170 likes | 341 Views
NPS/USGS Vegetation Mapping Program. BackgroundApproachProductsPresent statusAvailable data/Web site. What is it?. High priority requirement of the NPS I
E N D
1. National Park Service and USGS Biological Resources Division Vegetation Mapping Program More than just a map I am here to talk about the National Park Vegetation Mapping ProgramI am here to talk about the National Park Vegetation Mapping Program
2. NPS/USGS Vegetation Mapping Program Background
Approach
Products
Present status
Available data/Web site
3. What is it? High priority requirement of the NPS I&M Program
National (Service Wide) Program
Begins long term vegetation monitoring program
Has many short term immediate applications Why am I talking about a Park Service Program at a Forest Service Meeting?
Because of the items listed here. Like the Park Service, you have national responsibilities, you manage a wide range of ecosystems, you have specific management responsibilities that require information to implement. This is a program in its 5th year that has leasons that may be benefical to you. The lessons learned from this program could assist you in your vegetation classification and mapping efforts. I will come back to that later.
The Inventory Monitoring Program of the NPS is responsiblefor creating many base layers of information for parks including DOQQ’s, species lists, base cartographic data, and includes vegetation.
Short Term Applications
Resource Mangement - what is out there and what do we need to do with it to meet our goals?
Research - what bird species are associated with what vegetaion types?
- what is the distribution of a particular vegetation type across a Park?
Planning and Compliance - Are there invasive species, what do we need to do about them?
Interpretation - which is a big issue with the Park Service and may not be so important to you now, but
may become more important in the future.
Operations - How do we accomplish our management goals in specific vegetation types?Why am I talking about a Park Service Program at a Forest Service Meeting?
Because of the items listed here. Like the Park Service, you have national responsibilities, you manage a wide range of ecosystems, you have specific management responsibilities that require information to implement. This is a program in its 5th year that has leasons that may be benefical to you. The lessons learned from this program could assist you in your vegetation classification and mapping efforts. I will come back to that later.
The Inventory Monitoring Program of the NPS is responsiblefor creating many base layers of information for parks including DOQQ’s, species lists, base cartographic data, and includes vegetation.
Short Term Applications
Resource Mangement - what is out there and what do we need to do with it to meet our goals?
Research - what bird species are associated with what vegetaion types?
- what is the distribution of a particular vegetation type across a Park?
Planning and Compliance - Are there invasive species, what do we need to do about them?
Interpretation - which is a big issue with the Park Service and may not be so important to you now, but
may become more important in the future.
Operations - How do we accomplish our management goals in specific vegetation types?
4. NPS I&M Program Base cartographic
Soils
Geology
Vegetation
Bibliographies
Species lists
Air quality
Water quality
5. NPS National Program Differs from other NPS vegetation mapping projects
~270 park units (full park coverage)
4423 7.5 minute USGS quadrangles
National scope
Participation of multiple agencies
Consistency in detail and accuracy between parks
Produces digital products available on WWW
Coordination at multiple levels Large program which will eventually map all park units with a natural resource component
With multiple agency participation
The strength of the program is its standards, protocals and consistency.
Differs from other NPS vegetation mapping projects:
Number of park units to be mapped - 235, millions of acres
National scope
Results will be used at National, Regional and Local levels.
Participation of Multiple Agencies
Consistency in detail and accuracy between parks
Completeness (full park coverage)
GIS ready (digital products)
Coordination at multiple levelsLarge program which will eventually map all park units with a natural resource component
With multiple agency participation
The strength of the program is its standards, protocals and consistency.
Differs from other NPS vegetation mapping projects:
Number of park units to be mapped - 235, millions of acres
National scope
Results will be used at National, Regional and Local levels.
Participation of Multiple Agencies
Consistency in detail and accuracy between parks
Completeness (full park coverage)
GIS ready (digital products)
Coordination at multiple levels
6. Requirements Meet NPS overall management policies, standards and guidelines
Conform to Federal Geographic Data Committee standards
metadata, transfer, classification etc.
Has a nationally consistent, hierarchical, classification scheme
Meet National Map Accuracy Standards
Thematic accuracy >80% per class
Scale of 1:24,000
Minimum mapping unit of 0.5 hectare
The program has to meet Park Service requirements and
FGDC requirements
National Map Accuracy standards
Project specific requirements are:
80% accurate for each class
MMU of 0.5 ha
Meet NPS overall management policies, standards and guidelines
Conform to Federal Geographic Data Committee standards
Metadata, Transfer, Classification etc.
Uniformity in classification methodology
Meet National Map Accuracy Standards
Thematic Accuracy >80% per class
Minimum Mapping Unit of 0.5 hectareThe program has to meet Park Service requirements and
FGDC requirements
National Map Accuracy standards
Project specific requirements are:
80% accurate for each class
MMU of 0.5 ha
Meet NPS overall management policies, standards and guidelines
Conform to Federal Geographic Data Committee standards
Metadata, Transfer, Classification etc.
Uniformity in classification methodology
Meet National Map Accuracy Standards
Thematic Accuracy >80% per class
Minimum Mapping Unit of 0.5 hectare
7. Major steps for each Park Scoping meeting
Data review
Data acquisition
Field sampling
Classification characterization
Photo interpretation, mapping and automation
Accuracy assessment
Final product review
These are the basic steps that are required for each park unit
Data review - there are usually a lot of data avalaible for each unit, and it takes time and coordination to bring them together
The field sampling should ideally take place when the photo interpreters are doing their field work, so there can be coordination between what the ecologists classifiy and what the intepreters identify
The accuracy assessment should ideally be done when the mapping is complete so we can design a stratified random sample, but for efficiency’s sake, we often do accuracy assessment at the same time as the original field samplingThese are the basic steps that are required for each park unit
Data review - there are usually a lot of data avalaible for each unit, and it takes time and coordination to bring them together
The field sampling should ideally take place when the photo interpreters are doing their field work, so there can be coordination between what the ecologists classifiy and what the intepreters identify
The accuracy assessment should ideally be done when the mapping is complete so we can design a stratified random sample, but for efficiency’s sake, we often do accuracy assessment at the same time as the original field sampling
8. Products from the program Aerial photography (hardcopy, some new DOQQs)
Field data (hardcopy and database)
Classification report (description and key)
Photo interp report (description and key)
Accuracy report
Vegetation map data (digital coverage)
9. FGDC National Vegetation Classification System A. PHYSIOGNOMY
Division/Order - Tree dominant (dominant life form)
Class - Woodland (spacing & height of dominant form)
Subclass - Evergreen woodland (morphological & phenological similarity)
Group - Temperate evergreen needle-leaved (climate, latitude, growth form, leaf form)
Formation - Evergreen needle-leaved woodland with rounded crowns (mappable units)
B. FLORISTICS
Alliance (Cover Type) - Douglas Fir woodland (dominant species)
Association (Community) - Douglas Fir / Snowberry woodland (subdominant or associated species) The system is hierarchical which allows it to be used for many different levels of analysis and study - from National to regional to each Park to each site.
It is also standard - so we do not have to reinvent the wheel for each park, although a lot of development work has to be done for each park.The system is hierarchical which allows it to be used for many different levels of analysis and study - from National to regional to each Park to each site.
It is also standard - so we do not have to reinvent the wheel for each park, although a lot of development work has to be done for each park.
10. Mapping beyond the NVCS Species
Structure
Height classes
Layers (tree, shrub, herbaceous)
Density classes
Pattern
11. Present Status Approximately 79 projects in process
30 Parks started (1994-2000)
29 Park projects started in 2001
30 Parks completed
more completed soon
12. Status 2001
13. Present Status cont
14. Present Status cont
15. Relationship with FIREPRO Fire Fuels Mapping
Similar but not the same (ht to live crown, dead and down)
Fire Effects Monitoring
Similar but not the same (sampling techniques)
16. New Models Multiple park unit projects
Initiate and manage locally
“Regional/Network” field teams
Field based proposals
“New/other” technologies
17. More Information Visit the Veg Mapping Homepage
http://biology.usgs.gov/npsveg
18. Thanks
Mike Story
NPS I&M
(303)969-2746
mike_story@nps.gov