer is compliant with the conditions of probation and case plan, and there is documentation of merit credit activities, the probationer may be credited with up to a maximum of 1 probationer contact per month on an on-going basis unless rescinded. Merit credit activities are defined as the following: (1) Victim Restoration Measures; (2) Employment Retention; (3) Educational Achievement; (4) Sustained Program Participation; (5) Program Completion; or (6) Pro-Social Community Activities. • For High Risk: Following the stabilization period (3 months for juveniles and 3-6 months for adults), and if the probationer is compliant with the conditions of probation and case plan, and there is documentation of merit credit activities, the probationer may be credited with up to a maximum of 1 in-person contact per month on an on-going basis unless rescinded. Merit credit activities are defined as the following: (1) Victim Restoration Measures; (2) Employment Retention; (3) Educational Achievement; (4) Sustained Program Participation; (5) Program Completion; or (6) Pro-Social Community Activities.

  26. Stabilization Period and Merit Credit Eligibility-how it works • For Medium Risk: Documentation of the following may be credited toward up to 1 probationer contact per month. Merit credit activities are defined as the following: (1) Victim Restoration Measures; (2) Employment Retention; (3) Educational Achievement; (4) Sustained Program Participation; (5) Program Completion or (6) Pro-Social Community Activities. • For Low Risk: No merit credit may be applied to the one contact per month that is statutorily required.

  27. Probation SupervisionSection 351.6 (b) Juvenile Contact Substitution The intent is not to reduce quantity of contacts but to restructure contacts to support the juvenile and his/her family while engaged in short-term community based evidence based treatment programs

  28. Probation SupervisionSection 351.6 (b) Juvenile Contact Substitution • Available at the discretion of the department • Applies only to JD and PINS cases under age 18 at time of disposition • Lasts no longer than 6 months • Requires participation in a community-based program which is evidence-based (program must be known and approved by the department and effective in addressing criminogenic needs) • Allows for substitution of up to 50% of required contacts with probation officer by community-based program • One of the required collateral contacts by probation officer must be with the community-based program that is making the substitute contact

  29. Probation SupervisionSection 351.6 (c) Administrative Cases Can include cases with any assigned supervision level who are unavailable for Active Supervision Contacts for Administrative Cases 1 Contact per month (specific contacts allowed for absconder cases) Types of Administrative Cases include: • Absconders • Hospitalization • Interstate cases • Incarcerated • Residential program • ICE cases

  30. Probation SupervisionSection 351.6 (d) Periodic Reassessment/Case Reviews • Purpose is redefined to ‘reassess probationer progress (or lack of) in achieving the goals identified in the case plan and his/her compliance with conditions of probation’ • Allows for objective, quantitative input into case planning decisions • For Active juvenile Family Court cases-every three (3) months • For Active Criminal Court cases and adult Family Court cases-every six (6) months • For Administrative Cases-every twelve (12) months

  31. Probation SupervisionSection 351.6 (d) cont. Periodic Reassessment/Case Reviews Step One: • Reassess using reassessment/case review instrument—the initial provides a baseline point to measure against • Review compliance with contact requirements • Review Merit Credit activities, if applicable • Review compliance with conditions of probation and case plan achievement

  32. Probation SupervisionSection 351.6 (d) cont. Periodic Reassessment/Case Reviews Step Two: Consider the case for the following possible options: • Case Plan modification? • Reclassification to another supervision level? • Conditions of Probation modification? • Merit Credit eligibility, where applicable?

  33. Probation Supervision PracticesSection 351.7 (a-f) Specific probation supervision practices include: (a) Victims Services (restitution, notification, information, referrals for assistance) (b) Probationer Referrals (probation officer role in addressing resistance; matching probationer to program; higher risk probationers referred to higher intensity programs; providing assessment information to program) (c) Risk Management (monitoring probationer activities; reviewing conditions of probation; documentation)

  34. Probation SupervisionSection 351.7 (d) cont. Specific probation supervision practices include: (d) Risk Reduction (use of assessment information; monitoring achievements and challenges in case plan; using incentives; using Merit Credits; using graduated sanctions; swift and certain graduated responses; modifying Conditions of Probation) (e) Technology (Ignition Interlock, GPS, computers, video-conference, electronic monitoring) should be used to enhance supervision, not replace (f) Supervisory Directives (use of written departmental policies giving specific instructions for probationers to follow)

  35. Inter- and Intra- State transfersSection 351.8 • State Laws • OPCA Rule 349 • Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision (ICAOS) • Interstate Compact for Juveniles (ICJ) • Review of compliance with conditions of probation and case plan goals • Waiver of extradition signed

  36. Termination of SentenceSection 351.9 Early Termination/Early Discharge • When ‘probationer is no longer in need of such guidance, training or other assistance which would otherwise be administered through probation services’ and • When ‘probationer has diligently complied with the terms and conditions of sentence of probation’ and • ‘the termination of the sentence of probation is not adverse to the protection of the public or the victim/s’

  37. Case ClosingSection 351.10 Case Closing options include: • Termination of Sentence (ET/ED) • Maximum Expiration (ME) • Revocation • Complete intrastate transfer • Death • Other (DOCCS; federal custody)

  38. Reporting RequirementsSection 351.11 Probation departments must report any and all information requested to the Commissioner of DCJS

  39. Patricia.Donohue@DCJS.ny.gov 518-485-5168

More Related