1 / 3

Self-Determination Theory

Self-Determination Theory (SDT) has grown out of the research on motivation performed by Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci both of the University of Rochester (Ryan and Deci , 2000a). SDT establishes three internal needs that we seek to satisfy: competence, relatedness and autonomy.

flynn
Download Presentation

Self-Determination Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Self-Determination Theory (SDT) has grown out of the research on motivation performed by Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci both of the University of Rochester (Ryan and Deci, 2000a). • SDT establishes three internal needs that we seek to satisfy: competence, relatedness and autonomy. • SDT considers both internal and external motivation (Ryan and Deci, 2000). Self-Determination Theory

  2. We are intrinsically motivated to satisfy our needs of competence, relatedness and autonomy. • Extrinsic factors can have positive or negative effects on our intrinsic motivation based on the effect the extrinsic factors have on these needs (Deci, Koestner & Ryan, 2001). • Verbal rewards (“positive feedback”) can increase a student’s sense of competence • Tangible rewards such as grades or prizes can decrease a student’s sense of autonomy (control over their work) and have a negative impact on motivation. Extrinsic vs. Intrinsic Motivation in SDT

  3. Students wish to fulfill three primary needs. When instructional design leads to activities that fulfill these needs then learning can be more successful. • Competence • Students will be intrinsically motivated to perform if they feel they are competent and understand the material at hand. • This is best illustrated by the proper scaffolding of lessons so that students can master tasks and feel successful before moving on to more difficult work. (Dirksen, 2012) • Relatedness • Student engagement is enhanced when the instructional material covered has direct relevance to them (Deci, 2009) • Autonomy • Student success can be improved when activities allow students a sense of choice and control over the purpose and outcome of their education (Deci, 2009; Cavendish, 2013). SDT in Instructional Design

More Related