390 likes | 407 Views
This plan outlines the condition of the facilities, capacity, and changing educational needs in the Ohio School Facilities Commission. It includes committee work, forums, recommendations, and updates on the facilities plan. The goal is to improve conditions for teaching and learning while staying on budget and on time.
E N D
FACILITIES - 2000 Condition of the Facilities Capacity of the Facilities Changing Educational Needs
STATE ASSISTANCE AND BOARD COMMITTEE Ohio School Facilities Commission Board of Education Committee
COMMITTEE WORK Fact Finding and Data Gathering Create Public Forms Expert Input School Visits
COMMITTEE STRUCTURESubcommittees Early Childhood/Grade Configuration School Size/Sites Renovate/Replace
FORUMS AND RECOMMENDATION • Two Forums • Recommendations • Maintaining one high school using renovation and replacement • Moving from three middle schools to two (both new) • Moving from ten elementary schools to seven using renovation and replacement (with a possible move to fewer in the future)
PHASE II – FACILITIES PLAN Renovate Emerson and Horace Mann Middle Schools into elementary schools Renovate the west wing of Lakewood High School
IMPROVED CONDITIONS FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING Maintained neighborhood schools Increased size of classrooms Installed advanced technology Built specialized spaces for science, music, etc. Provided space for preschool and extended day kindergarten Consolidated students to eliminate split classes Created more program equity among middle schools
Rick Berdine’s Slides Begin Here
OSFC FACILITIES PLAN UPDATE One High School Two Middle Schools Six Elementary Schools
OSFC FACILITIES PLAN UPDATE OSFC Funding of $46.8 million available if Facilities Plan is completed Phase III will be funded by OSFC and local share Phase III bond issue amounts and millage will be determined by ultimate cost of construction for number of buildings decided by the committee and as approved by the Board of Education
Dr. Don Dyck Consultant Planning Advocates Inc.
PLANNING ADVOCATES • Focus: futures forecasting, educational programming, facility planning, consensus building • Consulting services based on field experience and successful practice • Our consensus-building process is specific: • Relies on listening, dialogue, consensus-building • Honors both community and school interests • Capitalizes on skilled facilitation • Proposes best alternative(s) “owned” by community members
COMMITTEE PURPOSE Develop consensus and commitment to an updated plan for Lakewood school facilities - not to enforce our preconceived notions of a personal solution
APPROACH Authentic, inclusive community and school participation Pertinent, credible data Skillful facilitation: consultant, Phase 3 Committee members Consensus-based progression Program-driven within practical parameters— financial capacity and prudent implementation of long range facilities vision
BUILDING CONSENSUS Requires framing a proposal after listening carefully to credible data and others’ concerns Expectation is that no one will ask anyone else to undermine his/her community interests Responsibility of everyone is to come to consensus conclusions for educating future students
FACILITATING CONSENSUS Engages all members in a useful dialogue that contributes to consensus Includes the participation of all members in reaching the consensus Seeks nearly unanimous commitment concerning the consensus statement
PROCESS Analyze critical information and identify essential issues for community dialogue Forum I—Confirm priority issuesunderlying changes, programs, facilities and costs Identify viable optionsbased on community consensus priorities Forum II—Establish community consensus options for resolving priority issues Proposal with rationale
FACILITATED COMMUNITYFORUM I Open forum context Present vision and critical planning data Dialogue stakeholders on important issues Dialogue within small facilitated groups Purpose: awareness, understanding, common ground, consensus on issues
ASSESSING VIABLE OPTIONS Based on vision and critical planning data Grounded in consensus forum results; NOT just the majority of all responses Results from consensus building among the committee members Leads to proposed alternative future options Strategic in nature
FACILITATED COMMUNITYFORUM II Same open forum context Present vision and alternative future options Facilitate small groups re: options Report consensus of small groups Purpose: seek large group consensus for preferred alternative(s)
RESULTS Baseline data analyzed Significant community involvement: Phase 3 Committee and community-at-large at forums Consensus on critical issues and preferred alternative(s) to resolve the issue(s) Skilled facilitation, dialogue and civility—Trust the Process Lakewood facilities plan proposal: program-driven within established parameters
SMALL GROUP-LARGE GROUP • Issue: need outpaces capacity or expectation • Table discussion: • Facilitator • Recorder/reporter (can be same as facilitator) • Issues facing Lakewood regarding long range facilities plan and available resources • Large group “report out” of top 3 issues
COMMITTEE ORGANIZATION • Communications • Recruit and promote attendance at forums • Coordinate logistics/materials • Data • Salient information summary (handout) • Forum presentations • Dialogue • Discussion guide (survey and response) • Small group/large group reporting