1 / 30

Non-intercepting Beam Size Monitor using Optical Diffraction Radiation

Non-intercepting Beam Size Monitor using Optical Diffraction Radiation. Tanaji Sen FNAL for A. Lumpkin, R. Moore, V. Scarpine, T. Sen, R. Thurman-Keup, M. Wendt US LARP Collaboration Meeting, April 24, 2008. Outline. Background on ODR Critical parameters Far-field spectrum

forest
Download Presentation

Non-intercepting Beam Size Monitor using Optical Diffraction Radiation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Non-intercepting Beam Size Monitor using Optical Diffraction Radiation Tanaji Sen FNAL for A. Lumpkin, R. Moore, V. Scarpine, T. Sen, R. Thurman-Keup, M. Wendt US LARP Collaboration Meeting, April 24, 2008

  2. Outline • Background on ODR • Critical parameters • Far-field spectrum • Near-field spectrum • ODR Monitor in the Tevatron • ODR in the LHC • Proposal ODR Monitor

  3. Progress since October 2007 • Detailed report on far-field ODR (LARP doc 711) • Near field spatial distribution (A. Lumpkin) • Synchrotron radiation background (R.Thurman-Keup) • Collaboration on ongoing experiments at JLAB, DESY (A. Lumpkin) • Mechanical design started • Space allocated in Tevatron • Decision on installation schedule (Spring 2009) ODR Monitor

  4. What is ODR? • Generated when a charged particle passes near a conducting surface. • Non-invasive technique to measure beam properties. • Can be generated in a straight section unlike synchrotron radiation. • Backward ODR is imaged at the same longitudinal location as the target • Can be observed in the far-field (Fraunhofer zone) • Can be observed in the near-field (Fresnel zone) • Potential applications to Leptons: ILC, XFEL, ERLs, Muon collider Protons: Tevatron, LHC ODR Monitor

  5. Brief History of ODR • Early theory developed in the late 1950s • Observation of coherent DR from electron bunch in 1995 • Observation of incoherent DR in the far-field from electron bunches in 2003 (KEK) • Beam size and position measurement in 2004 (KEK) • Interference between transition and diffraction radiation in 2005 (BNL) • Beam size and position measurement with the near field from electron bunches in 2007 (APS: Lumpkin) • Measurements at KEK, APS, BNL, DESY, CEBAF, … • 14 papers in Phys. Rev. Lett and PRSTAB since 1995, 6 in 2007-2008 ODR Monitor

  6. Diffraction Radiation - Layout Camera or PMT Filter Polarizer Far field imaging at KEK Phys. Rev Letters 90, 104801 (2003) 93, 244802 (2004) Near field image at APS PRSTAB:10,022802(2007) BDR 2Φ Target Proton beam Beam Effective source size at target = (γλ)/2π b Impact parameter Φ Target ODR Monitor

  7. ODR critical parameters • Impact parameter b • Wavelength λ • Energy γ • ODR intensity is significant when b ~ γ λ/(2π) • Intensity falls when b >> γ λ/(2π) • Beam divergence << 1/ γ in hadron beams Transverse fields from a particle Ex ~ (x / r┴) K1(2πr┴/γλ) -> (x/ r┴(3/2))exp[-2 π r┴/(γλ)] ODR Monitor

  8. Round hole: Far-field angular spectrum LARP doc 711 σ2 > σ1 • The angular spectrum peaks at ω= ωc • At fixed frequency, the ODR spectrum has peaks at θ ~1.6/γ • The minimum and maximum values and the locations of the extrema are sensitive to the beam size and beam position. • Ratio of minima to maxima can be used to determine beam size. σ1 Angle Angle Relative frequency ODR Monitor

  9. Round hole: far-field spectrum • Angular spectra (log scale) at 1 and 3 microns for Tevatron and LHC • At 3 microns, LHC spectrum is 4 orders of magnitude larger than in the Tevatron • The relative difference grows larger as the wavelength is decreased. ODR Monitor

  10. Rectangular slit: far-field spectrum • Angular spectra at 1 and 3 microns for Tevatron and LHC from a rectangular slit. • Similar features as with the round hole ODR Monitor

  11. Sensitivity to beam size LARP doc 711 P. Karataev et al PRL (2004) • Ratio of minimum to maximum increases quadratically with beam size • Sensitivity increases with frequency • Intensity changes at the few% level will detect beam size changes of fractions of σ Smaller relative beam size or larger separation b=8σ Measurement at KEK ODR Monitor

  12. Round hole: Photon yields LARP doc 711 • Tevatron: σ=0.4mm at C0 • 6σ clearance =>λc=14μm (u=1) • => λ = 2.8 μm (u=5) ------------------------------- • LHC: 18m from IP with β*=0.25m (after IR upgrade), σ=0.8mm • 7σ clearance =>λc=4.7μm (u=1) • => λ = 0.94μm (u=5) Nph ~ exp[-1.8ω/ωc] for ω > ωc Photon yield/bunch/turn in a 10% bandwidth Tevatron: Integrating over 36bunches and 1 second amplifies this by 1.7x106 ODR Monitor

  13. Tevatron: Beam size from near field Tevatron examples (γ=1044, λ=1.6 µm) for beam-size monitor Left: σx=400 µm and varyingd from 2-8 mm, Right: σx=400 µm ± 20%, σy=400 µm, d = 6 σy. Courtesy of C.-Y. Yao, ANL Perpendicular polarization ODR Monitor

  14. LHC: Beam size from near field LHC examples for beam-size monitor for σx=800 µm and varying d from 4.8-8 mm (L), and with σx=800 µm ± 20%, σy=800 µm, d = 6 σy, λ=1.0 µm, and γ=7500 (R). Perpendicular polarization Courtesy of C.-Y. Yao, ANL ODR Monitor

  15. Beam position from near-field OTR and ODR image centroid track BPM – see A. Lumpkin’s talk (CM10) ODR Monitor

  16. Place for ODR in the Tevatron Proposed C0 Section for Installation Courtesy: K. Duel • Space exists at C0 within a drift space for an ODR monitor • For protons, the nearest upstream dipoles are 11m away and they are weak • The synchrotron light monitor is close by and can be used for cross-calibration. ODR Monitor

  17. 3 600x10 24 3000 nm 3000 nm 24 3 400x10 22 500 20 20 300 400 18 Photons / s / 0.1%bw / mm 16 Photons / s / 0.1%bw / mm 300 16 200 14 200 mm 12 mm 100 2 12 2 100 10 0 8 0 8 6 4 4 2 0 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 mm -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 mm Synchrotron radiation background Vertical polarization with mask Vertical polarization (3 microns) Courtesy: R. Thurman-Keup ODR Monitor

  18. 24 1000 nm 1000 nm 24 3 22 40x10 3 40x10 20 20 30 18 30 16 Photons / s / 0.1%bw / mm Photons / s / 0.1%bw / mm 16 20 20 14 mm 12 mm 12 10 2 2 10 10 8 0 8 0 6 4 4 2 0 0 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 mm mm SR background at 1 micron Vertical polarization with mask Vertical polarization (1 micron) Courtesy: R. Thurman-Keup ODR Monitor

  19. ODR Schematic/ OTR monitor OTR monitor in the Tevatron at E0 ODR Monitor Courtesy: V. Scarpine

  20. Mechanical drawing of 10 way cross Courtesy: K. Duel ODR Monitor

  21. ODR Monitor in the LHC • ODR monitor would be stationed between the detector and 1st quadrupole – left and right side of IR • From β(-L), β(L) we can measure β*,α* • Not affected by errors elsewhere in the machine. • Non-invasive measurement of beam size and relative beam position during a store. • Regular arc dipoles are ~260m from IP ODR monitor ODR Monitor

  22. Pros/Cons of ODR in the LHC Pros. • Non-invasive measurement of the beam size at the IP • Measurement itself will not be influenced by optics errors • This can be used to diagnose gradient errors in the IR. • Relative beam position measurements can be compared against BPM measurements in the IR. • Bunch by bunch measurement may be possible Cons • Slower than synchrotron light monitor. Signal will have to be integrated over several turns. • Errors associated with the measurement are not well known. Measurements in the Tevatron will determine the limits of resolution. • The ODR monitor would be installed between the TAS and the 1st quad. Impact on the machine-detector interface needs to be better understood. ODR Monitor

  23. ODR Monitor proposal • Goal: To demonstrate the feasibility of ODR to measure beam size and position in a collider. • Steps (1) Design the ODR monitor for the Tevatron (2) Install monitor at C0 in Spring 2009 (next shutdown) (3) Set up monitor for proton beam measurements during shot set-up and beam studies (4) Proceed to use the monitor during luminosity stores (5) Design an ODR monitor for LHC parameters ODR Monitor

  24. Features of ODR Proposal • First test of ODR in a collider. The Tevatron offers a unique opportunity to further develop ODR – but the window is short. • Well defined start and end of task - Design and build now, install in Spring ‘09 - Ends with the Tevatron run in ‘10 • ODR/OTR experts involved Budget request • FY09: Labor: 1 FTE (to support 4-5 people), M&S: $50K • FY10: Request will depend on progress in FY09, will be mostly for labor. ODR Monitor

  25. People • A. Lumpkin, V. Scarpine, T. Sen, G. Tassotto, R. Thurman-Keup, M. Wendt • Tevatron dept. • Mechanical Engineering dept • Look forward to a collaboration with CERN • Experts from other US labs welcome ODR Monitor

  26. Summary • ODR has the potential to become a standard diagnostic tool • Proposed ODR monitor in the Tevatron will be the first test with a circulating beam. • LARP support is essential for test to proceed. • Success in the Tevatron will advance the state of the art. • ODR signals in the LHC will be orders of magnitude stronger than in the Tevatron at the same wavelength, or use lower wavelengths (~1/3rd) in the LHC • Imaging near the IP will provide an independent way to optimize luminosity ODR Monitor

  27. Backups ODR Monitor

  28. Measuring β*, α* • Beam size, hence β, is measured at +L, -L • α* = [β(-L) – β(+L)]/4L • β* = ( [< β>2 + 4(1+ α*2)L2]1/2 - < β>)/2) • < β> = [β(-L) + β(+L)]/2 • This measurement of β*, α* is independent of optics errors ODR Monitor

  29. Signal Intensity Levels Estimated Estimated signal has strong dependence on αb=2πb/γλ. FLASH, 0.8 µm LHC1, 1.6 µm LHC-2, 1.0 µm Log10α2K12 b values Tev-2,1.6 µm Tev-1,1.0 µm Units of 2πb/γλ Courtesy of Yao, Lumpkin ODR Monitor

  30. 25 6 12x10 3000 nm 20 10 15 8 25 3 500x10 10 3000 nm 6 20 5 400 4 15 Photons / s / 0.1%bw / mm mm 0 2 300 10 2 -5 -10 5 0 200 Photons / s / 0.1%bw / mm -15 mm 0 100 2 -20 -5 -25 0 -10 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 mm -15 -20 -25 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 mm SR background- wide views 3 microns Total Intensity Vertical polarization ODR Monitor

More Related