1 / 15

Chapter 23 Sections 3&4

Chapter 23 Sections 3&4. Kenly Defrant David MaRtinez 3 rd period. Section 3. How Can We Use Economic Tools to Deal with Environmental Problems?. Most Things Cost a Lot More Than You Thin.

flower
Download Presentation

Chapter 23 Sections 3&4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter 23Sections 3&4 Kenly Defrant David MaRtinez 3rd period

  2. Section 3 How Can We Use Economic Tools to Deal with Environmental Problems?

  3. Most Things Cost a Lot More Than You Thin Market price: does not include most of the external costs of harm to environment and human health associated with it. Such costs are called hidden costs The consumer does not pay for hidden costs Hidden costs can have short and long term harmful effects on people Neoclassical economists agree with not including hidden costs Environmental and Ecological economists believe they should be included

  4. Using Environmental Economic Indicators Can Help Reduce Our Environmental Impact Gross Domestic Product (GDP) provide a standardized and useful method for measuring and comparing the economic outputs of nations Environmental and Ecological economists want use of widespread indicators to help monitor environmental quality and human well-being

  5. We Can Include Harmful Environmental Costs in the Prices of Goods and Service Environmental and Ecological economists argue that an environmentally honest market system would include harmful environmental and health costs -this would reduce waste, pollution, and environmental degradation Reasons that Full Costing is not used: - producers would have to charge more - difficult to estimate harmful costs - consumers do not connect them to things they buy

  6. We Can Reward Environmentally Sustainable Businesses One way to encourage a shift to full-cost pricing it to phase out environmentally harmful subsidies and tax breaks -such subsidies the economic playing field and create economic incentives Japan, France, and Belgium have phased out all coal subsidies

  7. We Can Tax Pollution and Wastes instead of Wages and Profits Green taxes discourage pollution and resource waste which includes harmful costs Three requirements for successful implementation of green taxes: Must allow 10-20 years for companies to plan Income, payroll, or other taxes have to be reduced or replaced so that there is no increase in taxes The poor and middle class would need a safety net to reduce the regressive nature of any taxes on essentials such as food and fuel

  8. Environmental Laws and Regulations Can Discourage or Encourage Innovation Regulation is a form of government intervention in the marketplace that is widely used to help control or prevent pollution and reduce resource waste and environmental degradation - Involves enacting and enforcing laws that set pollution standards, regulate harmful activities, and protect certain irreplaceable resources

  9. We Can Reduce Pollution and Resource Waste by Selling Services instead of Things Service Flow Economy: instead of buying most goods outright customers could rent the services that such goods provide - manufacturers makes more money if its product uses the minimum amount of materials, lasts as long as possible, produces as little pollution as possible, and is easy to maintain, repair, reuse, or recycle.

  10. Section 4 How Can Reducing Poverty Help Us Deal with Environmental Problems?

  11. The Gap between the Rich and the Poor is Getting Wider Poverty (Inability To Meet Basic Economic Needs) Trickle-Down Effect (More Jobs/Revenue Providing Greater Tax Revenues) Flooding Up (Rich Take Most of the Money) Wealth Gap

  12. We Can Reduce Poverty • South Korea & Singapore reduced poverty in 2 decades by: • Education • Hard Work • Discipline • Attracted Investment Capital • China & India also on a Similar Path • Developed countries can help by: • Cancelling debt of the Poorest Nations (14 in Africa, 4 in Latin America)

  13. Case Study: Making Microloans to the Poor • 1983: Muhammad Yunus: • Grameen Village Bank in Bangladesh ($50-$500 to 6.6 Million) • Microloans Mostly to Women (Plant Crops, Buy Cows, or Start Business as Seamstresses, Weavers, Bookbinders, Vendors and Phone Service Providers) • “Solidarity” Groups (5 Members Total, if 1 Member missed a payment, other members make the payment)

  14. Case Study: Making Microloans to the Poor (Cont.) • 2006: Muhammad Yunus and his Grameen Bank Both Won the Nobel Peace Prize. • 2006: Citibank and TIAA-CREF each Committed $100 Million to Microloans.

  15. We Can Achieve the World’s Millennium Development Goals • 2000: Millennium Development Goals: • Sharply Reduce Hunger & Poverty • Improve Health Care • Empower Women • Moving Toward Environmental Stability by 2015 • Developed Counties: Spend 0.7% of National Budget Toward These Goals

More Related