1 / 37

International engagement: m & e meeting

International engagement: m & e meeting. Monitoring & Evaluation: an introduction for practitioners. Liz Allen. monitoring & evaluation can play a vital role in the management & improvement of an activity, organisation or process. Source: Subsetum ; http://www.flickr.com/photos/subsetsum/.

forbes
Download Presentation

International engagement: m & e meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. International engagement: m & e meeting Monitoring & Evaluation: an introduction for practitioners Liz Allen

  2. monitoring & evaluation can play a vital role in the management & improvement of an activity, organisation or process Source: Subsetum; http://www.flickr.com/photos/subsetsum/

  3. Monitoring & evaluation: an introduction for practitioners my talk • Monitoring & evaluation: why do it? • Theory & practice • M & E: challenges • Keeping it real: practical & proportionality

  4. Monitoring & evaluation: rationale rationale my funder requires it … • accountability & validation • management of funding initiatives • strategy & planning • policy & advocacy • learning I want my programme to work well … I want to do more in the future … I want to tell people about what we do … & show the benefits … I want to find out what works …

  5. Theory

  6. M & E framework • Monitoring • Set up review • Process review • Formative review • Summative review Source: Subsetum; http://www.flickr.com/photos/subsetsum/

  7. M & E framework • Monitoring • Set up review • Process review • Formative review • Summative review • Inputs/activities • outputs • outcomes • … impact? • (longer term impact) Source: Subsetum; http://www.flickr.com/photos/subsetsum/

  8. M & E framework • Monitoring • Set up review • Process review • Formative review • Summative review Things to do & things to ‘measure/track’ • inputs/activities • outputs • outcomes • … impact? • (longer term impact) Source: Subsetum; http://www.flickr.com/photos/subsetsum/

  9. Theory & formal frameworks • Logical framework • Outcome mapping • Payback framework • Theories of change • Results-based management

  10. Monitoring & evaluation: rationale M & E in project cycle Learning & lessons for next time Project start ‘ M & E Framework’ design Taking stock OUTPUTS/OUTCOMES Set-up/process review INPUTS Monitoring & review points INPUTS & OUTPUTS

  11. Monitoring & evaluation: rationale Frameworks good for • keeping outcomes in mind • ‘forces’ definition of: • project objectives • indicators • appropriate data collection method & timings • organisation • simplification

  12. Monitoring & evaluation: rationale Frameworks less good • keeping outcomes in mind • ‘forces’ definition of: • project objectives • indicators • appropriate data collection method & timings • organisation • simplification • accommodating externalities & context • dealing with the unexpected • understanding process

  13. Practice doing m & e

  14. Monitoring & evaluation: doing m & e (my) basic principles • involvement of stakeholders • definition of objectives/outcomes & associated indicators & method • integrated into project plan from start • properly resourced • practical (usable) & proportionate

  15. Monitoring & evaluation: doing m & e (my) basic principles • involvement of stakeholders • definition of objectives/outcomes & associated indicators & method • integrated into project plan from start • properly resourced • practical (usable) & proportionate

  16. Introduction to LFA: defining indicators an indicator “quantitative or qualitative factor or variable that provides a simple and reliable means to measure achievement.” “ something that helps us to understand where we are, where we are going and how far we are from the goal ... They are bits of information that summarize the characteristics of systems or highlight what is happening in a system. “

  17. Introduction to LFA: defining indicators SMART & SPICED indicators SPICED Subjective Participatory Interpreted/communicable Cross-checked Empowering Diverse & disaggregated SMART Specific Measurable Achievable Relevant Timebound

  18. “Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted.”attributed to Albert Einsteintheoretical physicist, philosopher & author 1879-1955

  19. Quantitative • access & participation data (‘penetration’) • attendance & visitor data (‘reach’) • ‘audience’ characteristics (e.g. demographics) • consumer characteristics • scientific output assessment (e.g. publications) • ‘alt metrics’ • amount raised/ follow-on funding • structured opinion & feedback

  20. Qualitative • interviews • open questions (in questionnaire) • focus groups • ethnography • participatory research • observation • comment/bulletin boards • visitor books

  21. Monitoring & evaluation: an introduction for practitioners my talk • Monitoring & evaluation: rationale & overview • Theory & practice • M & E: challenges • Keeping it real: practical & proportionality

  22. the elusive ‘impact’ time frame involved serendipity attribution & contribution ‘ripple effects’ counter-factual value of ‘negative’ findings

  23. and closer to home … getting agreement on goals, objectives, indicators & method

  24. and resourcing m & e properly … adequately, systematically, proportionately…

  25. Monitoring & evaluation: an introduction for practitioners my talk • Monitoring & evaluation: rationale & overview • Theory & practice • M & E: challenges • Keeping it real: practical & proportionality

  26. Monitoring & evaluation: keeping it real Summary • Understand stakeholder & audience requirements • Be prospective: build m & e in from the start • Chooseright method & tailor • Resourcing: ensure access to key data & information & someone to manage this • Consider option for trends & benchmarks • Keep it real: be proportionate & practical – measures can evolve • Be flexible – learning is iterative & should be part of the process • Beware over-monitoring & evaluation!

  27. Wellcome Trust’s Indicators of Progress

  28. Wellcome Trust’s Indicators of Progress

  29. Wellcome Trust’s Indicators of Progress

  30. Questions l.allen@wellcome.ac.uk

  31. Suggested resources Ahmed, S. & Palermo, A-G (2010) Community Engagement in Research: Frameworks for Education and Peer Review. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 8: 1380-1387 Matthew, B. & Ross, L. (2010) Research Methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education Limited NORAD (2008) Results Management in Norwegian Development Cooperation: a practical guide.http://www.norad.no/en/tools-and-publications/publications/publication?key=109837 Stein, D. & Valters, C. (2012) Understanding ‘Theory of Change’ in international al development : a review of existing knowledge http://www2.lse.ac.uk/internationalDevelopment/research/JSRP/downloads/ToC_Lit_Review.pdf Vogel, I. (2012) Review of the use of ‘Theory of Change’ in international development. For DfID UK Web Center for Social Research methods http://socialresearchmethods.net

More Related