400 likes | 788 Views
Study on synchronization of coupled oscillators using the Fokker-Planck equation. H.Sakaguchi Kyushu University, Japan. Fokker-Planck equation: important equation in statistical physics Synchronization in coupled oscillators. Langevin equation. Stochastic differential equation
E N D
Study on synchronization of coupled oscillators using the Fokker-Planck equation H.Sakaguchi Kyushu University, Japan Fokker-Planck equation: important equation in statistical physics Synchronization in coupled oscillators
Langevin equation Stochastic differential equation Time evolution in a noisy environment Langevin equation X(t): a stochastic variable such as a position or a membrane potential ξ(t):a random force, Gaussian white noise
Random forces Gaussian: The probability distribution function is Gaussian with average 0 and variance 2D. White: There is no time correlation. Consider a large number of independent stochastic variableswhich obey the Langevin eq. The stochastic variables are randomly distributed, since the random forces are different.
Fokker-Planck equation Consider the probability density P(x,t) that the stochastic variable takes a value x. P obeys the Fokker-Planck equation Drift term Diffusion term The probability density drifts with velocity F(x)and diffuses owing to the random force
Random walk Langevin equation No drift force Fokker-Planck equation
Ornstein-Ulenbeck process Brownian motion of a small particle such as a pollen on water surface Linear force (v: velocity,- kv viscous force) Fokker-Planck equation Stationary distribution Maxwell distribution
Thermal equilibrium distribution Potential force Fokker-Planck equation D=kBT; T: Temperature Thermal equilibrium distribution No probability flow: Detailed balance
Fokker-Planck equation for coupled Langevin equations Coupled Langevin equations for two variables Fokker-Planck equation for P(x,y)
Synchronization of coupled biological oscillators Synchronization of flashing of fireflies. Synchronization of cell activity in suprachiasmaticnucleus which control the circadian rhythms Sleep spindle waves are brain waves which appear in the second stage of sleep. Spindle waves are created by synchronous firing of inhibitory neurons in thalamus. (Steriade et al.) Human EEG
Phase oscillators Limit cycle oscillation Phase description: phase variables Two-coupled phase oscillators Mutual Entrainment
Globally coupled noisy phase oscillators Mean field coupling: Each oscillator interacts with all other oscillators by the same coupling. Order parameter <sin(φ)>=0by the symmetry P(φ): The probability that the phase takes φ Uniform state σ=0,P=1/2π Unstablefor K>2D
Self-Consistent Method Order parameter
Order-Disorder transition Weak interaction, Large noise Phases are randomly distributed. Disordered phase. Strong interaction, small noise Phases gather together. <cos(φ)> is nonzero. Ordered state Order-Disorder transition Phase transition from ferromagnetism to paramagentism If a magnet is heated above a critical temperature, the magnetism disappears.
Globally coupled oscillators with different frequencies Phase oscillator model Kuramoto model
Globally coupled oscillators with different frequencies and external noises g(ω): Distribution of the natural frequency ω
Stationary solution of the Fokker-Planck equation for nonzero ω Flow of probability: average circulation of phase Stationary but non-equilibrium distribution
Phase transition via synchronization Complete entrainment is impossible owing to noises
Integrate-and-fire model Hodgkin-Huxley equation Detailed dynamics of membrane potential and several ion channels IF model simplest model of the neural firing x:membrane potential
Synchronization of two IF neurons Instantaneous interaction Response time 0 Complete synchronization for t>80 δx=x1-x2
Noisy integrate-and-fire model and the Fokker-Planck equation reset process
Stochastic resonance in the noisy IF model Stochastic resonance Response of excitable systems to periodic force + noises Response is maximum for intermediate strength of noise
Direct simulation of the Fokker-Planck equation D=0.005,0.0015 b=1.1,e=0.05 Oscillation of P Oscillation of J0 Firing rate
Phase transition in a globally coupled IF models τ:response time b=0.8,D=0.215,g=0.6,τ=0.01 Oscillation amplitude vs. D Disorder Order
Phase transition in a nonlocally coupled IF model Synaptic coupling is nonlocal. Synaptic current at y is determined by the firing rate at y’ by the integral. Nonlocal interaction Maxican-hat type Excitatory in the neighborhood Inhibitory in far regions
Propagating pulse states Uniform state is unstable Pulse propagation D=0.01 Oscillation amplitude of I(y,t) J0(y,t) Order-disorder phase transion from a uniform state to a traveling wave state Inhibitory interaction suppresses global synchronization
Another IF model and inhibitory network Thalamus(thalamic reticular neurons) Synchronization occurs among inhibitory neurons. Synchronization between two inhibitory IF neurons is possible if the response time τtakes a suitable value. Another IF model including the dynamics of excited state V>VT Excited state V1 VT2 VT V2
Two IF neurons with inhibitory coupling Synchronization of two inhibitory IF neurons K=0.5,V0=-18 -Is inhibitory synapse V1 and V2 are synchronized Synchronization becomes easier owing to finite duration of excited state
Phase transition in globally coupled IF models with mutual inhibition Langevin equation Fokker-Planck equation
Oscillatory phase transition in inhibitory systems Oscillation amplitude vs. K Phase diagram τ D=0.2,τ=20 D=0.2 Finite response time is preferable for global oscillation
Two types of oscillation Time evolution of P at K=2,D=0.2 Time evolution of P at K=10,D=0.2 Fokker-Planck equation Vi and the averageat K=2, D=0.2 Vi and the average at K=10, D=0.2 Langevin equation of 1000 neurons Oscillation is synchronized. Firing is not synchronized. Synchronized firing The firing of some neurons suppresses the firing of the other neurons
Integrate-and-fire-or-burst model Low threshold Ca2+ current: IT(t) plays important role for thalamic neurons This current flows for a short time after the potential V goes over Vh .
Phase transition in globally coupled IFB models with mutual inhibition h(t) is a stochastic variable.
Bistability of globally coupled IFB model Average membrane potential E(t) <h(t)> vs.I0. I0=1.6,K=40, D=0.2 and τ=20. Vh=-70 I0 is external input h≠0, in one mode (rebound mode, burst mode). h=0, and IT does not work, in another mode (tonic mode). Two modes are bistable for 0.55<I0<2.2
Summary 1 Phase transition via mutual synchronization 2 Direct simulation of Fokker-Planck equation 3 Phase oscillator model and IF models 4 Transition to traveling wave states 5 Mutual synchronization in inhibitory systems Intermittent firing in strongly inhibited systems
Discussions and Problems Good points of the Fokker-Planck equation: 1. Stationary distribution might be solved. 2. Numerical results are clear, since it is a deterministic equation. Weak points of the Fokker-Planck equation: If the number of stochastic variables is not one or two, numerical simulations are rather hard. Langevin simulations may be efficient for realistic equations such as noisy Hodgkin-Huxley equations.
References Y.Kuramoto, “Chemical Oscillations, Waves and Turbulence” Springer (Berlin, 1984). H.Sakaguchi, Prog.Theor.Phys. Vol.79(1988) 39 S.H.Strogatz, Physica D Vol. 143 (2000) 1. H.Sakaguchi, Phys.Rev. E Vol.70(2004) 022901. M.Steriade and R.R.Llinas, Phsiol.Rev. Vol.68 (1988) 649