1 / 13

Sentinel Lakes Program: Water quality monitoring and assessment

Sentinel Lakes Program: Water quality monitoring and assessment. Steve Heiskary, Research Scientist III Environmental Analysis and Outcomes Division Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Outline. Lake assessment approach What do we know about these lakes?

flann
Download Presentation

Sentinel Lakes Program: Water quality monitoring and assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sentinel Lakes Program: Water quality monitoring and assessment Steve Heiskary, Research Scientist III Environmental Analysis and Outcomes Division Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

  2. Outline • Lake assessment approach • What do we know about these lakes? • Data analysis examples – variability and trends; • Plan for 2008-2009; • Collaboration with MDNR staff on reporting • Summary

  3. Proposed Sentinel Lakes: MPCA data & reporting summary

  4. Sentinel Lakes Baseline Monitoring effort • Split effort between summers of 2008 and 2009 (need to coordinate with other MPCA monitoring priorities); • Anticipate baseline reports for 2008 lakes ready by spring 2009 and 2009 lakes by 2010; • MPCA staff take lead in monitoring and report writing; • Monitoring coordinated with area fisheries office and other local partners as appropriate;

  5. Trends and Inter-annual Variability • Provide some simple analysis of trends and variability in trophic status for select lakes; • Note the need for good quality data & potential problems when mixing data from several laboratories; • Example of sediment-diatom inferred TP as a basis for assessing trends

  6. Hill Lake, Aitkin County. Example of apparent trend (total record) & variability (recent record). Large break in record. Transparency consistently lower in South Basin.

  7. Lake Peltier – Rice Creek Chain: Anoka County. No trends & modest variability over time, ~0.24 m on average (26% of long-term average)

  8. Lake Carlos – Douglas Co.: Assessing trends & year-to-year variability: No trend in TP, however variability is high. Is this real or a function of laboratory detection limits, multiple labs, outliers???

  9. Portage Lake – Hubbard County: Increase in TP & decline in Secchi in recent years

  10. St. Olaf Lake – Waseca County: High variability in Secchi for a small lake – 23% on average (typical 10-20%). [Residuals are long-term mean- annual mean.]

  11. Lake Shaokatan, Lincoln County: Use of sediment cores & diatom reconstruction of TP

  12. Sentinel Lakes additions: • April-October, monthly • Add cations and anions • Work with Fisheries for up to date characterization of the fisheries & management; • Work with Waters to describe water level record & trends; • Macrophyte assessment? • Trends: Secchi, TP & chl-a based on existing data, characterize variability; • Modeling – MINLEAP & BATHTUB as appropriate • Provide recommendations for frequency of monitoring & other data needs for lake.

  13. Summary • Reviewed proposed Sentinel lakes & data availability for each. Lakes selected range from Carlos and Peltier with data collected over the course 20-30 years to Net & Northern Light for which we have no data – Implications as we move forward? • Trend analysis will require extensive attention to quality assurance of data & ideally a single laboratory will be used for this work; • MPCA (Lakes & Streams Unit) proposes to sample each of the sentinel lakes over the course of one open-water season (April – October) during 2008 – 2009; • We will integrate this work with our projected (mandated) monitoring activities and with existing budget & staff; • We will write LAP-type reports that will serve to provide a baseline for each of the lakes; • These reports will provide a sound basis for deciding the frequency & intensity of future monitoring, which candidates may be best for more detailed analysis, and should serve to help shape future proposals for the Sentinel Lakes program. • Successful implementation of the Sentinel Lakes program will require having a clear vision of purpose, communicating that vision and developing extensive partnerships.

More Related