260 likes | 409 Views
Sue Gregory. Audit of IT Systems SARQA / DKG Scandinavian Conference, October 2002, Copenhagen. Purpose of IT System Audit. To assure that established standards are met for all phases of the validation, operation and maintenance of computerised systems.
E N D
Sue Gregory Audit of IT SystemsSARQA / DKG Scandinavian Conference, October 2002, Copenhagen
Purpose of IT System Audit • To assure that established standards are met for all phases of the validation, operation and maintenance of computerised systems. • To monitor the GxP compliance of computerised systems. Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Types of IT System Audit • "Spot Check" – not an audit in its own right, but conducted as part of a facilities-type audit • Vertical – (specific) looks at defined elements in great depth • Horizontal – (general) looks at the entire system but in less depth Or maybe combination – review of the entire system in general and then specific elements in depth Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
IT System Audit - Auditor Requirements • Auditing skills • Knowledge of applicable regulations and regulatory expectations • Knowledge of computer system validation process • Knowledge of software development life cycle (SDLC) • Technical IT skills / knowledge Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Some applicable regulations and references • GLP Consensus document, The application of the principles of GLP to computerised systems, environment monograph 116, OECD 1995 • Rules governing medicinal products in the European Community, Volume 4 Annex 11, computerised systems, Eudralex. • 21 CFR part 11 Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures, Final Rule, FDA 1997 • Guidance for Industry, Computerized Systems used in Clinical Trials, FDA 1999. Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Some applicable regulations and references • PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Technical Report No 31 – Validation and Qualification of Computerized Laboratory Data Acquisition Systems, 1999 supplement, Volume 53, Number 4 • GAMP guide for validation of automated systems in Pharmaceutical Manufacture, version 4, GAMP forum, 2001 • International Standard, ISO/IEC 12207 – Information Technology – Software life cycle processes, 1995 and amendment 1, 2002 • Guidance for industry, General principles of software validation; final guidance for Industry and FDA staff, FDA, 2002 Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Some applicable regulations and references • And of course: • Any relevant internal policies, guidelines and procedures Bear in mind that the area is evolving and new interpretations are frequent. Monitor the literature and relevant websites for current developments, e.g.: • FDA warning letters, GMP trends etc • www.crsc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/index.html • www.pda.org/techdocs/index.html • www.groups.yahoo.com/group/21cfrpart11/messages Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
IT System Audit Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Skills vs System compliance level Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Technical Skills vs System Compliance Level Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Software Development considerations • Same standards apply to purchased software and software developed in-house • Documented SDLC; followed • Documented specification of requirements for the system; fully traceable • Documented specifications of functionality and design; fully traceable • Documented standards for coding; followed • Documented testing by supplier; unit, integration and system level Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Approach to IT system "Spot Check" • Determine implementation date • Ascertain whether there is a validation report, check date, authorisation and conclusion • Ascertain whether there is a log of changes since the implementation date • Obtain a list of SOPs related to the system, ascertain that these are authorised and cover use, maintenance, ……… etc. Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Horizontal IT audit - basics • User / System Requirements Specification “It is not possible to validate software without predetermined and documented software requirements” FDA, principles of software validation, 2002 • Authorised (internally) and chronologically correct • Precise requirements covering all functions the system will perform • Uniquely identified • Verifiable Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Horizontal IT audit - basics • Traceability • Check that each requirement is traceable through the subsequent specifications and tests • Is there evidence that each requirement has been addressed? Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Horizontal IT audit - basics • Validation Plan “The validation must be conducted in accordance with a documented protocol”FDA, principles of software validation, 2002 • Authorised and chronologically correct • Describes who does what and when • Describes or references how Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Horizontal IT audit - basics • User Testing • Test Plan • Test acceptance criteria • Test records • Final test report • Ensure the system can properly perform its intended functions • Ensure the users can understand and use the system Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Horizontal IT audit - basics • Validation Report • Authorised and chronologically correct • Summarises the validation exercise • Describes deviations and errors encountered • Includes clear statement of success or otherwise of validation Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Horizontal IT audit - basics • Authorised operating procedures covering: • Maintenance and repair • Disaster recovery • Security • Back-up and restore • Administration • Periodic review • Data collection and handling • Change and configuration management • Evidence of their implementation Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Horizontal IT audit - basics • Training • Staff involved in the validation • Staff involved in routine use of the system • Staff involved in development and maintenance of the system Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Additional considerations • Vendor Audit • Installation • Development Processes • Internal IT department Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Additional considerations • Vendor Audit (software development) • ISO Quality Systems • SDLC Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Additional considerations • Development Processes • Coding – written standards, followed • Code review – pre-planned, documented • Unit tests – owned by developers, documented • Configuration management • Testing: • Test Strategy • Test Plan, scripts, cases • Error reporting • Release procedure • User documentation (help files, user manual etc) Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Additional considerations • Installation • IT department SOP • Protocol, pre-approved and followed • Records • Report Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Additional considerations • Internal IT Department processes • Installation • Change Control • Security • Training • Document control etc. Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
Practice makes perfect….. • Start small • Define audit’s scope • Allow plenty of time • Start with the general requirements • Focus on the words audit and system Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002
….start practising! Sue Gregory, Genmab A/S, October 2002