70 likes | 225 Views
Conclusion for “Elements of Grading”. Wednesday, October 17, 2012 Principals’ Meeting Jasper County School District Dr. Vashti K. Washington, Superintendent Dr. Arthur L. Holmes, Facilitator. A Quick Review. Chapter 1 – Grading Is Feedback Chapter 2 – The Grading Debate
E N D
Conclusion for “Elements of Grading” Wednesday, October 17, 2012 Principals’ Meeting Jasper County School District Dr. Vashti K. Washington, Superintendent Dr. Arthur L. Holmes, Facilitator
A Quick Review • Chapter 1 – Grading Is Feedback • Chapter 2 – The Grading Debate • Chapter 3 – How To Improve Accuracy in Grading • Chapter 4 – How To Improve Fairness in Grading
A Quick Review Continues….. • Chapter 5 – How to Improve Specificity in Grading • Chapter 6 – How to Improve Timeliness in Grading • Chapter 7 – Time-Saving Strategies for Busy Teachers • Chapter 8 – Leading Change for Effective Grading Practices
Group 1 When beginning a discussion of grading policy, why is it best to begin with an explicit vision? Activity: Create a poster that delivers this message to parents.
Group 2 What are the differences between an explicit and an implicit evaluation system for teachers and administrators? How do these differences make the case for systemic alignment of change initiatives? Activity: Create a graph showing the difference between “explicit” and “implicit” evaluation.
Group 3 What issues do special education students present with regard to the four criteria for effective grades—accuracy, fairness, specificity, and timeliness? Activity: List some issues under each criteria.
Something to Think About Questions and Concerns