2011 Higher Education Government Relations Conference December 2, 2011

1. Boosting Student Success Amidst the State-to-Student Cost Shift in Financing Public Higher Education 2011 Higher Education Government Relations Conference December 2, 2011 Aaron Thompson Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs Kentucky Council on Postsecondary Education

2. Unraveling the Issue • The focus of the future of postsecondary education is complex and one that is misunderstood by traditional students, non-traditional students, colleges, and universities.

3. Increased Enrollment • Substantial enrollment growth for students of all ages and backgrounds has taken place. • The focus must be on student success and not just access.

4. Total undergraduate enrollment in degree-granting postsecondary institutions increased from 7.4 million students in fall 1970 to 13.2 million in fall 2000 and 17.6 million in fall 2009. Source: National Center for Education Statistics Condition of Education 2011

5. Increased Enrollment • Between 2003 – 2004, enrollment increased by more than 17% in programs that require less than two years, 22% in two-four year programs, and 14% in programs requiring four or more years. • A significant number of these students are minorities.

6. The percentage of high school graduates immediately enrolling in postsecondary education by race/ethnicity and income. Source: National Center for Education Statistics Condition of Education 2011

7. Percentage of Enrollment in degree-granting institutions, by race/ethnicity Selected years, fall 1976–2009 Source: National Center for Education Statistics Condition of Education 2011

8. College Completion has been elevated to the National Agenda Twenty years ago, the U.S. had the best educated population in the world. In 2009, we were tenth. Now our nation is tied for twelfth in the world and declining. Increasing educational attainment is imperative for the economic recovery and future economic growth of the nation. The Obama administration’s higher education agenda is focused on increasing college completion and returning America to its previous position of having the most educated population in the world by 2025.

9. Percentage of population that has attained postsecondary education by age group (2009)

10. Student Success • For-profit colleges have addressed the need of access, yet there are great strides to be made in the area of student success. • What about the Publics?

11. Student Success • The number of degrees conferred by for-profit institutions increased at a faster rate than in non-profit institutions. • For-profit institutions awarded 5% of all bachelor’s degrees in 2008-2009 and 10% of all master’s degrees.

12. Student Success • Retention and graduation rates are lower at four-year, for-profit colleges compared to non-profit colleges. • However, two-year, for-profit colleges saw higher retention rates than their non-profit counterparts.

13. For Profit vs. Non-Profit Schools

14. Percentage of Certificate /Associate Degree Earned by Race/Ethnicity Source: National Center for Education Statistics Condition of Education 2011

15. Percentage of Bachelors Degree Attainment by Race/Ethnicity Source: National Center for Education Statistics Condition of Education 2011

16. Percent Who Took Remedial Courses by Number of Courses and Race/Ethnicity 2007-2008

17. WHAT MAKES A STUDENT SUCCESSFUL?

18. Research-Based Principles of College Success • Research on human learning and student development indicates four powerful principles of college success (Cuseo, Fecas & Thompson, 2010): • Active Involvement; • Use of Campus Resources; • Interpersonal Interaction and Collaboration; and • Personal Reflection and Self-Awareness (Astin, 1993; Kuh, 2000; Light, 2001; Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991, 2005; Tinto, 1993).

19. Active Involvement • Research indicates that active involvement may be the most powerful principle of human learning and college success (Astin, 1993; Kuh, 2000). • Involves the following pair of processes: • The amount of personal time devoted to learning in the college experience; • The degree of personal effort or energy (mental and physical) put into the learning process.

20. Interpersonal Interaction and Collaboration • Four particular forms of interpersonal interaction have been found to be strongly associated with student learning and motivation in college: • Student-faculty interaction • Student-advisor interaction • Student-mentor interaction • Student-student (peer) interaction

21. Interaction with Faculty Members • Studies repeatedly show that college success is influenced heavily by the quality and quantity of student-faculty interaction outside the classroom. Such contact is positively associated with the following positive outcomes for college students: • Improved academic performance; • Increased critical thinking skills; • Greater satisfaction with the college experience; • Increased likelihood of completing a college degree; and • Stronger desire to seek education beyond college (Astin, 1993; Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991, 2005).

22. …And good state Policy

23. What can be done at a policy level to increase to Student Success • There are many but two foci could jump start the process: 1) Gap Closing and 2) the adult learner • i.e., Gap = differential in college completion for underprepared, underrepresented, and low income • Adult learner = citizens 25-64 yrs. of age with some some college but no baccalaureate degree

28. Students and Remedial Courses • One third of first year students entering college in the 2007-2008 academic year enrolled in at least one remedial course. • For community colleges, the number increases to 42%.

29. Students and College Readiness • In October 2009, the Department of Education reported that many states declare students have grade-level mastery in reading and math when this is not the case. • A 2007 ACT National Curriculum Survey of college professors found that 65% of college professors maintain their states poorly prepare students for college-level coursework.

30. Students and Remedial Courses • One third of first year students entering college in the 2007-2008 academic year enrolled in at least one remedial course. • For community colleges, the number increases to 42%.

31. Students and College Readiness • In October 2009, the Department of Education reported that many states declare students have grade-level mastery in reading and math when this is not the case. • A 2007 ACT National Curriculum Survey of college professors found that 65% of college professors maintain their states poorly prepare students for college-level coursework.

32. Student Engagement • Research shows that students who are academically underprepared are more engaged with their college experience than their academically prepared peers. • Students who are academically underprepared are more likely to: discuss career plans, work harder, prepare multiple drafts of a paper before submission, and write more papers and reports.

33. In the U.S., more than 59 million people, or 30 percent of the adult population, are untouched by postsecondary education—and in 35 states, more than 60 percent of the population does not have an associate’s degree or higher. • Over 26 million adults in the U.S. currently have no high school diploma, more than 32 million have not ȃ attended college and are earning less than a living wage, and over 8 million have not attended college and speak little or no English. Overlaps among these populations are substantial. For example, more than three million individuals have all three of these characteristics: they do not have a high school diploma, they earn less than a living wage, and they speak little or no English. • Council for Adult and Experiential Learning (CAEL), with funding from Lumina Foundation for Education and in partnership with the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS), 2008

34. Affordability: Community college attendance is relatively affordable for the nation’s adults, but private college attendance is likely out of reach for many. Average tuition and fees at a public community college constitute 7 percent of median income for the poorest 25- to 44-year-olds and 5.4 percent of median income for the poorest 45- to 64-year-olds. Public four year college tuition and fees constitute 19.5 percent of median income for the poorest 25- to 44-year-olds and 15 percent of median income for the poorest 45- to 64-year-olds. In contrast, private college tuition and fees constitute more than 70 percent of median income for the poorest 25- to 44- year-olds and more than 54 percent of median income for the poorest 45- to 64-year-olds. • States vary widely in their support for part-time students. Seventeen states do not provide any need-based aid to part-time students, and another eighteen states devote less than 10 percent of need-based aid funds to part-timers. But nine states devote between 10 percent and 20 percent of need-based aid to part-time students and six devote more than 20 percent of need-based aid funds to this group. • Council for Adult and Experiential Learning (CAEL), with funding from Lumina Foundation for Education and in partnership with the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS), 2008

35. Accessibility:Nontraditional students—for example, those who have delayed enrollment in postsecondary education, work full-time while enrolled, or have dependents other than a spouse—were more likely than traditional students both to participate in distance education and to be in programs available entirely through distance education. • Council for Adult and Experiential Learning (CAEL), with funding from Lumina Foundation for Education and in partnership with the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS), 2008

36. Kentucky has approximately half a million working-age adults who have been to college but not received a bachelor’s degree. • There are about 400,000 working-age adults who do not have a high school diploma or GED. • Policy initiative “Project Graduate” started in 2007 (focused on KY citizens who had 90 college credit hours or more) and has graduated approximately 700 students.

37. Increased Enrollment for Adult Learners • The most dramatic growth in undergraduate enrollment during the first decade of the 21st century has occurred at for-profit colleges. • For-profit institutions are more likely to enroll students age 25 and older and in distance education such as online learning. • Nearly 1 in 5 students enrolled in for-profit institutions are enrolled entirely in distance education.

38. Adult Learners • There was a 20% increase in postsecondary education of working age populations between 1990 – 2007. • The number of adult learners is expected to increase 13% between 2010 – 2020.

39. Adult Learners • Looking for convenience and support during their college experience • Approximately 70% of adult learners are pursuing a college degree; approximately 30% of them are full time (Noel Levitz).

40. Non-traditional students have become the traditional student in postsecondary education

41. Student Needs • Online learning • Credit for prior learning • Digital text • 24/7 advising • Transfer pathways from certificate to baccalaureate • Move on when ready curriculum • Flexible financing options • High touch • Etc.

42. Success Framework for Closing the Gaps • Pre-College • Improve academic preparation for college • Encourage students to take a rigorous college preparatory high school curriculum. • Provide learning support to complete challenging coursework. • Provide greater access to rigorous to college preparatory courses with well prepared teachers. • Develop a strong college going culture in their high schools with adequate support from well-trained counselors and teachers.

43. Success Framework for Closing the Gaps • Pre-College • Improve college planning • Provide college planning programs beginning in middle schools. • Incorporate career education and college planning information in middle and high school curriculums. • Host college and career fairs in middle and high schools. • Host admission and financial information sessions for students and parents. • Provide resources on career, college and financial aid information. • Promote college planning websites and resources designed for students and parents. • Provide for opportunities for college tours and other college planning exercises.

44. Success Framework for Closing the Gaps • Pre-College • Improve financial planning information • Provide additional financial aid through increases in grant aid from institutional, state and federal sources by shifting aid away from merit aid at the institutional and state level. • Host workshops for students and their parents about the financial aid process and on filling out the FAFSA such as “College Goal Sunday”. • Provide greater assistance in covering unmet financial need such as through the use of expanded work study programs. • Provide greater assistance to independent students for child care and living expenses.

45. Success Framework for Closing the Gaps • Transitional Programming • Encourage enrollment in Dual Credit Programs. • Higher education and P-12 working together to provide transition courses to remediate students before college entrance • Provide early intervention through bridge programs. • Pre-enrollment orientation. • Provide early advising by college and university faculty and staff. • Create special mentoring programs for at risk populations. • Provide an academic plan that shows the pathway from high school to a two-year college and then to a four-year college or from high school to a four-year college.

46. Success Framework for Closing the Gaps • Freshmen Year • Provide both academic and social new student orientation programs. • Provide a parent orientation program. • Provide a freshmen seminar or first year transition course for credit. • Provide learning communities through residential programming or through common paired course enrollments. • Provide freshmen interest Groups. • Provide Service Learning opportunities. • Host a Student Government and Student Organization and Activities Fair. • Provide effective developmental education programming to address shortcomings in preparation.

47. Success Framework for Closing the Gaps • Advising Support • Provide intrusive academic advising program for freshmen and at risk students that promotes the development of academic goals and provides students with the tools and support to achieve those goal. • Provide assessments for academic course placement. • Provide an on campus advising center. • Provide an early warning alert program with counseling staff to work with students. • Provide student development and counseling centers for assistance with mental health and personal counseling. • Provide career counseling and development center. • Provide diagnostic assessments for motivation, values and vocational interests. • Help students to develop an academic plan for their major of the courses needed to graduate.

48. Success Framework for Closing the Gaps • Academic Supports • Provide resources such as the university catalog, schedule of classes and student handbook. • Learning communities. • Tutoring Programs • Supplemental instruction programs. • Writing Center Lab. • Mathematics Center Lab. • Reading Center Lab. • Organized study groups. • Require Library Orientation. • Offering additional opportunities for work-study to increase the amount of students spend on campus while meeting their financial needs.

49. Success Framework for Closing the Gaps • Social Supports • Residence Hall programming • Recreation and intramurals • Academic Clubs • Diversity Activities • Cultural Activities • Leadership Programs • Fraternities/Sororities • Mentoring Programs • Peer • Faculty • Staff • Alumni or Community Member

50. Success Framework for Closing the Gaps • Programs targeted for sub populations • Adult Students • Commuter Students • Women • Gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgendered students • Racial / ethnic minorities • Honor students • Athletes